S = i = 1 ∑ ∞ j = 1 ∑ ∞ k = 1 ∑ ∞ i j k ( i + j + k ) 1
If S can be expressed as B A π C for positive integers A , B , C with g cd ( A , B ) = 1 , submit the value of A + B + C as your answer.
Bonus: Generalize the expression below in terms of n :
P ( n ) = i 1 = 1 ∑ ∞ i 2 = 1 ∑ ∞ ⋯ i n = 1 ∑ ∞ i 1 i 2 ⋯ i n ( i 1 + i 2 + … + i n ) 1 = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Did the exact same! Nice easy problem!
Log in to reply
Except I did it without IBP. I did it using Feynman's Method.
∫ 0 1 1 − x x n d x will be our "base" integral.
∫ 0 1 x n k = 0 ∑ n x k d x
k = 0 ∑ n ∫ 0 1 x n + k d x
k = 0 ∑ n n + k + 1 1 [I would have directly used Harmonic or digamma but just to show, I have used this long method]
I ( n ) = k = 0 ∑ n n + k + 1 1
I guess it's very easy to guess what's I ( m ) ( 0 ) ? Right?
I ( m ) ( 0 ) = ( − 1 ) m Γ ( m + 1 ) ζ ( m + 1 )
Log in to reply
Wait. How is Digamma applied here? I don't see any possible instance of using it here.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Through this definition of digamma -
ψ ( n + 1 ) + γ = ∫ 0 1 1 − x 1 − x n d x or what you call a harmonic number.
These kinds of problems are obviously easy for you. I always refrain from using higher topics of calculus like Digamma and all as I myself know nothing about them. By the way, I'm designing a set of correlated problems on Calculus for my 400 followers celebration.. hope you'll like them :D
Log in to reply
Could you tell me what is the answer for n = 2 with (2.40411380630063+) related to π ? Probably no similar relation.
Log in to reply
@Lu Chee Ket – When n = 2 , we arrive at 2 ζ ( 3 ) but since we don't know the exact values of ζ ( odd numbers ) in form of π , e , etc., thus we can only show the answer in form of ζ function or approximated decimals.
Log in to reply
@Satyajit Mohanty – Thanks very much! I am trying to find if ∑ i = 1 ∞ i 6 1 is related to π 6 . Seem only up to π 4 .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particular values of Riemann zeta function#Even positive_integers
Log in to reply
@Lu Chee Ket – As of now, mathematicians are only able to find the exact form of ζ ( n ) where n is a positive even number.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – n ! ∑ r = 0 ∞ ( r + 1 ) n + 1 1 is the exact sum for all but no simple expression generally; I read a writing and find that only 6 π 2 and 9 0 π 4 are available. For odd n = 3, people just evaluate it up to many significant figures.
Log in to reply
@Lu Chee Ket – That's what I said. As of now, there's no exact form for ζ ( 3 ) . Please familiarize yourself with Riemann zeta function .
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – I have already read the website you introduced when I discussed with Satyajit Mohanty. The question is I don't find exact form for n = 6, 8 and 10 neither.
Log in to reply
@Lu Chee Ket – Here .
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Thanks a lot! He didn't tell me these as I only told him that I am searching for these.
The problem is set as B A π C to satisfy Brilliant's methods of answering. In General, such problems would come directly. Your method is not accurate. It's just a guess which fortunately worked well with this problem.
Log in to reply
You may appreciate how a correct guess can be arrived with plenty of of observations from sufficient extends. 6.49351257882126152+ with extreme 1,133,000 is continuing in my evaluation. Yet, I also described as followed.
Log in to reply
Still, this is a wrong method. Like most (or all?) of your other solutions, you have arrived at the right answer using the wrong method. The question is not phrased like "This summation appears to be approximately equal to B A π C for integers A , B , C . What is the most likely reasonable values of A , B , C ? Submit your answer as A + B + C ."
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Brilliant means having ways particularly alternatives even when we are in a situation of helpless resources. Not because of knowledge but the Tao that makes these sensible. The evidence is almost all correct for guesses attempted. If not once then only because of laziness.
i = 1 ∑ ∞ i ( i ) 1 = 6 π 2 , f o r n = 1
i = 1 ∑ ∞ i 2 + 2 1 = 9 0 π 4 , f o r n = 3
i = 1 ∑ ∞ j = 1 ∑ ∞ k = 1 ∑ ∞ i j k ( i + j + k ) 1 = 6 . 4 9 3 + , f o r n = 3
Having found that ( 6 . 4 9 3 + ) / 9 0 π 4 → 6 , I guess exact relation is determined.
Whether we believe a relation of ( π 2 ) 2 of π 4 is crucial. Once we believe in this way, I think an exact relation of 6 times to very good approximation to 6.493+ can help to determine an exact answer without knowing the mathematics concerned! So far, 6.49347873699081405+ for extreme of 1,038,000 has been obtained from real evaluation. 6 × 9 0 π 4 = 1 5 π 4 is therefore possible to be determined once we believe we can with fortunate trials!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We'll start generalizing our Bonus Problem to calculate S by substituting n = 3 .
We first notice that:
P ( n ) = i 1 = 1 ∑ ∞ ⋯ i n = 1 ∑ ∞ i 1 i 2 ⋯ i n 1 ∫ 0 1 x i 1 + i 2 + … + i n − 1 d x = ∫ 0 1 x 1 ( i 1 = 1 ∑ ∞ i 1 x i 1 ) ⋯ ( i n = 1 ∑ ∞ i n x i n ) d x = ∫ 0 1 ( − 1 ) n x ( ln ( 1 − x ) ) n d x
We now use the substitution t = 1 − x in the above integral to get:
P ( n ) = ( − 1 ) n ∫ 0 1 1 − t ( ln ( t ) ) n d t = ( − 1 ) n ∫ 0 1 ( ln ( t ) ) n ( r = 0 ∑ ∞ t r ) d t = ( − 1 ) n r = 0 ∑ ∞ ∫ 0 1 t r ( ln ( t ) ) n d t
In view of the integration by parts formulaes, we see that:
∫ 0 1 t r ( ln ( t ) ) n d t = ( − 1 ) n ( r + 1 ) n + 1 n !
Therefore:
P ( n ) = ( − 1 ) n r = 0 ∑ ∞ ( − 1 ) n ( r + 1 ) n + 1 n ! = n ! r = 0 ∑ ∞ ( r + 1 ) n + 1 1
⟹ P ( n ) = n ! ⋅ ζ ( n + 1 )
where ζ ( s ) denotes the Riemann-Zeta Function. To calculate the value of S , substitute n = 3 to obtain:
S = 3 ! ⋅ ζ ( 4 ) = 6 ⋅ 9 0 π 4 = 1 5 π 4
So A = 1 , B = 1 5 , C = 4 , A + B + C = 2 0