The function f ( x ) = x 3 − 1 1 x 2 + 1 9 x + 1 3 has zeros a 1 , a 2 , a 3 . Then what is the value of [ a 1 ] + [ a 2 ] + [ a 3 ] ?
Note: [ m ] Represents the greatest integer less than or equal to m .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I think once you draw the graph the question is so very easy :D.
@shubhendra singh wow i am so clumsy, i added wrong on my third try and got 10
Log in to reply
@Mardokay Mosazghi hard luck :( ........ and great you seem to have a good amount of followers.
Let's use Cardano's method:
Make the substitution x = 3 y + 1 1 to delete the quadratic term, and multiply by 2 7 :
( 3 y + 1 1 ) 3 − 1 1 ( 3 y + 1 1 ) 2 + 1 9 ( 3 y + 1 1 ) + 1 3 = 0 y 3 − 1 9 2 y − 4 3 0 = 0
Now, compare that equation with the identity ( u + v ) 3 − 3 u v ( u + v ) − ( u 3 + v 3 ) = 0 . An equation system will be formed:
y = u + v 3 u v = 1 9 2 ⟹ u 3 v 3 = 2 6 2 1 4 4 u 3 + v 3 = 4 3 0
Make an equation in z with roots u 3 and v 3 :
( z − u 3 ) ( z − v 3 ) = z 2 − ( u 3 + v 3 ) z + u 3 v 3 = 0 z 2 − 4 3 0 z + 2 6 2 1 4 4 = 0
Using the quadratic formula we get:
z = 2 1 5 ± 3 2 3 9 9 1 i
Now, let's find the absolute value and the argument of z :
∣ z ∣ = 2 1 5 2 + ( 3 2 3 9 9 1 ) 2 ∣ z ∣ = 5 1 2
ar g ( z ) = s g n ( I m ( z ) ) arccos ( ∣ z ∣ R e ( z ) ) ar g ( z ) = ± arccos ( 5 1 2 2 1 5 )
So,
u = 3 ∣ z ∣ c i s ( 3 ar g ( z ) ) , v = 3 ∣ z ∣ c i s ( − 3 ar g ( z ) )
y = u + v = 2 3 ∣ z ∣ cos ( 3 ar g ( z ) )
The imaginary parts are cancelled because u and v are complex conjugates.
y = 1 6 cos ( 3 1 arccos ( 5 1 2 2 1 5 ) + 3 2 π k ) for k = 0 , 1 , 2 .
Finally,
x 1 = 3 1 6 cos ( 3 1 arccos ( 5 1 2 2 1 5 ) ) + 1 1 ≈ 8 . 6 2 1 2
x 2 = 3 1 6 cos ( 3 1 arccos ( 5 1 2 2 1 5 ) + 3 2 π ) + 1 1 ≈ − 0 . 5 2 0 1
x 3 = 3 1 6 cos ( 3 1 arccos ( 5 1 2 2 1 5 ) + 3 4 π ) + 1 1 ≈ 2 . 8 9 8 9
⌊ x 1 ⌋ + ⌊ x 2 ⌋ + ⌊ x 3 ⌋ = 8 − 1 + 2 = 9
Man salute! using bulldozer to dig an inch hole
Try looking for the values of f(x) for a few integers.
For negative integers, the polynomial tends to become 'more' negative as we can easily see. Hence, there would be no negative root. But, f(0) is positive while f(-1) is negative, as a result there has to be a root in between x = 0 and x = -1.
Now, we can look that
f ( 1 ) = 2 2 , f ( 2 ) = 1 5 , f ( 3 ) = − 2
Hence, there has to be a root between x = 2 and x = 3
Now, for getting the next root, use Vieta,
a 1 + a 2 + a 3 = 1 1
a 1 would be 2. x (2. x means 2 and '.' means decimal point and x is some number after decimal point)
Similarly, a 2 would be -0. y
Therefore, 2 . x − 0 . y + a 3 = 1 1
Now, as f(3) = -2 and f(2) = 15. it is almost certain that a 1 > 2 . 5 .
As a result, 2 . x − 0 . y ≈ 2 . z
a 3 = 1 1 − 2 . z
As a result a 3 will be 8 . w
Therefore, [ a 1 ] + [ a 2 ] + [ a 3 ] = [ 2 . x ] + [ − 0 . y ] + [ 8 . w ] = 2 − 1 + 8 = 9
I hope this is the desired approach.
Log in to reply
Actually f(2)=-5 if am right.. so another root lies between 1 and 2
Also the last root lies between 9 and 10 and the other between 0 and -1
adding we get 1-1+9 = 9
we can use newtens method to approximate the root using calculator
On taking out the roots of the equation we get three roots
-0.5
2.8
8.6
GIF of -0.5=-1
Of 2.8 =2
Of 8.6=8
Thus we get sum as 8+2+(-1)=9
@Parth Lohomi How did you manage to find out the roots ????
Log in to reply
plotted a graph and looked for nearest value (digits after 1 decimal place are imaginary)
Log in to reply
That's nothing different from my solution. I think you should have mentioned the use of graph in your solution
Log in to reply
@Shubhendra Singh – Okay I agree thats like your solution but i have given approximate values too but still i am upvoting your solution
Log in to reply
@Parth Lohomi – Thanks for that . I just wanted to make your solution much better rather than criticizing it :D
Log in to reply
@Shubhendra Singh – No problem @shubhendra singh .My pleasure
Log in to reply
@Parth Lohomi – Hey YOU used WOLFRAM ALPHA
Log in to reply
@Mehul Chaturvedi – No man I do questions by my own you can not say anything to anyone
Graphing is CHEATING!!!
I used the Newton Raphson algorithm with an initial value of 2 and obtained 2.898927 as one of the roots. Then we use the sum and product of the roots to locate the other 2 roots using the quadratic formula. The roots being 0.650, 2.899 & 7.451 giving values of 0, 2 and 7 and hence 9 as the required answer
a 1 − 1 < [ a 1 ] ≤ a 1 ...(1)
a 2 − 1 < [ a 2 ] ≤ a 2 ...(2)
a 3 − 1 < [ a 3 ] ≤ a 3 ...(3)
Also a 1 + a 2 + a 3 = 1 1
adding (1),(2) and (3), we get
8 < S u m ≤ 1 1
So answer is 9 , 10 or 11.
u can do this without graphs by mere guessing values and when a sign change occurs between n and n+1 , [root]=n .Then just add up
Well i do not know if there is an algebraic method, i used graph.
we can differentiate the function and check that it has a maxima sligtly to the right of 0 and minima slightly to the leftof 7
Also at x=1 y is positive. And at x=2 negative . so one of the roots GIF is 1
next on putting x=-1 we get negative value
so another roots GIF is -1
now i know that minima lies at very close to 7. it is likely that roots lie at (8,9) or (9,10)
we can check again by sign method that it lies between (9,10) So third GIF is 9.
adding we get 9
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
On drawing the graph of the polynomial it will intersect x axis 3 times. Between -1 and 0 , b/w 2 and 3 and b/w 8 and 9 so simply by the answer would become -1 +2+8 =9.