True or false?
Because x → 0 lim x = x → 0 lim 0 , hence x → 0 lim sin ( x ) x = x → 0 lim sin ( x ) 0 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Thanks! I updated the question to get at the root of what I wanted to originally. IE "when can we substitute in the limit value".
Log in to reply
Do I need to edit my solution then?
Log in to reply
Yes please.
Focus on "Under what conditions can we substitute the limiting value into the expression?"
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Done! Let me know if this is what you wanted.
Log in to reply
@Prasun Biswas – Great! That's the condition to check!
Otherwise, we have a 0 0 indeterminate form that we will have to evaluate.
I've also updated your link to our wiki page. It's easy to do so! Check this out.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – That's a different quotient rule (the derivative one). I'm mentioning the one for limits.
EDIT: I have reverted it back to include the link to the quotient rule for limits.
Log in to reply
@Prasun Biswas – Oh yes you're right. It should actually be product of limits, with the proper conditions. Sorry!
I would like to point out that you can't compute the limit of type sin ( x ) / x for x approaching zero by l'Hospital's rule because you would use circular argument. Let me explain.
lim x → 0 x sin ( x ) is indeed type 0 / 0 limit so you can use the l'Hospital's rule, but if you apply it you get: lim x → 0 x ′ ( sin ( x ) ) ′ , where ( sin ( x ) ) ′ ∣ x = 0 = h → 0 lim h sin ( 0 + h ) − sin ( 0 ) = h → 0 lim h sin ( h )
So you're computing the limit assuming you already know the answer.
Log in to reply
Hm? You would get lim 1 cos x = lim cos x = 1 .
Log in to reply
Yes, but how do you know the derivative of sine? By computing this very limit.
Log in to reply
@V N – Oh, now I understand what you mean. I was confused with where you were going with it.
Yes, to avoid having a circular argument, we will need another way to derive either
1) The derivative of
sin
x
, or
2) The value of
lim
x
sin
x
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Exactly :)
@Calvin Lin – Well, I guess we still have Approach 1.
Log in to reply
@Prasun Biswas – Oh, my favorite approach for this fact is the squeeze (geometric) theorem, which shows that lim x sin x = 1 and lim x tan x = 1 .
0/k where k --> 0 but k > 0 will alway yield 0
x=0
sinx=sin0=0
(x/sinx)=(0/0)
so ,it is not right.....
By L'Hopital's rule, we can see that the LHS can be changed to l i m x → 0 c o s ( x ) 1 , which equals 1. On the other hand, the limit on the RHS is a constant 0. And there you have it!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
According to the quotient rule in limits (see here ) , we have,
x → a lim g ( x ) f ( x ) = x → a lim g ( x ) x → a lim f ( x ) if x → a lim g ( x ) = 0
In the problem here, it shows an incorrect use of this rule with a = 0 and g ( x ) = sin x and f ( x ) = x in LHS and f ( x ) = 0 in RHS. Why is it an incorrect use? Since x → 0 lim sin x = 0 which violates the "if" condition of the rule stated above.
Hence, we cannot just shove the limit value like that.
Now, it's easy to show that both the limits exist and are finite, so I'm heading straight to evaluating them.
First, let's evaluate the limit on the left side of the equation.
Approach 1:
Recall the Maclaurin series of sin x . We have,
sin x = k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( − 1 ) k ( 2 k + 1 ) ! x 2 k + 1
Hence, we have, when x → 0 ,
sin x = x − 3 ! x 3 + O ( x 5 ) ⟹ x sin x = 1 − 3 ! x 2 + O ( x 4 ) = 1 ⟹ x → 0 lim x sin x = 1 ⟹ x → 0 lim sin x x = x → 0 lim x sin x 1 = 1 1 = 1
Approach 2:
This limit can also be proved to be 1 using L'Hopital rule as follows:
x → 0 lim sin x x = x → 0 lim cos x 1 = cos 0 1 = 1 1 = 1
Now, moving onto the second limit, it's relatively simple. We have,
x → 0 lim sin x 0 = x → 0 lim 0 = 0
Note that when x → 0 , we have sin x = 0 so there is no indeterminate case.
Now, since we found out both the limits, we can see that the question states 1 = 0 which is obviously false. Hence the answer. □
Note: O ( ⋅ ) denotes Big-O Notation.