⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 1 + x 2 + x 3 + ⋯ + x n = 2 n x 1 n + x 2 n + x 3 n + ⋯ + x n n = 2 2 0 1 6
Let x 1 , x 2 , … , x n be non-negative real numbers and n > 1 . Find the largest possible value of n such that the system of equations above holds true.
P/S: Please don't use calculators, this is completely solvable even without them!
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The solution is incomplete because you still need to find the "equality case". What you have is a necessary condition. However, it is not a sufficient condition. Even though you have double implication signs throughout (which I've not verified that they are all valid), you actually have a single implication sign going from the conditions of the question, to the first inequality that you wrote up.
See my comment in Aareyan's solution for a further explanation.
Log in to reply
Thanks Calvin! I'll try to find a equality case. By the way, is 1 enough? Or we need more?
Also, I can prove that a solution exists, but not the exact value. It's hard considering how large 2 2 0 1 6 is.
Log in to reply
So, instead of finding an explicit example, I would recommend using the intermediate value theorem to prove existence.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – I'm going to post the solution as soon as I finish the proof. Thanks.
By the way, can you help me check the equality case? Just found out a way to "distribute" 2 2 0 1 6 into 2 0 0 5 numbers but I'm not sure if I'm correct.
Log in to reply
@Steven Jim – That looks reasonable. We know that the equality case is going to have many numbers close to 2, so setting the first few = 2 makes the most sense.
To do IVT, we have x 2 0 0 4 = x , x 2 0 0 5 = 4 − x , with x ∈ [ 0 , 2 ] . We want to show that f ( x ) = x 2 0 0 5 + ( 4 − x ) 2 0 0 5 = 4 5 × 2 2 0 0 5 has a solution. This follows from IVT since f ( x ) is a continuous function and f ( 2 ) = 2 × 2 2 0 0 5 < 4 5 × 2 2 0 0 5 < 4 2 0 0 5 = f ( 0 ) .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Power Mean Inequality (QAGH)
As x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x n are positive reals, we can be sure that:
n n − 1 ( x 1 n + x 2 n + . . . + x n n ) ≥ ( x 1 + x 2 + . . . + x n ) n
< = > n n − 1 × 2 2 0 1 6 ≥ ( 2 n ) n
< = > 2 2 0 1 6 ≥ 2 n n = 2 n × 2 lo g 2 n = 2 n + lo g 2 n
< = > 2 0 1 6 ≥ n + lo g 2 n
It's easily seen that 1 0 2 4 < n < 2 0 4 8 , so 1 1 > lo g 2 n > 1 0
< = > n < 2 0 0 6
< = > max ( n ) = 2 0 0 5 ( n ∈ N )
Assume that x 1 = x 2 = . . . = x 2 0 0 3 = 2 and x 2 0 0 4 > x 2 0 0 5 , we have:
⎩ ⎨ ⎧ x 2 0 0 4 + x 2 0 0 5 = 4 x 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5 + x 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 5 = 2 2 0 0 5 ∗ 4 5
Let m , n be positive real numbers so that m = 2 ∗ x 2 0 0 4 , n = 2 ∗ x 2 0 0 5 , we have:
⎩ ⎨ ⎧ m + n = 2 m 2 0 0 5 + n 2 0 0 5 = 4 5
At this point, you can either use intermediate value theorem or use your calculator ( 4 5 is definitely small enough for most scientific calculators). If you use your calculator then you should find out (approximately) that m = 1 . 0 0 1 9 0 0 1 4 3 0 6 9 9 . . . , n = 0 . 9 9 8 0 9 9 8 5 6 9 3 0 1 . . . , which also means that x 2 0 0 4 = 2 . 0 0 3 8 0 0 2 8 6 1 3 9 8 . . . , x 2 0 0 5 = 1 . 9 9 6 1 9 9 7 1 3 8 6 0 2 . . . .
How to prove there exists a solution using IVT (Calvin): "We have x 2 0 0 4 = y , x 2 0 0 5 = 4 − y , with y ∈ [ 0 , 2 ] . We want to show that f ( y ) = y 2 0 0 5 + ( 4 − y ) 2 0 0 5 = 4 5 × 2 2 0 0 5 has a solution. This follows from IVT since f ( y ) is a continuous function and f ( 2 ) = 2 × 2 2 0 0 5 < 4 5 × 2 2 0 0 5 < 4 2 0 0 5 = f ( 0 ) "