S = k = 1 ∑ 2 0 1 6 x k x k + 1
Find the maximum of S if k = 1 ∑ 2 0 1 6 x k 2 = 2 0 1 6 and x 2 0 1 7 = x 1 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
same here(+1). this turns out to be easier than the original problem.
@Otto Bretscher , i dont remember "inspiring" any of you previous problems.
Log in to reply
It becomes harder if you omit the "link" x 2 0 1 6 x 1 . Try it!
I have now written a few problems on this topic @Aareyan Manzoor Enjoy!
A slight variant for those who dislike Cauchy-Schwarz (all sums run from 1 to 2016): 0 ≤ ∑ ( x k − x k + 1 ) 2 = ∑ x k 2 − 2 ∑ x k x k + 1 + ∑ x k + 1 2 = 2 ∑ x k 2 − 2 ∑ x k x k + 1 so ∑ x k x k + 1 ≤ ∑ x k 2 = 2 0 1 6
You still have to show that the this value is achievable.
Log in to reply
It seems self-evident from the inequality 0 ≤ ∑ ( x k − x k + 1 ) 2
;)
Log in to reply
It's not that self-evident.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – What about this one , Comrade Pi Han Goh?
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Must I use quadratic forms to get the answer too?
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Do it any way you can, Comrade... "Das Wesen der Mathematik liegt in ihrer Freiheit" (Cantor)
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – What I mean to ask is "What is the solution you had in mind?" Classical inequalities? Highly doubt it. Lagrange Multipliers? don't think so.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Classical inequalities are too weak for a problem like this , I believe (maybe somebody will prove me wrong). As you know, quadratic forms and Lagrange multipliers are equivalent in this case; either way you have to think about a matrix. This may require a bit of research: Find out what is known about the eigenvalues of a matrix "of this form". You can do it, Comrade!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Applying Cauchy Shwarz inequality, S = k = 1 ∑ 2 0 1 6 x k x k + 1 ≤ k = 1 ∑ 2 0 1 6 ( x k ) 2 k = 1 ∑ ( x k + 1 2 0 1 6 ) 2 = 2 0 1 6 2 = 2 0 1 6 ( S i n c e k = 1 ∑ 2 0 1 6 ( x k ) 2 = k = 1 ∑ 2 0 1 6 ( x k + 1 ) 2 = 2 0 1 6 ) Equality occurs when x 2 x 1 = x 3 x 2 = . . . . . = x 2 0 1 7 x 2 0 1 6 Or x 1 = x 2 = . . . . = x 2 0 1 6 = 1