Hourglass on a balance

The weight of this hourglass is monitored constantly.

The last grain of sand falls from the top of the hourglass at t 1 t_1 , and hits the bottom at t 2 t_2 .

Which line best represents the readout of the weight on the scale?

  1. Blue
  1. Black
  1. Green
  1. Red

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Laszlo Mihaly
May 1, 2018

As long as the sand is running there will be a column of sand in the free falling state. The sand in this column does not contribute to the weight of the hourglass (the "missing weight"). However, there would be an extra downward force created by the impact of the sand particles as they come to stop (the "excess weight"). A simple calculation shows that these two factors approximately cancel each other. A more accurate calculation, that takes into account that the length of the free falling sand column decreases gradually, yields a slightly increased weight as long as the sand is running.

From the moment the last grain of sand starts falling the "missing weight" starts dropping, as there will be fewer and fewer sand grains in the free falling state. The "excess weight" remains unchanged. Therefore we will see a gradual increase of the readout of the balance. At the moment the last grain of sand lands, the "excess weight" suddenly drops to zero.

This process is best illustrated by the green curve.

For a very detailed analysis and experimental evidence, see https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1119/1.4973527 , discovered by Blake Farrow after I posted the problem.

(My original problem has been slightly edited by Brilliant Staff. This solution has been also edited to reflect change.)

Moderator note:

Note this problem essentially is 1 out of a series of 3, spanning through all the levels:

Science problem from Basic

Science problem from Intermediate

Science problem from Advanced

Greetings. I thought that since the center of mass is moving downwards, the normal force must be less than the total weight during the initial period. Is it the case then that the center of mass is moving downward with constant velocity?

Steven Chase - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

You are right. Perhaps my wording is not clear, but I did not intend to ask the question about the initial period, when the sand starts to flow. Once the flow is established fully, the weight will be approximately the same as the "static" weight, since the total momentum of the system is nearly steady, as long as we neglect the gradual shortening of the length of the free falling sand column.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

I was inspired to write this problem after reading two of yours this week, Laszlo. I think it addresses Steven's comment here. https://brilliant.org/problems/hourglass-redux/

Blake Farrow Staff - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

@Blake Farrow I've been thinking that I would just derive a formula for the variation of the COM position over time, and then derive the force from that.

Steven Chase - 3 years ago

@Blake Farrow I looked at the problem, great work. Especially interesting that you found the experimental evidence. Indeed, the statement in my solution that "simple calculation shows that these two factors cancel each other" is true only as long as we neglect the fact that the sand level in the lower container is slowly increasing. This will cause a gradual shortening of the free - falling sand column, and that, in turn will, make the weight appear slightly more than the original weight. This effect is much smaller than the effect I was discussing in the current problem, and I believe that the green graph is still a good representation of the story.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

The center of mass does not move downward with constant velocity before t 1 t_1 .

If μ \mu is the mass flow rate of the sand (in gram per meter, e.g.), y 1 y_1 the position of the top of the sand in the top container and y 2 y_2 the height of the top of the sand in the bottom container, then the velocity of the center of mass is v C M = μ ( y 2 y 1 ) v_{CM} = \mu(y_2 - y_1) . This would be constant if the difference y 2 y 1 y_2 - y_1 were constant; however, this is not the case because the cross sections of top and bottom are not equal, and even vary in different ways.

Because of that, you would expect the graph left of t 1 t_1 to show some curvature.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

The effect you describe yields an increased weight while the sand is falling. The green graph represents that, but it is focused on the narrow time range during which the sand flow stops. Therefore any curvature is invisible. See Blake Farrow's comment and the link there.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

@Laszlo Mihaly If the hourglass was instead two cylinders with equal radii that were connected by a tube at their centers, would the center of mass be moving at a constant velocity?

Calvin Osborne - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Osborne Try "Hourglass Redux" in the Advanced section

Steven Chase - 3 years ago

@Calvin Osborne No. There is a small correction to that. Please look at the problem https://brilliant.org/weekly-problems/2018-05-21/advanced/?p=2 , and the experiment cited in the discussion .

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

There's this old story about a truck carrying a load of chickens in a closed container. He approaches a dubious bridge over the river, so he rouses the chickens so that they are all flying around. While they are in the air inside the container, he crosses the bridge minus the weight of the chickens.

Can this really work? This kind of question can be surprisingly difficult to analyze. But, let's say that there is a long sealed tube about a foot in diameter, and it's placed upon you. You only feel the weight of the tube itself initially. At the top of the tube, a bowling ball is dropped inside. What do you think you'll experience? This is the reason why it's not true that the weight of any object is necessarily the total mass of the object times gravitational acceleration. It's very easy to be confused about this. Another way of looking at this is to imagine the same sealed tube with the bowling ball inside it somewhere in the middle. You give one end a shove. You will not feel like you're pushing a bowling ball, because it probably will roll and stay put while the tube moves.

At any given moment, the downward force exerted by the hourglass is the weight of the sand that isn't in freefall (plus the glass). Which means once some sand starts to fall, the total weight is reduced by that amount of sand that is in flight. Once there is no more sand in freefall, the total weight resumes. Hence, the corrrect graph should show a slight reduction that stays more or less steady (assuming that the amount of sand in freefall is more or less steady) until all of the sand is at the bottom. [Okay, after reconsideration, I retract that and say there is no reduction once the flow is established and steady. See comments below.]

We can quibble about what happens in detail at the moment the sand starts to fall, and what happens when the final grains hit bottom (your green plot). But during a steady fall of sand, there shouldn't be much variation of the effective weight of the hourglass, with perhaps a slight ripple on account of individual grains not only leaving the top but hitting the bottom.

Michael Mendrin - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

"At any given moment, the downward force exerted by the hourglass is the weight of the sand that isn't in freefall (plus the glass)." Accordingly, the red graph should be correct. I do not agree with this. The impact of the sand hitting the bottom will give an extra force, that is approximately equal to the missing weight.

Assuming the rate of flow (mass per unit time) is f f , the force of the impacting sand is F = f v F=fv , where v = 2 g h v=\sqrt{2gh} is the velocity at the impact. The mass of the free-falling sand is m = f t m=f t , where t = 2 h / g t=\sqrt{2h/g} is the time-of-flight of a given grain of sand. The weight of the free-falling sand is F = m g = g f 2 h / g = f 2 g h F'=mg=gf\sqrt{2h/g}=f\sqrt{2gh} . It is clear that F = F F'=F . When the sand is in steady flow the balance will show the same weight as it shows when the hourglass have run out of sand.

As Steven Chase suggested, another way of getting the same conclusion is by realizing that the hourglass with the moving sand has a downward linear momentum that is constant in time. The hourglass with the sand stopped has a linear momentum of zero - also constant in time. Since the force relates to the change of the momentum, it has to be the same in both cases.

Imagine that we have a small valve that can start the hourglass without applying external force. The complete story is this: When the valve opens there will be a gradual decrease of the weight, as the sand grains start free-falling. When the first sand grain hits the bottom, the weight jumps back to the original, and it remains there until the sand starts to run out (or the valve is closed). There will be a gradual increase of the weight, ending at the moment the last grain of sand hits the bottom. This last part is depicted in the green graph.

All of this is valid is we assume that the length of the free fall h h does not change i.e. we neglect the pile-up of sand in the bottom container.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Okay, let me think about this, as something that is in continuous flow, like water flowing at a (near) constant speed in a pipe from a tank above to one below. What happens if a frame on a scale has some fixed weight that is steadily lowered at a constant rate? If the center of mass of the system is not accelerating, then there will be no change in weight. So, we need to examine whether or not the center of mass of the hourglass is accelerating or not. Since most of the time the transfer of mass from top to bottom is steady, there is no acceleration. The exceptions would be at the start or at the end, where the downward velocity of the center of mass is not constant, so we can expect some transient variations in total weight.

Going back to the truck full of chickens. If the chickens simply leaped just before crossing the bridge, and "fell back down on the other side", then, yes, the truck will be lighter during the crossing. However, if they only leaped momentarily many times during the crossing, then the truck will not be lighter. It gets more complicated when we consider flying chickens---again, what happens if the container is just a wire mesh frame?

Michael Mendrin - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Michael Mendrin I agree with you about the solution of the chicken problem. If, on the other hand, the chicken are flying in a closed container, the weight does not change. The chicken will create a downward airflow, that will push down the truck by the same amount as their weight. With a wire mesh, some of the airflow will push the ground outside of the truck, so the weight is a bit reduced.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Laszlo Mihaly The case of flying chickens in a truck is similiar to what happens if a big fan bolted on a sailboat is used to blow air directly on the sails. Will the boat move? The answer is, yes, it will move. The reason for this is a bit complicated.

Michael Mendrin - 3 years, 1 month ago

I don't think the center of mass has a constant momentum (as it would imply no acceleration). Normally the speed of the sand drop is higher when the upper part of the hourglass is full (Torricelli's law). So actually the sand flow is decreasing with time (otherwise hourglasses would be cylinder-shaped and not shaped like a paraboloid). Accordingly momentum of the center of mass is also changing with time. This implies a force and this force is the one which is read on the scale. Or I am missing something?

So to make the full picture in terms of center of mass: as the hourglass begins to flows, the center of mass accelerates "sharply" downward (freefall begins). Even though the flow already starts to slow down, the center of mass only starts to deccelerate as the sands hits the bottom part of the hourglass. The flow continues to slow down (due to Torricelli's law) and hence the center of mass continues to deccelerate, implying a larger reading on the scale.

Antoine G - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

@Antoine G Toricelli's law does not apply to the sand. Instead, the rate of flow is constant, independent of the height of the sand column and the shape of the container. This is not an exact statement either, but a much better approximation of reality.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

@Laszlo Mihaly Many thanks for correcting me on Torricelli! But still: the center of mass does not have constant momentum (unless I misunderstood the answers in the "Hourglass Redux" problem https://brilliant.org/weekly-problems/2018-05-21/advanced/?p=2 )

Antoine G - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

@Antoine G You are right, the center of mass does not have constant momentum. In my response I focused on the transient, when the flow stops. I had a disclaimer at the end of my reply "All of this is valid if we assume that the length of the free fall does not change i.e. we neglect the pile-up of sand in the bottom container." The "Hourglass Redux" problem addresses that issue, leading to a much smaller, but sustained and measurable, contribution to the weight.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

A hourglass is connected. Therefore the weight would not change. The movement of the sand makes no difference...the weight distribution may change. But the total weight would not.

Reggie Yancey - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

That is not true. Imagine that you put a big, closed box on the scale and a person in that box throws a big rock to the air. As long as the rock is in the air, the scale will show a lower weight.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

The movement of sand does matter.

Overall, the falling sand is being slowed in its downward motion--i.e. it is accelerating upward (!)

The acceleration of the sand is due to a net force acting on the sand. This force must come from the glass container around it and is directed upward. (Newton's Second Law)

If the glass container pushes upward on the sand, the sand pushes downward on the glass container. (Newton's Third Law)

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years ago

How is the weight overall after t2 less than before and at t1? Shouldn't it stay the same?

Jakob Berner - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

When the sand is flowing, the weight is slightly more that the weight after the sand stopped. This is discussed in detail in this problem: https://brilliant.org/weekly-problems/2018-05-21/advanced/?p=2

There is also a serious scientific study of this, with experiment, a https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1119/1.4973527

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

This makes kind of sense, but also it kind of doesn't. I will into it!

Jakob Berner - 3 years ago

I agree with you, the hourglass is a closed environment, the weight before t1 and after t2 should remain the same. No new grains were added or grains being removed. All lines in the solution that have the same weight t1 and after t2 is the blue line.

Alex Grecu - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

A person standing on a balance throws a big rock to the air. As long as the rock is in the air, the scale will show a lower weight. Put the person and the rock in a closed box. Will the result change?

Internal motion makes a difference.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

Actually this is a very interesting problem especially comparing it to the water flowing in the pipe as posed in the "basic" section!

Donát Herczeg - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Thanks. There is also a third problem, made up by Blake Farrow, in the "Advanced" section.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

but doesn't excess weight should also change as less grains are falling at a time

ch chaitanya - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

my guess is yes, because the height of sand in the upper part of the sand glass is getting smaller. By Torricelli's law the flow of sand leaving the upper part of the hourglass gets smaller. If you follow the link https://aapt.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1119/1.4973527 then you will see that the force starts to increases before t 1 t_1 .

Antoine G - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

In the cited article the weight starts to increase because the sand is running out of the upper container, and at that point the shape of the container becomes important. Toricelli's law does not apply to sand flow.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

@Laszlo Mihaly ok, great! thanks for pointing this out. Still the effect would also be there (in fact it would even stronger) with water instead of sand...?

Antoine G - 3 years ago

Quoting from this link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10035-006-0027-x , "Pressure and motion of dry sand: translation of Hagen’s paper from 1852"

Hagen’s work lays out the basis of the so-called hour- glass theory where the flow of granular material is found to be independent of the filling height in the container, thus allowing the measure of time with an hourglass.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

@Laszlo Mihaly thanks! very interesting!

Antoine G - 3 years ago

The "excess weight" is due to the sand grains hitting the top of the sand pile in the bottom container. The sand grains that are already falling do not know if the supply of sand runs out in the upper container, and therefore the excess weight does not change.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

If there is "missing" weight, then wouldn't the measured weight decrease instead of increasing between t1 and t2?

gun . - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

No. The stable, time-independent "missing weight" is a feature of the continuous sand flow. It is compensated by the force of the impacting sand.

When the sand runs out of the top container, the missing weight starts to decrease. As long as sand is hitting the bottom, the "compensation" is unchanged. That appears as an increase of the weight.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

Why is it that the two horizontal portions of the green line are not at the same level? They should be, shouldn't they? FWIW, the green curve is not very close at all to the curve in the referenced link.

Bert Seegmiller - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

The referenced link explains why the horizontal portions of the green line are at different levels. In essence, it is due to the fact that the length of the free falling sand column slowly decreases as the bottom container is filling up.

I think the green curve is pretty similar to the referenced link. They have more complicated model, and some details are different, but the essential features are the same. In the experiment some of the sharp jumps are rounded off. BTW, when I posted the problem I did not know about the referenced link, it was uncovered later by someone else.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

Either this or the solution from the 2. problem in the basic test (falling water with a pump) has a wrong answer.

Mark Wiens - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Could you please tell why?

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

The problem in basic is in steady state, since the water is falling all the time, and the height of the water column does not change. This one however, is changing state.

Nian Li - 3 years ago

What is the difference of this question and the second question in Basic?

Log in to reply

The situation in Basic is in a steady state , i.e. the state of the system (waterfall), including its center of mass, does not change, and the waterfall could run forever, in principle.

The situation here is not in a steady state; the state of the system changes, its center of mass moves downward; and at some time the sand stops flowing.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years ago

Shouldn’t the measured weight go DOWN whilst the last grain falls? It suddenly finds itself in a vacuum (presumably), ceases to exert force on the top cone, then exerts force again upon impact? Why is the profile not:

1
high low high'

where we can debate about whether high' > high ?

R Mathe - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

When the last grain starts to fall there are also lots of other grains in the air. Some of these are just hitting the lower pile of sound. As these grains keep hitting the ground, and there is no more grains coming after the last one, the weight will go up temporarily.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Ah, I see. I mistakenly thought the other grains are all completely at the bottom. I didn’t model it as a stream.

R Mathe - 3 years ago

the green line is not properly formed... the first and the last part should be in the straight line

bill dionyso - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

the weight is minimally increased at the time of impact but remains constant, does not decrease

bill dionyso - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Please see the paper referenced in my solution.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago
Michael Mendrin
May 20, 2018

See Blake Farrow's Hourglass Redux for a full explanation.

The green line does correctly show that there's a slight raise in the weight just before it jerks up at the end and settles down to its original weight.

The image is misleading. the weights before and after aren't equal.

Dario Goedtkindt - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

While it is hard to see, the 3rd line does have a slight decrease in weight before t 1 t_1 and after t 2 t_2 to reflect the slight increase in weight as the sand is falling.

Calvin Osborne - 3 years ago

Totally agree, the weights should be equal before and after.

Attila Kiss - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

The center of mass of the sand moves downward at a non-constant speed. This would be visible on the scale.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Then the center of mass should accelerate constantly for the line previous to t1 to be horizontal. How do we know that is the case?

Roger AB - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

@Roger Ab It isn't exactly constant, as I posted elsewhere. However, the time between t 1 t_1 and t 2 t_2 is very short, and at this order the gradual change in acceleration is likely not noticeable.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years ago

None of the lines is the right answer. The green shows that the total weight is less after t2 !!

AVass net - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

The problem does state that the graphs show what happens at the end when all of the sand has fallen. The slight increase in weight before was during the time the sand was falling.

Michael Mendrin - 3 years ago

Are these questions even being tested? There was a similar question to this one in "beginner" with a water pump on a scale pumping water up and splashing it downward. I put the weight would increase (due to the impulse created by the splash) but it was wrong and the answer was "the same". So now I'm at this question and I'm like "okay it's gotta be "the same" " since it was that for the water one. Nope, the answer is just as I thought: It would increase due to impulse. Who decides what questions appear as weekly challenges?? So inconsistent.

Rottie Robben - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

The Brilliant staff decides, but only after they've gone over these questions in depth before they post them. These problems really are all pretty difficult physics questions, where guessing can easily be wrong. This kind of thing doens't happen often.

The problem does state that the graphs show what happens at the end when all of the sand has fallen. The slight increase in weight before was during the time the sand was falling.

Michael Mendrin - 3 years ago

There are two differences between the two situations.

First, the question about the waterfall is about the steady state , while this problem focuses on "turning off" the process. If you'd turn off the waterfall, there would be a similar irregularity visible in the weight measurement.

Second, the matter in the waterfall remains on average at the same place, i.e. the center of mass remains stationary . With the hourglass, the center of mass of the sand moves downward. Due to the change in amount of falling sand and the varying cross-sectional area of the conic parts of the hourglass, this downward motion happens at varying velocity, resulting in an overall acceleration of the sand that can be measured.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years ago
Arunava Das
May 23, 2018

This Question came in InPhO 2018

In the InPho problem it is assumed that the sand is falling at constant height, see http://olympiads.hbcse.tifr.res.in/olympiads/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/INPhO2018-Solution-20180130.pdf . In reality, the height is slowly decreasing, due to the filling up of the lower reservoir and that causes a slightly larger weight during the steady state sand flow.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Very clever Laszlo

ted fedorowicz - 3 years ago

I haven't read more than 15 of the solutions and comments, but all seem to disregard the fact that the common definition of an hourglass is the COMPLETE device - the upper part and the lower part. You can't have an hourglass without both parts. So, if the "hourglass" sits and the scale (the problem statement does not say or suggest that only a portion of the hourglass is being measured) the scale should not change its reading. Please update the question and correct answer.

Peter N - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

You do not need to read all of the solutions, please read only mine. It does consider the full hourglass. Please let me know if you have a specific question.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

I have an alternate way of thinking. If I consider the fact that the Centre of Gravity of the hourglass is going down, which adds to the weight of the hourglass.

Pullak Barik - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

It is difficult to properly answer a question that is not clearly stated. If we are to consider a stream of particles, are we to consider the mechanics of clumping particles, and if so, do we need to know the shapes of the sand particles. We can go on and on in this vein. I am not sure that this problem can be sufficiently clearly stated that an accurate answer can be provided. I believe that a description can be provided of a completely theoretical object to which an accurate answer can be provided, but it will take more than a simple drawing to pose the problem.

Log in to reply

I disagree. This is not a theoretical question it is a practical one. hourglasses work pretty much independent of the questions you raise. Also, people actually did an experiment where they measured the weight, and they got a result similar to the green curve.

Laszlo Mihaly - 3 years ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...