How To Cut This Square?

Geometry Level 2

A square is cut into 37 squares, of which 36 have area 1 cm 2 1\text{ cm}^{ 2 } . What is the side length of the original square?

6 cm 6 \text{ cm} 7 cm 7 \text{ cm} 8 cm 8 \text{ cm} 9 cm 9\text{ cm} 10 cm 10\text{ cm}

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

5 solutions

Sravanth C.
Mar 21, 2016

We are given:

area of 36 squares with side 1 + area of 1 square with side x = area of the original square with side y \begin{aligned} \text{area of 36 squares with side 1}&+\text{area of 1 square with side x}\\ &=\text{area of the original square with side y} \end{aligned}

36 + x 2 = y 2 6 2 + x 2 = y 2 \begin{aligned} 36+x^2&=y^2\\ 6^2+x^2&=y^2 \end{aligned}

We can observe that this forms a Pythagorean triplet, and we know that the general formula for the Pythagorean triplet is: ( 2 m ) 2 + ( m 2 1 ) 2 = ( m 2 + 1 ) 2 (2m)^2+(m^2-1)^2=(m^2+1)^2

Substituting m = 3 m=3 , we get; ( 2 × 3 ) 2 + ( 3 2 1 ) 2 = ( 3 2 + 1 ) 2 6 2 + 8 2 = 1 0 2 \begin{aligned} (2\times 3)^2+(3^2-1)^2&=(3^2+1)^2\\ 6^2+8^2&=10^2 \end{aligned}

Thus, x = 8 x=8 and y = 10 y=10 . Hence the side of the original square was 10 cm 10\text{ cm} .

From the question we have area of 36 unit squares+area of a square with side y y =area of bigger square with side x x 36 + y 2 = x 2 \Rightarrow 36+y^2=x^2 On rearranging and factorising we get ( x + y ) ( x y ) = 36 \Rightarrow (x+y)(x-y)=36 Now we could factor out 36 in a number of ways like 1×36 or 2×18 or 3×12 etc. But only 2×18 yield positive whole number solutions for x x & y y i.e. ( x + y ) ( x y ) = 18 × 2 \Rightarrow (x+y)(x-y)=18×2 \Rightarrow x+y=18 and \Rightarrow x-y=2 This leads us to x x or length of bigger side as 10 \boxed{10}

Moderator note:

This solution makes the assumption that the larger square must have integer sides, which sounds reasonable but needs slight work to demonstrate.

Here I looked for natural number solutions because of the options.

Chaitnya Shrivastava - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Ideally, the solution should be indepenent of the choices, unless it references them. E.g. "Which of the following is ..."

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

So is there any other way other than sarvanth's method that leads to a solution without assumptions. I mean what is the slight work to which challenge master referred to.

Chaitnya Shrivastava - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Chaitnya Shrivastava See Julian's comment in the other solution.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

@Calvin Lin Okay I understood! Thank you and her

Chaitnya Shrivastava - 5 years, 2 months ago
Angela Fajardo
Mar 15, 2016

Since the original figure is a square, it's area is a squared number. Since the 36 squares have an area of 1 square cm, the sides of each square (the 36 squares) is 1 cm. Their total area is 36 square cm. From the choices, if you subtract 36 from them the answer should be a perfect square.

10 * 10 = 100

100 - 36 = 64

64 = 8^2

8 is the side length of the larger square

and 10 cm is the side length of the original square

You're making a slight assumption that the sides of the original figure must be an integer. Why must this be the case?

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

At least two edges of the original figure will not be touching the smaller square, so these need to be filled with 1x1 squares, and if the side length is not an integer, this wouldn't be possible.

Julian Yu - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Good observation :)

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 2 months ago

The answer is in the choices and all of the choices are whole numbers. I did a trial and error. But if there are no choices, I would probably be looking for a squared number if subtracted by 36, the result would also be a squared number (Squared number because the area of a square is its side length multiplied to another side length). Besides that, I'm lost.

Angela Fajardo - 5 years, 3 months ago

You make a typo on the last line. It should be 10cm, the length of original square and not the length of single-larger square

Kay Xspre - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Sorry my mistake thanks :)

Angela Fajardo - 5 years, 3 months ago
Venkatachalam J
Mar 15, 2017
Chew-Seong Cheong
Mar 31, 2016

Let the 3 7 t h 37^{th} or the larger square to have a side length m m ; m m must be a natural number otherwise the 36 36 1 -cm 2 1\text{-cm}^2 squares cannot be laid beside it to have straight edges. The 37 37 squares can put together to form the original square as follows, where the larger square is in pink and the blue region is covered by the 36 36 1 -cm 2 1\text{-cm}^2 squares. Again n n must be a natural number.

We note that: n 2 + 2 m n = 36 m = 36 n 2 2 n = ( 6 n ) ( 6 + n ) 2 n n^2 + 2mn = 36 \quad \Rightarrow m = \dfrac{36-n^2}{2n} = \dfrac{(6-n)(6+n)}{2n} . It can be seen that for integer m m , n n must be even and for m > 0 m > 0 , n < 6 n < 6 .

Therefore, n n can only be 2 2 or 4 4 { n = 2 m = 8 n = 4 m = 2.5 rejected \Rightarrow \begin{cases} n = 2 & \Rightarrow m = 8 \\ n = 4 & \Rightarrow \color{#D61F06}{m = 2.5 \text{ rejected}} \end{cases}

So the side length of the original square is m + n = 8 + 2 = 10 m+n = 8+2 = \boxed{10}

Moderator note:

Why must the large square be flushed against a corner of the original square?

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...