It's obvious that 4 = 2 2 .
Can we also express 4 4 4 as n 2’s 2 2 2 ⋅ ⋅ 2 ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
@Pi Han Goh The answer if fine, but I just thought I should point out that in your second example, 4 4 = 2 8 = 2 2 3 and not 2 2 2 2 = 2 2 4 .
Log in to reply
It actually made myself doubt myself... But i won my internal debate ;)
Log in to reply
Thanks. I've removed the second paragraph.
In future, if you spot any errors with a problem, you can “report” it by selecting "report problem" in the “line line line” menu in the bottom right corner. This will notify the problem creator who can fix the issues.
Log in to reply
@Brilliant Mathematics – Yeah I know but I read Brian's comment and thought them it won't be needed
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
4 4 4 = 4 ( 2 2 ) 4 = 4 2 8 = ( 2 2 ) 2 8 = 2 2 9 .
Since 9 cannot be expressed as a "power tower" of 2 's, 4 4 4 cannot be expressed as a power tower of 2 's either, so the answer is No .