Find the largest positive integer a such that, for every positive integer n , a ∣ ∣ ∣ ( n 1 3 − n ) .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Your first "This tells us that", shouldn't it be p − 1 ∣ 1 2 ∏ p ∣ a ?
Log in to reply
No, no; you're right. I just messed it up in my brain. Now it's clear.
But a typo I think in the generalization; it must be a = ( p − 1 ) ∣ ( t − 1 ) ∏ p .
Log in to reply
Thanks. I believe I'm done fixing a bunch of stuff. Can you review it again?
Log in to reply
Now, all okay. Thank you!
In previous write-up, I liked the abstract element symbol 1 now replaced by d ; but now I see it was ambiguous with our number 1 . And 1 s ≡ 1 ⟹ s = p − 1 was wrong. It should have been s − 1 = p − 1 .
Log in to reply
@Muhammad Rasel Parvej – It's a cyclic group of order p − 1 , so there is an element of order p − 1 .
I've elaborated on why that means s ∣ 1 2 .
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – A helpful one for elementary readers!
Let's first see which prime p divide n 1 3 − n for every n . When for some n , p ∣ n , then obviously p divides n 1 3 − n . So, let's concentrate when p ∣ n 1 3 − n for every n with p ∣ n . That's where comes Fermat's Little Theorem .
But n 1 3 ≡ n ( m o d p ) for every n with p ∣ a WHEN 1 3 ≡ 1 ( m o d ( p − 1 ) ) ⟺ 1 2 ≡ 0 ( m o d ( p − 1 ) ) ⟺ ( p − 1 ) ∣ 1 2 . The set of possible values of ( p − 1 ) is { 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 1 2 } , yielding the set of all such p { 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , 1 3 } . Now we have, 2 × 3 × 5 × 7 × 1 3 = 2 7 3 0 . So, 2 7 3 0 ∣ n 1 3 − n for every n . So, is this the largest a ?
We see, ( p − 1 ) ∣ 1 2 is a sufficient condition for n 1 3 ≡ n ( m o d p ) for every n with p ∣ a . But is it also a necessary condition? Yes, it's also a necessary condition. I refer to Primitive Roots wiki here. For every prime p , there exists at least one number n whose multiplicative order (or equivalently speaking, minimum exponent e such that n e ≡ 1 ( m o d p ) ) modulo p is ϕ ( p ) = p − 1 . Thus, the condition p − 1 ∣ 1 2 is necessary such that n 1 3 ≡ n ( m o d p ) works for EVERY n with p ∣ a . Hence, { 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , 1 3 } is the complete set of such p .
Now we turn to numerical evidence. You can verify 2 7 3 0 2 1 3 − 2 = 3 and 2 7 3 0 3 1 3 − 3 = 5 8 4 . Since g c d ( 3 , 5 8 4 ) = 1 , we can deduce that 2 7 3 0 is the largest a . ■
Remark : If we did approach the problem with "Let's first see which prime power p e (with e ≥ 1 ) divide n 1 3 − n for every n " with the help of Euler's Theorem instead of "Let's first see which prime p divide n 1 3 − n for every n ", then we would not have to rely on Numerical Evidence.
Based on my interpretation of your current understanding, the following writeup would make much more sense.
This solution is incomplete.. Let me explain why.
The condition of p − 1 ∣ 1 2 is a sufficient condition. As you explained, if p − 1 ∣ 1 2 , then FLT gives us n 1 2 ≡ 1 ( m o d p ) .
However, is this condition necessary? Why can't there be another prime such that n 1 2 ≡ 1 ( m o d p ) for all coprime n but p − 1 ∣ 1 2 ?
Log in to reply
Thank you. I'm improving the solution.
Now I believe it's complete. Thanks to @Patrick Corn . And to you.
I don't think you necessarily need anything about primitive roots: once you've established that 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , 1 3 all work, so that their product 2 7 3 0 does, the "Numerical Evidence" is enough to show that 2 7 3 0 is the answer.
Log in to reply
I agree to "I don't think you necessarily need anything about primitive roots".
But I think the part of Primitive Roots minimize expectation form Numerical Evidence. Now we rely on Numerical Evidence only to see if the primes we already listed occurs in the answer with exponent more than 1 .
Before, we also have to rely for confirmation if no other prime, except those we listed already, occurs in the answer.
I think it's a positive achievement.
By Euler's theorem, we have that each of the primes 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 , 1 3 divides 1 2 so for each prime p stated before, we have n 1 3 − n ≡ 0 ( m o d p ) . Furthermore, if p is any prime, then p 2 does not divide p 1 3 − p in this case. Thus, the largest positive integer a which divides all n 1 3 − n or, the GCD of all elements of form n 1 3 − n is ( 2 ⋅ 3 ⋅ 5 ⋅ 7 ⋅ 1 3 ) = 2 7 3 0
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We use the following classification without proof:
Let p be any prime. Suppose that p k ∣ n ( n 1 2 − 1 ) for all n . Observe that for n = p , we have p k ∣ p ( p 1 2 − 1 ) and thus k ≤ 1 . Suppose that k = 1 , then applying the above classification, there exists a non-zero primitive element d such that the smallest solution to d s ≡ 1 ( m o d p ) is s = p − 1 . Since we have d 1 2 ≡ 1 ( m o d p ) , let 1 2 = s q + r with 0 ≤ r < s , then 1 ≡ d 1 2 ≡ d s q + r ≡ d r ( m o d p ) . Thus, r = 0 and so s ∣ 1 2 . This implies that a necessary condition for p k ∣ a is 1) k = 1 and 2) p − 1 ∣ 1 2 . Hence, a ∣ p − 1 ∣ 1 2 ∏ p .
Conversely, if p is any prime such that p − 1 ∣ 1 2 , then by Fermat's little theorem we know that n p ≡ n ( m o d p ) for all n . Hence, with ( p − 1 ) q = 1 2 , we get that n ( p − 1 ) q + 1 ≡ n ( m o d p ) for all n . Thus, a sufficient condition for p k ∣ a is 1) k = 1 and 2) p − 1 ∣ 1 2 . This tells us that p − 1 ∣ 1 2 ∏ p ∣ a .
Hence, we conclude that a = p − 1 ∣ 1 2 ∏ p .
The above proof generalizes to showing that the largest positive integer a such that for every positive integer n , a ∣ n t − n is given by a = p − 1 ∣ t − 1 ∏ p .