x 8 − x 4 − 2 4 0 = 0
Consider all of the (possibly complex) roots to this equation. How many of them have a positive real part?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
It was trickly in part because y = x 4 = α > 0 will only yield 1 root with positive real part.
Where does all that knowledge come from?
Log in to reply
Toying around.
Of course, this requires an almost intimate knowledge of roots of unity and their applications.
Log in to reply
I'm slightly surprised at the low correct rate. What do you think tripped people up?
Log in to reply
Is 0 positive? I can see this being confusing for some people.
Log in to reply
@D G – No, 0 is not a positive number, rather it is a non - negative ( or non - positive ) number. The best way to think about it is to consider the set of integers { 1, 2, 3, 4, ... } . This set is the set of all positive Integers and is denoted by m a t h b h Z + . When we add 0 to this, we get the set of Non - Negative Integers ( though there is no standard notation to indicate the set of non - negative integers but still we can use the notation Z + ∪ { 0 } ). In a similar way, we can write the set of negative integers. Adding 0 to this set would yield the set of non - positive integers.
i thought I need to find real root and immediately answered 2. I think this could be a reason for such low rate
Log in to reply
@Aakash Khandelwal – Most of the wrong answers are 2, instead of 4 or 6.
Like me rephrase the question slightly.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – I initially just looked at 1 6 , which had one root with positive real component, then automatically assumed that was true for − 1 5 . But then I decided to look at it again, and found that − 1 5 had two roots with positive real components.
Log in to reply
@Daniel Liu – Can anybody explain me, whether 4th root of a negative number is positive or negative? Please look into given link and help me into this ! http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=x%5E8-x%5E4-240%3D0&dataset=
@Daniel Liu – How do you know if -15 have two positive real component ?
No idea. Maybe it's due to rash decision. Also, it might have been due the other question by Ayush which had the answer de g f / 2 .
How to determine all the complex roots??
( x 4 − 1 6 ) ( x 4 + 1 5 ) = 0 . This yields two groups of four solutions: x 4 = 1 6 ∴ x = ± 2 , ± 2 i , one of which has a positive real parts; and x 4 = − 1 5 ∴ x = 4 1 5 2 ± 1 ± i , two of which have positive real parts.
Therefore the answer is 3 .
I thought 0 is also a real part 😐
Log in to reply
It is-- but it isn't a positive real part, as the problem required.
Another way to deal with the x 4 = − 1 5 is to realize that the 4 roots consist of 2 sets of conjugate pairs, a ± b i and c ± d i . But by Vieta's theorem, the sum of the roots is 0. So a and c have the same numeric value but opposite signs. Therefore one conjugate pair has a positive real part and the other pair has a negative real part, yielding 2 roots in addition to the previous 1 root from x 4 = 1 6 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Notice that polynomial given is also a polynomial in x 4 . We shall let y = x 4 and we have y 2 − y − 2 4 0 = 0 .
We can easily see that the discriminant is positive; in conjunction with considering the constant term, we have one positive and one negative root exactly. We will call them α and β respectively.
Looking at the case y = x 4 = α > 0 , we have the possible solutions x forming a square with vertices on the real and imaginary axes. In similar fashion, we have the case x 4 = β < 0 with solutions forming a square with edges orthogonal to the axes.
As such, there are 3 solutions strictly to the right of the real axis.