How Many Quintessential Numbers Satisfy This Property?

The sum of all the positive divisors of this number is twice the original number.

Which of the following number satisfy the property above?

4 5 6 7

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

Swapnil Das
Aug 25, 2016

Relevant wiki: Sum of Factors

  • The positive divisors of 6 6 are 1 1 , 2 2 , 3 3 and 6 6 . Their sum is 1 + 2 + 3 + 6 = 12 = 6 × 2 1+2+3+6=12= 6 \times 2 .
  • Such numbers are called perfect numbers .

The title of the problem is fairly interesting, being one the famous unsolved problems of mathematics, till date. \text{The title of the problem is fairly interesting, being one the famous unsolved problems of mathematics, till date.}

Moderator note:

Yes, for completeness, one should show that the other 3 numbers listed does not satisfy this criteria.

You might also notice the following observations:

  • If p p is a prime number , then the sum of all the positive divisors of p p is p + 1 p+1 .

  • The sum of all the positive divisors of a power of 2, 2 n 2^n is equal to 2 n + 1 1 2^{n+1} - 1 .

You got the reference! Well doneeeeeeeee

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks a lot :)

Swapnil Das - 4 years, 9 months ago

why 4 and 5 cannot include their..?

A Former Brilliant Member - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

cannot include their what?

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 9 months ago

I got the question correct but when you say 'odd numbers' in the title, I was thinking that no known odd numbers satisfy being a perfect number. Perhaps an edit on the title to stop any confusion?

Sharky Kesa - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Sure, go ahead and change the title

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Pi Han Goh What do you think of Quintessential?

Sharky Kesa - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Sharky Kesa Sure. It works!

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 9 months ago
Brock Brown
Sep 3, 2016

Python 2.7:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
# cracking a nut with a sledgehammer
def property(n):
    total = n
    for i in xrange(1,n/2+1):
        if n%i == 0: total += i
    return total == 2*n
for n in (4, 5, 6, 7):
    if property(n):
        print "Answer:", n

This is the perfect solution.

Pi Han Goh - 4 years, 9 months ago
Anandmay Patel
Aug 26, 2016

Just had an idea:The first 2 options are eliminated without any calculation as they are prime.If we consider a function f,such that it relates all natural numbers to their respective 'sum of all divisors',then f(p)=p+1,for every prime p.So, as primes can not satisfy this property,many odds are deleted to examine them for the property:)

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...