This problem is taken from Moldova National Mathematics Olympiad, 2013.
Let f : ( 0 , + ∞ ) → ( 0 , + ∞ ) be differentiable and let F be a primitive of f , such that 2 ( F ( x ) − f ( x ) ) = f 2 ( x ) , ∀ x ∈ ( 0 , + ∞ ) .
Find x → + ∞ lim x f ( x ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You cant say that a strictly increasing function's limit to infinity will always be inf. Take for example f(x)=(1+1/x)^x .Its limit to infinity is e=2.71.. besides that it is strictly increasing
Log in to reply
And indeed I never say that,
Here, check that the function is f : ( 0 , + ∞ ) → ( 0 , + ∞ ) .
Log in to reply
f:(0,+∞)→(0,+∞) This means that f can take every positive number and the output will be a positive number.That does not necessarily means that f takes every positive value(including +∞)
Doesn't f 2 ( x ) refer to f ( f ( x ) ) rather than ( f ( x ) ) 2 ? So shouldn't the derivative of f 2 ( x ) be f ′ ( f ( x ) ) f ′ ( x ) instead?
Log in to reply
I would say it means (f(x))^2.In Greece in high school we dont learn the difference and f^2(x) refers to (f(x))^2.
Log in to reply
That's interesting, but i feel it's supposed to be f ( f ( x ) ) .
See the following links:
here ,
a question that uses the idea of f 2 ( x ) as f ( f ( x ) ) ,
and a question using ( f ( x ) ) 2 to denote f ( x ) f ( x )
Log in to reply
@Jing Hao Pang – Here f 2 ( x ) = ( f ( x ) ) 2 . Otherwise I would specify what does the notation mean.
Log in to reply
@Nicolae Sapoval – Okay thank you for the clarification!
Actually, you are correct.
Exactly how I did it!
Exactly that is what i did
We differentiate the given equation implicitly: 2 ( f ( x ) − f ′ ( x ) ) f ( x ) − f ′ ( x ) f ( x ) f ′ ( x ) = 2 f ( x ) f ′ ( x ) = f ( x ) f ′ ( x ) = ( f ( x ) + 1 ) f ′ ( x ) = f ( x ) + 1 f ( x ) . Replacing f ′ ( x ) with d x d y and f ( x ) with y , this becomes the separable differential equation d x d y = y + 1 y . (1) We separate to get y y + 1 d y = d x , or ( 1 + y 1 ) d y = d x . Integrating both sides gives
y + ln y = x + c . (Since y > 0 , we can ignore the absolute value signs in ln ∣ y ∣ . ) Thus, we have x y + ln y = 1 + x c , so x → ∞ lim x y + ln y = x → ∞ lim ( 1 + x c ) = 1 . (2)
Now, we prove that x → ∞ lim y = ∞ , using equation (2) . Assume to the contrary that x → ∞ lim y is finite. (Remember that y is a function of x . ) Then, x → ∞ lim ln y is also finite, since ln y < y for all y . But then we get x → ∞ lim x y + ln y = 0 , contradicting equation (2) . (This is because the numerator approaches a finite number while the denominator approaches ∞ . ) Thus, by contradiction, lim x → ∞ y = ∞ .
This means that we can apply L'Hospital's Rule on the requested limit: L = x → ∞ lim x y = x → ∞ lim 1 d y / d x = x → ∞ lim d x d y . But from equation (1) , d x d y = y + 1 y . Since y approaches ∞ as x approaches ∞ , we conclude that L = x → ∞ lim d x d y = x → ∞ lim y + 1 y = y → ∞ lim y + 1 y = 1 .
This is the best solution because this is the only one that explains correctly as to why f ( x ) → ∞ as x → ∞
Log in to reply
Thanks! I too noticed that that was lacking from many of the other solutions. Glad mine was more correct :)
Perfect
we can see that : 2 F ( x ) = f 2 ( x ) + 2 f ( x ) > 0 . So we can write : f ( x ) = d x d F ( x ) = − 1 + 1 + 2 F ( x ) . By separation of variables : C + f ( x ) + lo g ( f ( x ) ) = ∫ − 1 + 1 + 2 F ( x ) d F = ∫ d x = x . ( 1 ) Now, it is obvious that f ( x ) → ∞ as x → ∞ . Therefore : x → ∞ lim f ( x ) lo g ( f ( x ) ) = 0 . Back to ( 1 ) : 1 = x → ∞ lim f ( x ) C + 1 + f ( x ) lo g ( f ( x ) ) = x → ∞ lim f ( x ) x . This means that : x → ∞ lim x f ( x ) = 1 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
First, i didn't know that primitive means anti-derivative, i had to google,
Clearly, F ′ ( x ) = f ( x ) .
Now, differentiate both sides of the given equation,
2 ( f ( x ) − f ′ ( x ) ) = 2 f ( x ) f ′ ( x ) ,
Rearranging the terms,
f ′ ( x ) = f ( x ) + 1 f ( x ) .
Note that f ′ ( x ) > 0 ∀ x ∈ R , hence the value + ∞ will be approached as x approaches + ∞ . Hence , we can apply L-hopital's rule on x → ∞ lim x f ( x ) .
∴ x → ∞ lim x f ( x ) = x → ∞ lim f ′ ( x ) = x → ∞ lim f ( x ) + 1 f ( x ) = x → 0 lim f ′ ( x ) f ′ ( x ) = 1