A with a certain velocity on the highway. Point C is in the grassland at a distance l from the highway and he wants to get there as soon as possible. However, his speed is Q times slower walking on grass than on highway. At what distance x ( A D > x ) from point D should he change his path so that he reaches point C in minimum time.
A person starts walking from pointAssume l = 9 m , Q = 1 0 2 1 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
This is a really nice solution, Yash. I don't think I've ever seen this TIR approach before for this type of question.
Log in to reply
........actually the problem is from I.E. IRODOV.....but i wanted to share my method..... although i dont know if anyone has thought it before......
Log in to reply
Thanks bro for giving us a literal conceptual question
Nice to know other people thought of this too. I was very excited to discover this on my own. Later I found that this was there in the class 12 textbook of CBSE syllabus. :/ so much for the excitement.
Log in to reply
@Raghav Vaidyanathan – well i really didnt know about that.......i was just excited just like you were.........thanks for telling bro........
When shortest time is asked, four words come to mind: Fermat's principle, Snell's Law.
What is meant by Q times slower?
Log in to reply
if he travels with a velocity v on highway.............he travels with (v/Q) in grassland
Yash has provided an elegant solution, so I'll provide the 'boring' one.
Let ∣ A D ∣ = d , and let v be the person's speed on the highway. Then the time of travel from A to C is given by the equation
t = v d − x + 1 0 v x 2 + l 2 .
Now since d and l are constants, the derivative with respect to x is
d x d t = − v 1 + v x 2 + l 2 1 0 ∗ x .
To find any extrema, we set this equal to 0 , which gives us
x 2 + l 2 = 1 0 ∗ x ⟹ x 2 + l 2 = 1 0 x 2 ⟹ 9 x 2 = l 2 ⟹ x = 3 l .
So with l = 9 m we end up with x = 3 m.
To demonstrate that this value yields a minimum, note that
d x 2 d 2 t = v ( x 2 + l 2 ) 2 3 1 0 ∗ l 2 > 0 ,
and thus by the second derivative test any extrema will be a minimum.
thank u sir for the complement.............and your solution is also nice..one............after all nothing in physics is boring.......
Log in to reply
Haha. You're right; all physics is interesting, especially when it's looked at from a new angle. :)
Same question see my solution
Log in to reply
honestly bro..........i did not see that solution before.........
Log in to reply
No no not at all .I was just showing that i did the same that's all.I don't doubt u.
Refractive index method is not applied as the case is not usual.
Refractive index method is the basis of this question which does not apply calculus. Sorry for using calculus here but I think the concept is also good. There was a question in year 2014 about running on the beach and jumping into the sea which was similar to this question.
Like Yash I solved this using the analogy with optics.
I imagined the light ray going from C, through B to A.
The refracted ray BA lies along the boundary.
So CBD is the critical angle which is related to the refractive index 1 0 by
sin C B D = 1 0 1
From this it follows easily that
tan C B D = 3 1
and so
B D = 3 9 = 3
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...