Let a , b and c be positive real numbers such that
a 2 + a b + b 2 = 9 b 2 + b c + c 2 = 5 2 c 2 + c a + a 2 = 4 9 .
Find the value of a 2 4 9 b 2 − 3 3 b c + 9 c 2 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You are amazing! (I have a different solution. I should be done typing it by morning.)
Log in to reply
Now I know what Priyanshu Mishra meant by the title. So exciting! I may have never known about this geometric relationship to a triangle.
Log in to reply
The original HMMT started with the First Fermat point premise, and then did some geometrical trickery on some points of the triangle, obtaining an identity giving the answer 5 2 without determining a , b , c . It did contain an error, though. If you check out the reports, you can find a link to the HMMT near (if they haven't corrected it yet) solution.
Log in to reply
@Mark Hennings – I just looked at it. It hasn't been corrected as of yet. Thanks for pointing that out.
@Mark Hennings – This is the first time I've seen these techniques. I did a fair job just now to familiarize myself with the solution given in the HMMT document. I've heard the Fermat-Torricelli problem can be solved using tensor calculus. Perhaps I'll get to see that one day. By the way, I've heard of intentional errors being stuck into publications designed to spot plagiarism. So it makes me wonder if the author(s) made the error on purpose. (It says the problem was proposed by Alexander Katz.)
I just realized it's kinda similar to your second solution (but a little more complicated), but I'll post it anyway.
I thought I might share this with you because I was surprised by it. I originally tried to solve the problem using a different method, but it didn't work. I reduced all three equations to be in just the variables a and b , and the result resembled a linear system, but with a 2 , a b , b 2 instead of x , y , z . So, naturally, I stuck the coefficients into Matlab as a matrix, and tried to take the inverse to solve the system. To my surprise, the condition number of the matrix was around 1 0 − 1 8 . I verified by hand that the matrix was indeed singular. However, I have no explanation as to why that happened. My belief is that this shouldn't happen in every case.
Here was my solution. b 2 + b c + c 2 − a 2 − a b − b 2 = 5 2 − 9 ⇒ b c − a b + c 2 − a 2 = 4 3 ⇒ ( c − a ) ( a + b + c ) = 4 3 b 2 + b c + c 2 − c 2 − c a − a 2 = 5 2 − 4 9 ⇒ b c − c a + b 2 − a 2 = 3 ⇒ ( b − a ) ( a + b + c ) = 3 ⇒ 4 3 ( b − a ) ( a + b + c ) = 3 ( c − a ) ( a + b + c ) ⇒ 4 3 b − 4 3 a = 3 c − 3 a ⇒ c = 3 4 3 b − 4 0 a ⇒ c 2 + a c + a 2 = ( 3 4 3 b − 4 0 a ) 2 + a ( 3 4 3 b − 4 0 a ) + a 2 = 4 9 ⇒ ( 3 4 3 ) 2 b 2 + ( 3 4 3 − 9 8 0 ⋅ 4 3 ) a b + ( ( 3 4 0 ) 2 − 3 4 0 + 1 ) = 4 9 ( 3 4 3 ) 2 b 2 + ( 3 4 3 − 9 8 0 ⋅ 4 3 ) a b + ( ( 3 4 0 ) 2 − 3 4 0 + 1 ) − ( 3 4 3 ) 2 ( a 2 + a b + b 2 ) = 4 9 − 9 ( 3 4 3 ) 2 ⇒ 3 1 7 2 0 a b + 4 0 a 2 = 1 8 0 0 ⇒ b = 4 3 1 ( a 1 3 5 − 3 a ) ⇒ a 2 + a b + b 2 = a 2 + a [ 4 3 1 ( a 1 3 5 − 3 a ) ] + [ 4 3 1 ( a 1 3 5 − 3 a ) ] 2 = 9 ⇒ 1 7 2 9 a 4 − 1 1 6 4 6 a 2 + 1 3 5 2 = 0 ⇒ a 2 = 9 1 2 2 5 , 1 9 8 1 Recall the problem asks for positive values of a , b , c . There is only one positive value of a that produces positive values for both b and c . Whence, the sought solution is a = 9 1 1 5 , b = 9 1 1 8 , c = 9 1 5 8 . I'll leave it for the reader to verify that this leads to the answer, 52.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The lengths a , b , c are the distances P X , P Y , P Z from a point P to the vertices of a triangle X Y Z which has sides x = 2 1 3 , y = 7 and z = 3 , where angles ∠ X P Y , ∠ Y P Z , ∠ Z P X are all 1 2 0 ∘ , and hence P is the first Fermat point of the triangle X Y Z . The Cosine Rule tells us that cos X = 7 1 cos Y = 1 3 1 cos Z = 7 1 3 2 3 so the triangle X Y Z is acute-angled.
We have (relative) trilinear coordinates X : Z : 1 : 0 : 0 0 : 0 : 1 Y : P : 0 : 1 : 0 c o s e c ( X + 2 1 π ) : c o s e c ( Y + 3 1 π ) : c o s e c ( Z + 3 1 π ) = 5 3 1 4 : 3 3 2 1 3 : 2 3 3 1 4 1 3 Doing the standard calculations, the exact trilinear coordinates of these four points are (note that the area of the triangle is Δ = 2 1 y z sin X = 6 3 ): X : Z : 1 3 6 3 : 0 : 0 0 : 0 : 4 3 Y : P : 0 : 7 1 2 3 : 0 9 1 1 3 2 6 1 3 : 6 3 7 4 3 5 3 : 9 1 4 5 3 Since the distance between two points with (exact) trilinear coordinates a 1 : b 1 : c 1 and a 2 : b 2 : c 2 is given by the (amongst many others) the formula sin Z ( a 1 − a 2 ) 2 + ( b 1 − b 2 ) 2 + 2 ( a 1 − a 2 ) ( b 1 − b 2 ) cos Z we deduce the distances a = P X = 9 1 1 5 b = P Y = 9 1 1 8 c = P Z = 9 1 5 8 and these values can be readily checked as satisfying the original conditions.
Note that 4 9 × 1 8 2 − 3 3 × 1 8 × 5 8 + 9 × 5 8 2 = 5 2 × 1 5 2 and hence a 2 4 9 b 2 − 3 3 b c + 9 c 2 = 5 2 It is worth noting that 2 5 b c = 1 1 6 a 2 , and hence that a 2 4 9 b 2 + ( 2 5 n − 3 3 ) b c + 9 c 2 = 5 2 + 1 1 6 n for any integer n . In particular, when n = 3 , a 2 4 9 b 2 + 4 2 b c + 9 c 2 = 4 0 0 Since it is also true that 7 × 1 8 + 3 × 5 8 = 2 0 × 1 5 we have 7 b + 3 c = 2 0 a , and hence many other identities are possible.
Here is another approach.
If we start with the equations a 2 + a b + b 2 b 2 + b c + c 2 a 2 + a c + c 2 = = = 9 5 2 4 9 ( 1 ) ( 2 ) ( 3 ) then subtracting these equations in pairs, we obtain ( c − b ) ( a + b + c ) = 4 0 ( b − a ) ( a + b + c ) = 3 and hence 3 ( c − b ) = 4 0 ( b − a ) , so that 4 0 a + 3 c = 4 3 b Thus we can substitute for b in equation ( 1 ) , obtaining a 2 + a ( 4 3 4 0 a + 3 c ) + ( 4 3 4 0 a + 3 c ) 2 = 9 which simplifies to 5 1 6 9 a 2 + 3 6 9 a c + 9 c 2 = 1 6 6 4 1 ( 4 ) Thus 4 9 ( 4 ) − 1 6 6 4 1 ( 3 ) gives 1 2 0 ( 1 9 7 2 a 2 + 1 2 a c − 1 3 5 c 2 ) 1 2 0 ( 3 4 a + 9 c ) ( 5 8 a − 1 5 c ) = 0 = 0 If c = 1 5 5 8 a then equation ( 3 ) tells us that a = ± 9 1 1 5 , and hence we obtain the solutions a = ± 9 1 1 5 b = ± 9 1 1 8 c = ± 9 1 5 8 If, on the other hand, c = − 9 3 4 a , then equation ( 3 ) tells us that a = ± 1 9 9 , and hence we obtain the solutions a = ± 1 9 9 b = ± 1 9 6 c = ∓ 1 9 3 4 Thus there is only one solution where a , b , c are all positive (and one where all three values are negative), but there is another pair of solutions where both positive and negative values occur.
Indeed, this second class of solutions has a geometrical interpretation as well. We have a = ± Q X b = ± Q Y c = ∓ Q Z where Q is the Second Fermat point of the triangle (note that ∠ X Q Z = ∠ Y Q Z = 6 0 ∘ as well as ∠ X Q Y = 1 2 0 ∘ , which accounts for the sign changes).