Infinate Resistance Problem

A series circuit is such that there are infinitely many resistors in series shown in the diagram.

Find the total resistance in Ω \Omega .


The answer is 2.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Jacob Morris
May 10, 2018

Question credit - https://isaacphysics.org/

The trick is to spot that the resistance changes by a factor of 1 2 \frac{1}{2} , making this a geometric series.

N.B - For a gemotric series with first term a a and common difference r r , the sum of the first n n terms is given by:

S n = a ( r n 1 ) 1 r {S_n } = \frac{a(r^n-1)}{1-r}

If r < 1 |r|<1

S = a 1 r {S_\infty} = \frac{a}{1-r}

Since our geometric series is in terms of R R we can deduce the total resistance by finding the sum approaching infinity using the above formula.

a = 1 a=1
r = 1 2 r=\frac{1}{2}

S = 1 1 1 2 = 2 Ω {S_\infty} = \frac{1}{1- \frac{1}{2}} = 2\Omega

You need to change the labelling of the n n th resistor in the picture, it should read 2 - n Ω 2^{\text{-}n} \Omega or 1 2 n Ω \frac{1}{2^n} \Omega .

zico quintina - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Hi, can you elaborate please?

Jacob Morris - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

If you mean the resistance of the nth resistor then it's technically (1/2)^n-1 ohms but that gives the game away so for the problems sake it's easier to leave the resistance as n.

Jacob Morris - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Jacob Morris I understand you not wanting to give the game away, but then you should leave the label blank or call it x Ω x \ \Omega . If you leave it as is, n Ω n \ \Omega means that the resistance of a resistor matches its position (because underneath it says position n n ), i.e. the 6 6 th resistor is 6 Ω 6 \ \Omega , the 13 13 th resistor is 13 Ω 13 \ \Omega , etc., which is false.

zico quintina - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Zico Quintina I agree but your formula isn't correct. I'll change it to k when I get time

Jacob Morris - 3 years, 1 month ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...