Find the number of positive integers x which satisfiy
⌊ 9 9 x ⌋ = ⌊ 1 0 1 x ⌋ .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You might want to mention that since we're considering positive integers x , we have m ≥ 0 and for m ≥ 0 , we have 9 9 m ≤ 1 0 1 m and 9 9 ( m + 1 ) < 1 0 1 ( m + 1 ) which is the reason for the intersection region being [ 1 0 1 m , 9 9 ( m + 1 ) ) (although this might be too trivial).
Nonetheless, nicely written solution. Same as what I did. +1 :)
Log in to reply
Isn't it highly overated ? see this
Log in to reply
There are many problems on quizzes that are overrated.
I used a simple logic as follows :
[ x / 9 9 ] = [ x / 1 0 1 ] = 0 only when x is 1,2,3,..,98 and simlarly it would work till 49. So now we can easily found the following sum :
98 + 97 + 95 + ... + 1 = 2499
"similarly it would work till 49"
And how exactly do you get the magic number 49 from? Just by looking at the equation? I don't see any explanation in your solution (you just wrote the solution set of x when the floored values are 0 and claim that this works till the 50th such solution set (when the floored values are 4 9 ). Justifying this claim is what's required in a solution.
See Arpon Paul's solution which explains how we get the bounds for k for the equation ⌊ x / 9 9 ⌋ = ⌊ x / 1 0 1 ⌋ = k ∈ Z 0 +
Same Method but maybe you could elaborate it a bit for others to understand.
Log in to reply
Which part do you think, need more elaboration?
Yes, you are rigth. I also used the same way that it is first 98(1-98) then an A.P. from 97 to 1(By calculating for first terms and then observation) but Dev what do you want to say by it work till 49? Please can you elaborate.
Log in to reply
It means it will work till 49 terms because the 49th term is 1 and we have to calculate till there.
You can generalize it for some contstants also.
No question that you got the right answer. But I'm not certain the way you wrote it up can be considered a complete solution.
Same intuitive, logical approach!
The sum of integers from 1 to 98 is not 2499, it is (n/2)*(98 + 1 ) =49 *99 = 4851, which is not the right answer. Ed Gray
Eh plus, how did u do it?
Decompose x in base 9 9 and 1 0 1 : \[\begin{align} \left.\begin{aligned} x&\overset{!}{=}99q_1+r_1\\ x&\overset{!}{=}101q_2+r_2 \end{aligned}\right\}&&
\Rightarrow&& q_1&=\left\lfloor\frac{x}{99}\right\rfloor=\left\lfloor\frac{x}{101}\right\rfloor=q_2,&&&r_1&\in\{0;\ldots;98\},&r_2&\in\{0;\ldots;100\} \end{align}\] The two decompositions of x have to be equal: 9 9 q 1 + r 1 = x = 1 0 1 q 2 + r 2 q 1 = q 2 = : q ⇒ r 1 = r 2 + 2 q , q ≥ 0
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
My approach was a bit mathematical rather than intuitive as Dev Sharma's.
Let, ⌊ 9 9 x ⌋ = ⌊ 1 0 1 x ⌋ = m
By defination,
m ≤ 9 9 x < m + 1 [ m is an integer]
⟹ 9 9 m ≤ x < 9 9 ( m + 1 ) ... ... ...(i)
Again,
m ≤ 1 0 1 x < m + 1
⟹ 1 0 1 m ≤ x < 1 0 1 ( m + 1 ) ... ... ...(ii)
Both (i) and (ii) inequalities are to be true, so 1 0 1 m ≤ x < 9 9 ( m + 1 ) Notice, if m > 4 9 , then 1 0 1 m > 9 9 ( m + 1 ) ;
So, for, m = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 , . . . 4 9 , the number of possible non-negative values for x is,
m = 0 ∑ 4 9 ( 9 9 m + 9 9 − 1 0 1 m ) = m = 0 ∑ 4 9 ( 9 9 − 2 m ) = 9 9 × 5 0 − 2 × 2 4 9 × 5 0 = 2 5 0 0
But 0 is not a positive integer.
So the answer is 2 5 0 0 − 1 = 2 4 9 9 .