Hole in a bucket

Water flows out of the hole on the side of a bucket and follows a parabolic path. If the bucket falls freely under gravity, ignoring air resistance, the water flow...

stops decreases but continues to flow follows a straight line path relative the falling bucket follows a parabolic path relative the falling bucket

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

When the bucket is stationary, the pressure from the water above the hole, due to its weight, pushes the water next to the hole outward from the bucket. But when the bucket is falling, all the water in the bucket is in essence weightless, and hence there is no longer any relative pressure on the water next to the hole. Without any pressure, there is no impetus for the water to exit the bucket, i.e., the water flow would stop.

If there were air resistance to consider, then things get more interesting. Gravity would act on both the bucket and water, but air resistance would act solely on the bucket. This would mean that the water would no longer be weightless, as the bucket would essentially be "pushing up" on the water inside, creating pressure. This pressure would then provide impetus for the water next to the hole to exit, albeit at a lesser rate than when the bucket is stationary.

What will happen if the holes were at the bottom instead . Will it still do the same thing

Syed Baqir - 5 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

If we ignore air resistance then the result would be the same as with the hole on the side, as there would be no pressure to push the water through the hole.

If we did include the effect of air resistance, then with the hole on the bottom the air would be pushing up on the water near the hole as well as on the bucket. This upward force from the air on the water near the hole would counter the pressure from the surrounding water, but I'm not sure if these forces would cancel each other out. I suspect that the size of the hole would be a variable we would need to consider. I might have to do an experiment. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 5 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Great Sir If the holes were at the bottom then air resistance would push the water upward but the bucket with water will continue to increase the speed . The only downward force will be only due to gravity therefore

Resultant Force = mass*G - X

X = Variable Air Resistance (force) G = gravity

Depending on Air Resistance water will behave

Positive answer will mean downward and vice versa

Syed Baqir - 5 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Syed Baqir Let say the bucket is at a terminal speed in the air. Resultant acceleration stopped and hence full reaction from bottom of the bucket to weight of water shall take place. Due to the fact of pressure resumed to water in the bucket, water should flow out despite similar air resistance acts onto outlet of water. Typical size would best be a base ball's size. However, I think even a small hole shall have water to exit.

Lu Chee Ket - 5 years, 6 months ago

isn't the question unclear about its given factors and the location of the hole?

Kim Ian Macay - 5 years, 6 months ago
William Clukey
Dec 3, 2015

In all actually, the question is flawed, yet oddly enough, still correct. If there is no air resistance, then this is being performed in a vacuum. The water would turn into steam; therefore the answer of water flow stopping is still correct,but there would be steam shooting out.

Mohaiminul Adil
Nov 19, 2015

This is a condition of weightlessness.....

is that so?

Kim Ian Macay - 5 years, 6 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...