How many, not only 5-digit, perfect squares can we make with only these digits: 0 , 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 ?(Don't count 0 as a perfect square!) We can use every digit only one time.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I have a small correction - All square numbers end with an even number of 0's not just 0.
Log in to reply
Yes @Yashvardhan Pattanashetti , but they still end with a zero, don't they?
Log in to reply
they end with 0's not a single 'zero'
√ 3 6 = 6 .
There's no other square numbers.
Therefore, the answer is 1 .
@Yajat Shamji : How did you only get 3 6 ? Aren't 3 6 0 0 and 3 6 0 0 0 0 also perfect squares using those digits?
Log in to reply
@Ved Pradhan We have only one 0, Ved. Square numbers must end with even number of 0's, but we have only one 0, and 1 is odd.
Log in to reply
@Yashvardhan Pattanashetti : When I solved the problem and wrote this comment, you hadn't yet said that you can only use each digit once. Now that you have written, your answer is correct.
Log in to reply
@Ved Pradhan – Yeah, I guess Pall hadn't updated it.
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Oh, sorry, I meant @Páll Márton , not you.
Log in to reply
@Ved Pradhan – By the way how do you mention me?( @Hamza Anushath , @Yajat Shamji , @Ved Pradhan ) copy/paste?
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – No, I type in the @ sign, followed by your name with no spaces, then I click on your name when it shows up in the drop down menu. I'm on an iPad, so I can easily type the accents.
@A Former Brilliant Member – Yeah, Ved, how do you mention Pall, the a'-thingy makes it hard for me to mention him.
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – @Yashvardhan Pattanashetti : I'm on an iPad, so it's easier to type the accent. When I'm on a computer, I use copy paste.
Log in to reply
@Ved Pradhan – Nice! Copy/Paste doesn't work for me, for some reason
@Ved Pradhan – I have added to my keybord languages Russian and Greek
@A Former Brilliant Member – Hahaha! This is a don't disturb me name :) alt+160
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Does that really work? I don't think these alt commands work on my computer for some reason.
Log in to reply
@Ved Pradhan – I think this should be work. You hold press the left-alt button, type 160 .
@A Former Brilliant Member – Alt command worked for me, now Pall will be disturbed a lot. Evil Laugh
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – This is very practical: d+evil=devil like beelzebub :)
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Beelzebub?? @Páll Márton ??
Log in to reply
In theological sources, predominantly Christian, Beelzebub is sometimes another name for the Devil, similar to Satan.( from wikipedia )
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Oh, Ok. Beelzebub = Satan = Devil = d + evil
Got it.
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Sometimes I read the Bible in English when I get bored.
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – OK, when I'm bored, I read all the drama happening on yesterday's daily problem, did you see it? I caught someone with an alternate account and Brilliant staff said that creating alternate accounts were wrong.
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Waww! How did you do it?
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – In rocket fuel reaction, she kind of said in her solution that the account wasn't hers and told everyone to upvote her real account's solutions. When staff posted that there was suspicious activity, I told him about it.
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Nisha Anushath?
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Yes, Hamza Anushath posted through her sister's account. She wrote an apology to Brilliant too.
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Seriously? I...
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Wait! His is instead of her is. Or in this situation her? Because Hamza is a boy.
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – without is :)
@A Former Brilliant Member – Wot??? Mind Blown!!!
@A Former Brilliant Member – You mean: Woww!
o instead of a
Log in to reply
@A Former Brilliant Member – Why? This is hard for me, because in my language the sounds are written differently.
@A Former Brilliant Member – BTW, can you tell me if my answer is with or without brute-force?(answer posted as comment under your solution) =D
@Yajat Shamji , @Páll Márton , Guys, reply here, coz when we have a long thread, it becomes really narrow until it appears letter by letter.
Log in to reply
Ok! You wrote that her sister instead of his sister .
Unfortunately I have to learn 7 poems today. See you at the daily challange.
@Yajat Shamji Can you delete your solution and write again? Because there are many comments...
Log in to reply
Hi Pall, you learnt 7 poems quickly! It takes me a day to learn a paragraph!
Who will write a correct solution first? Some help:
Can somebody solve that without brute-force? I can :)
I have done it. But I used logic, not brute force, @Páll Márton
@Yajat Shamji and @Hamza Anushath how did you get only 36?
Same question as @Ved Pradhan , aren't there infinitely many such numbers using 0 s in the end?
Log in to reply
Ok. I fixed that.
@Vinayak Srivastava We have only one 0, Vinayak. Square numbers must end with even number of 0's, but we have only one 0, and 1 is odd. Hope that answered your question.
Log in to reply
No, the question did not specify that when I commented it. Now its correct.
Log in to reply
@Vinayak Srivastava – Yes. Only now is the task right.
The complete, logical answer without using brute-force -
0, 7, 8, 3 are useless in the units place as all square numbers end with either an even number of 0's or 1, 4, 5, 6, 9. So we have 6 in the units place. 0 can't be used without a hundreds digit and 6 is used up. 76 and 86 aren't squares so we have 36, our first(and only) square number. 36
I guess I have also kind-of, used brute-force. :)
Log in to reply
That's not brute force, that's pure logic! @Yashvardhan Pattanashetti
Log in to reply
Thanks, but I'm not so sure. What do you think @Páll Márton ??
A better logical solution than mine has been posted here by @Hamza Anushath .
Log in to reply
@Yashvardhan Pattanashetti , thanks a lot!
Log in to reply
Your method is much easier to use.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Therefore, the only number that is a candidate is 3 6 , which is the square of 6