Find the number of positive integers a , b and c such that
a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = a 2 b 2
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Thanks a lot to post the solution. I wanted that.
Log in to reply
you're welcome. I hope you can understand it. I'm not very good with English, but you can ask me if you have some doubt...
Log in to reply
Yes, i read about this method today.
Its called FMID variant.
Log in to reply
@Priyanshu Mishra – I hope to finish my proof, but give me some time,please. I'm very busy right now.
@Priyanshu Mishra – Fermat used this method for proving that the equation x 4 + y 4 = z 4 doesn't have no trivial integers solutions, and this implies that the equation x 4 n + y 4 n = z 4 n ≡ ( x n ) 4 + ( y n ) 4 = ( y n ) 4 doesn't have no trivial integers solutions. For instance, x 1 2 + y 1 2 = z 1 2 doesn`t have no trivial integers solutions. Indeed for demonstrating the last Fermat theorem, it's sufficient to prove that the equation x p + y p = z p doesn't have no trivial integers solutions with p a prime number, which Wiles did using "Taniyama-Shimura"... joininig two branches of mathematics, elliptic curves and algebraic number theory...
Log in to reply
@Guillermo Templado – Thanks , i understand that.
Thankyou also, for going so deep and discussing.
Here's are a solution:
After some algebraic manipulation we get the following:
a 2 + b 2 + c 2 = a 2 b 2 ⟹ ( a − 1 ) ( a + 1 ) ( b − 1 ) ( b + 1 ) = c 2 + 1
Now if we have an odd prime p which divides the LHS, then − 1 must be a quadratic residue ( m o d p ) .
Since ( p − 1 ) L ≡ ( − 1 ) 2 p − 1 ( m o d p ) . (Using Legendre symbol and Euler's criterion )
p ≡ 1 ( m o d 4 ) must be true if p is an odd prime.
However, if either a or b is even, then the LHS is divisible by a positive integer which leaves a remainder of 3 when divided by 4 and thus is divisible by a prime which leaves a remainder of 3 when divided by 4 , which implies that a , b and c must be odd.
Now, a = 2 x + 1 , b = 2 y + 1 , c = 2 z + 1 for non-negative integers x , y , z .
After substitution and some algebraic manipulation we get, 8 x ( x + 1 ) y ( y + 1 ) = z ( z + 1 ) + 1 , where LHS is clearly even and RHS is clearly odd.
Hence, there are no positive integers a , b , c which solve this diophantine equation. □
Thanks for the nice and good solution.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The following method was used by Fermat, and is known as the infinite descent method a 2 ≡ 0 , 1 ( m o d 4 ) , b 2 ≡ 0 , 1 ( m o d 4 ) , c 2 ≡ 0 , 1 ( m o d 4 ) . This implies that a 2 b 2 ≡ 0 ( m o d 4 ) . , It's not possible a 2 b 2 ≡ 1 ( m o d 4 ) because if this were true a 2 b 2 = a 2 + b 2 + c 2 mod 4 .
Then there exists 5 possibilities. I'm going only to treat the following possibility: a = 4 k , b = 4 l , c = 4 m ⇒ 1 6 ( l 2 + k 2 + m 2 ) = 2 5 6 l 2 k 2 ⇒ l 2 + k 2 + m 2 = 1 6 k 2 l 2 .
Continuing this method, descending we'll get the equation WLOG 1 2 + 1 2 + c 2 = 1 6 n , n ≥ 1 , but this equation doesn't have any integer c fullfiling it. So the equation above doesn't have any solution with a , b , c positive integers...
Note.- There are 4 cases more for analyzing. I hope to finish this proof... Meanwhile the other 4 cases are left as an exercise to the reader