INMO 2016 proposal from IISc

Algebra Level 5

f ( x ) 2 ( 1 + x ) x [ 1 , ) x f ( x + 1 ) = ( f ( x ) ) 2 1 x [ 1 , ) \begin{aligned} f(x) & \le 2(1+x) & \forall x \in [1, \infty) \\ x f (x+1) & = (f(x))^2 - 1 & \forall x \in [ 1,\infty ) \end{aligned}

A function f : [ 1 , ) [ 1 , ) f:[1, \infty) \rightarrow [1, \infty) satisfy the conditions above. Find f ( 2016 ) f(2016) .


The answer is 2017.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

This is a nice little problem. Note that from the second functional equation, we get, ( f ( x ) ) 2 2 x ( 2 + x ) + 1 = 2 ( 1 + x ) 2 1 < 2 ( 1 + x ) 2 f ( x ) < 2 ( 1 + x ) (f(x))^2\le 2x(2+x)+1=2(1+x)^2-1<2(1+x)^2\implies f(x)<\sqrt{2}(1+x) . This in turn implies ( f ( x ) ) 2 < 2 x ( x + 2 ) + 1 = 2 ( x + 1 ) 2 + 1 2 < 2 ( 1 + x ) 2 f ( x ) < 2 1 / 4 ( 1 + x ) (f(x))^2<\sqrt{2}x(x+2)+1=\sqrt{2}(x+1)^2+1-\sqrt{2}<\sqrt{2}(1+x)^2\implies f(x)<2^{1/4}(1+x) . Continuing in this manner we see that, for any x [ 1 , ] x\in [1,\infty] , f ( x ) < a n ( 1 + x ) f(x)<a_n(1+x) , for all n 0 n\ge 0 , where a n = 2 1 / 2 n a_n=2^{1/2^n} . Hence, for any x [ 1 , ] x\in [1,\infty] f ( x ) / ( 1 + x ) inf n a n = 1 f(x)/(1+x)\le \inf_{n}a_n=1 .

Now, let a [ 1 , ] \exists a\in [1,\infty] such that f ( a ) = 1 + a ϵ 0 f(a)=1+a-\epsilon_0 for some a ϵ 0 > 0 a\ge \epsilon_0>0 . Then, a f ( a + 1 ) = f 2 ( a ) 1 a f ( a + 1 ) = a ( a + 2 ) + ϵ 0 2 2 ( a + 1 ) ϵ 0 f ( a + 1 ) = a + 2 ϵ 1 af(a+1)=f^2(a)-1\implies af(a+1)=a(a+2)+\epsilon_0^2-2(a+1)\epsilon_0\implies f(a+1)=a+2-\epsilon_1 where ϵ 1 = 2 ( a + 1 ) ϵ 0 / a ϵ 0 2 / a = 2 ϵ 0 + 2 ϵ 0 ϵ 0 2 a ϵ 0 ( 1 + 2 / a ) = ρ ϵ 0 \epsilon_1=2(a+1)\epsilon_0/a-\epsilon_0^2/a=2\epsilon_0+\frac{2\epsilon_0-\epsilon_0^2}{a}\ge \epsilon_0(1+2/a)=\rho \epsilon_0 where ρ = 1 + 2 / a > 1 \rho=1+2/a>1 . Similarly, f ( a + 2 ) = a + 3 ϵ 2 f(a+2)=a+3-\epsilon_2 , where ϵ 2 ρ ϵ 1 \epsilon_2\ge\rho \epsilon_1 . Thus, we can find a sequence { ϵ n } \{\epsilon_n\} such that f ( a + n ) = a + 1 ϵ n , n 0 f(a+n)=a+1-\epsilon_{n}, \ n\ge 0 , where ϵ n > ρ n ϵ 0 \epsilon_n>\rho^n \epsilon_0 . Thus, f ( a + n ) < a + 1 ρ n ϵ 0 f(a+n)<a+1-\rho^n \epsilon_0 . But, f ( x ) 1 f(x)\ge 1 , x [ 1 , ] \forall x\in [1,\infty] . This implies that n 0 , ρ n ϵ 0 < a \forall n\ge 0, \rho^n \epsilon_0<a , which is clearly not possible, since ρ > a \rho >a . This gives a contradiction to the assumption that f ( a ) < 1 + a f(a)<1+a .

So, there cannot be point x x where f ( x ) < 1 + x f(x)<1+x , and hence, f ( x ) = 1 + x x [ 1 , ) f(x)=1+x\ \forall x\in [1,\infty) . Thus the desired answer is 2017 \boxed{2017} .

Thanks. The solution is pretty simple to understand. Upvoted.

Priyanshu Mishra - 4 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

My previous line of argument to show that f ( x ) < 1 + x f(x)<1+x is not possible for any x 1 x\ge 1 , was flawed. I have changed the argument and therefore the proof for that part.

Samrat Mukhopadhyay - 4 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, i noticed now. Thanks for initiative.

Priyanshu Mishra - 4 years, 8 months ago

That is a nice one.🖒🖒

rajdeep brahma - 3 years, 5 months ago
Arjen Vreugdenhil
Sep 22, 2016

If there is a polynomial function satisfying these conditions, then we have a solution and don't need to look any further. Note : This is a pragmatic approach, assuming that the solution is unique without proving it!

So let f ( x ) f(x) be a polynomial of degree n n . In the second equation, the degree of the lhs is d + 1 d + 1 and on the rhs it is 2 d 2d . Equation this shows d = 1 d = 1 , so f = a x + b f = ax + b is linear.

Substituting this in the bottom equation we get a x 2 + ( a + b ) x = a 2 x 2 + 2 a b x + b 2 1. ax^2 + (a+b)x = a^2x^2 + 2abx + b^2-1. Equating the coefficients gives { a = a 2 , a + b = 2 a b , 0 = b 2 1. \begin{cases} a = a^2, \\ a+b = 2ab, \\ 0 = b^2-1. \end{cases} It is easy to see that a = 1 a = 1 and b = 1 b = 1 . Thus a polynomial function f f satisfying the second condition must be f ( x ) = x + 1. f(x) = x+1. The condition f ( x ) = x + 1 2 ( x + 1 ) f(x) = x+1 \leq 2(x+1) is easily checked. Therefore we submit the solution f ( 2016 ) = 2016 + 1 = 2017 . f(2016) = 2016 + 1 = \boxed{2017}.

Edit : Proof that this is a unique solution

By popular request I will pay my debt and prove that this function is unique.

Let f ( x ) = x + 1 + g ( x ) f(x) = x + 1 + g(x) . The conditions translate into { g ( x ) < x + 1 g ( x + 1 ) = ( g ( x ) x + 2 + 2 x ) g ( x ) . \begin{cases} g(x) < x+1 \\ g(x+1) = \left(\frac{g(x)}x + 2 + \frac2x\right)g(x).\end{cases} Now suppose that for some x x , g ( x ) > 0 g(x) > 0 . Then the second equation implies g ( x + 1 ) > 2 g ( x ) , g(x+1) > 2g(x), and repeating it we get g ( x + n ) > 2 n g ( x ) . g(x+n) > 2^ng(x). This exponential function grows faster than any linear function, so that from a certain value of n n onward, g ( x + n ) > x + n + 1 g(x+n) > x+n+1 , in violation of the first condition. Therefore g ( x ) 0 g(x) \leq 0 for all x x .

Likewise, let g ( x ) < 0 g(x) < 0 for some x x . Since f ( x ) 1 f(x) \geq 1 we know g ( x ) x g(x) \geq -x . The expression g ( x ) / x + 2 + 2 / x g(x)/x + 2 + 2/x is positive, showing that g ( x + 1 ) < 2 g ( x ) g(x+1) < 2g(x) , and likewise g ( x + n ) < 2 n g ( x ) g(x+n) < 2^ng(x) . Again, we have an exponential function; for a certain value of n n onward, this implies g ( x + n ) > x + n |g(x+n)| > x+n , making f ( x + n ) < 1 f(x+n) < 1 in violation of the given domain. Therefore g ( x ) 0 g(x) \geq 0 for all x x .

We have now proven that g ( x ) = 0 g(x) = 0 on the entire domain, leaving f ( x ) = x + 1 f(x) = x+1 as the only solution.

Well, given that it is a proposed olympiad problem, the proof should determine all functions that satisfy the conditions.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

There exists only one function satisfying these two equations. From b 2 = 1 b^2=1 b = ± 1 b=\pm 1 Taking b = 1 b=1 that gives a = 1 a=1 and b = 1 b=-1 that gives a = 1 / 3 a=1/3 that will not satisfy a = a 2 a=a^2 . So only function is f ( x ) = x + 1 f(x)=x+1

Kushal Bose - 4 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Kunal I think what Calvin means is that we should search over the space of all possible functions and not just the polynomials.

Samrat Mukhopadhyay - 4 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Samrat Mukhopadhyay Yes it may be

Kushal Bose - 4 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Kushal Bose Yes, I think so. BTW sorry to call you Kunal earlier, that was a typo :P

Samrat Mukhopadhyay - 4 years, 8 months ago

@Kushal Bose Right. There are many functions that are not polynomial. I'm basically reiterating the first paragraph of Arjen's, then this approach only finds a possible solution, and doesn't determine all possible solutions to the functional equation.

Calvin Lin Staff - 4 years, 8 months ago

thanks, Calvin sir for pointing this out that we must show the solution's uniqueness my solution was also somewhat similar to Arjen sir, but less elegant.

Bhaskar Pandey - 3 years, 8 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...