n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ n n 3 + k k 2 + k
If the above limit results as q p , where p and q are positive coprime integers, what is the value of p + q ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Can I take n^3 as the common factor in the denominator in the first step and make k/n^3 = 0 ?? It makes the solution simpler but I don't know whether it is correct.
Let us write S n = k = 1 ∑ n n 3 + k k 2 + k . We can write this partial sum as a unique fraction instead of a sum of fractions, by changing their denominators : S n = n 3 + 1 1 2 + 1 + ⋯ + n 3 + n n 2 + n = ∏ i = 1 n ( n 3 + i ) 1 × k = 1 ∑ n ⎝ ⎛ ( k 2 + k ) × i = k ∏ ( n 3 + i ) ⎠ ⎞ Asymptotically, as n → ∞ we can say that we have ∏ i = 1 n ( n 3 + i ) 1 ∼ n − 3 n and k = 1 ∑ n ⎝ ⎛ ( k 2 + k ) × i = k ∏ ( n 3 + i ) ⎠ ⎞ ∼ k = 1 ∑ n ( k 2 + k ) n 3 ( n − 1 ) . Since k = 1 ∑ n ( k 2 + k ) = k = 1 ∑ n k 2 + k = 1 ∑ n k = 6 n ( n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 ) + 2 n ( n + 1 ) = 6 2 n 3 + 6 n 2 + 4 n ∼ 6 2 n 3 we can now rewrite S n ∼ n − 3 n 3 1 n 3 n 3 n − 3 ∼ 3 1 . Hence the result: k = 1 ∑ n n 3 + k k 2 + k n → ∞ q p where p = 1 , q = 3 which leads to p + q = 4 .
Can you explain your reasoning for the following?
∏ i = 1 n ( n 3 + i ) 1 ∼ n − 3 n
k = 1 ∑ n ⎝ ⎛ ( k 2 + k ) × i = k ∏ ( n 3 + i ) ⎠ ⎞ ∼ k = 1 ∑ n ( k 2 + k ) n 3 ( n − 1 )
Log in to reply
Yes, excuse me, it is true that it is not so clear. I must say that I did this somehow "mechanically", since it sounded right to me. Here is how I would try to explain that.
For the first one, since all the terms in the product are positive numbers, we have i = 1 ∏ n ( n 3 + i ) ≤ i = 1 ∏ n ( n 3 + n ) ≤ ( n 3 + n ) n ≤ n 3 n ( 1 + n 2 1 ) n and, similarly, i = 1 ∏ n ( n 3 + i ) ≥ i = 1 ∏ n ( n 3 + 0 ) ≥ n 3 n .
Therefore, we have 1 ≤ n 3 n ∏ i = 1 n ( n 3 + i ) ≤ ( 1 + n 2 1 ) n .
Thanks to Taylor expansions, ( 1 + n 2 1 ) n = exp ( n ln ( 1 + n 2 1 ) ) n → ∞ = exp ( n ( n 2 1 + o ( n 2 1 ) ) ) n → ∞ = 1 + n 1 + o ( n 1 ) which shows that ( 1 + n 2 1 ) n n → ∞ 1 and allows us to conclude that n 3 n ∏ i = 1 n ( n 3 + i ) n → ∞ 1 .
For the second one, the process is quite the same : ∑ i = 1 n ( k 2 + k ) n 3 ( n − 1 ) ∑ i = 1 n ( ( k 2 + k ) × ∏ i = k ( n 3 + i ) ) = ∑ i = 1 n ( k 2 + k ) 1 × n 3 ( n − 1 ) ∑ i = 1 n ( ( k 2 + k ) × ∏ i = k ( n 3 + i ) ) = ∑ i = 1 n ( k 2 + k ) 1 × i = 1 ∑ n ( ( k 2 + k ) × n 3 ( n − 1 ) ∏ i = k ( n 3 + i ) ) and for the same reason as for the very first equation of this message, we have ∑ i = 1 n ( k 2 + k ) n 3 ( n − 1 ) ∑ i = 1 n ( ( k 2 + k ) × ∏ i = k ( n 3 + i ) ) ≤ ∑ i = 1 n ( k 2 + k ) 1 × i = 1 ∑ n ( ( k 2 + k ) × n 3 ( n − 1 ) ∏ i = k ( n 3 + n ) ) ≤ ∑ i = 1 n ( k 2 + k ) 1 × ( i = 1 ∑ n ( k 2 + k ) ) × n 3 ( n − 1 ) ( n 3 + n ) n − 1 ≤ n 3 ( n − 1 ) ( n 3 + n ) n − 1 hence 1 ≤ ∑ i = 1 n ( k 2 + k ) n 3 ( n − 1 ) ∑ i = 1 n ( ( k 2 + k ) × ∏ i = k ( n 3 + i ) ) ≤ ( 1 + n 2 1 ) n − 1 . which leads to the conclusion ∑ i = 1 n ( k 2 + k ) n 3 ( n − 1 ) ∑ i = 1 n ( ( k 2 + k ) × ∏ i = k ( n 3 + i ) ) n → ∞ 1 .
It is still possible that I made a mistake somewhere, of course, but I tried to be as clear as possible.
Log in to reply
It looks good to me. The only reason why I asked was that your first solution was dangerously close to suggesting something like ( ∀ k , a k , n ∼ b k , n ) ⟹ ∏ k = 1 n a k , n ∼ ∏ k = 1 n b k , n ∑ k = 1 n a k , n ∼ ∑ k = 1 n b k , n which of course isn't true in general--it needs some more assumptions on the trangular arrays a k , n , b k , n in order to be true.
I still like my solution more ;-), but I can vote yours up now.
Log in to reply
@Brian Moehring – I see ! I must say that your solution is shorter and lighter. But mine shows a different path leading to the solution, which is why I posted it ;) Having that said, it was a good way for me to dig deeper in a proof. Thank you ! P.S. : could you tell me more about the required assumptions you mention ?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We can compare the two sums J n = k = 1 ∑ n n 3 + k k 2 + k , I n = k = 1 ∑ n n 3 k 2 as ∣ J n − I n ∣ = ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ k = 1 ∑ n ( n 3 + k k 2 + k − n 3 k 2 ) ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ = k = 1 ∑ n n 3 ( n 3 + k ) k ( n 3 − k 2 ) ≤ n ⋅ 1 ≤ k ≤ n max n 3 ( n 3 + k ) k ( n 3 − k 2 ) ≤ n ⋅ n 3 ( n 3 + 0 ) n ( n 3 − 0 ) = n 1 n → ∞ 0
This allows us to conclude n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ n n 3 + k k 2 + k = n → ∞ lim J n = n → ∞ lim I n = n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ n ( n k ) 2 ⋅ n 1 = ∫ 0 1 x 2 d x = 3 1 x 3 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ 0 1 = 3 1
and therefore p + q = 1 + 3 = 4