d x 2 d 2 y = − k y
For which real numbers k does there exist a non-zero real-valued function y = f ( x ) such that the differential equation above holds?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
From the theory of ODE, we know that local solutions exist. As such, the more interesting question is whether or not global solutions exist.
Hi Otto,how is it going?sorry, I just only wanted to comment that there is a wiki about this type of equations for interested people. It's only a copy of the re-copy of the re-copy of Differential equations with constant coefficients . Thanks anyway, see you soon.
Log in to reply
Yes, this looks like a great resource.. clearly explained! Thank you, Guillermo!
Maybe you could mention Euler's Theorem in the context of non-real roots (Theorem 3)
Log in to reply
Yes, I'm going to try to explain it ..., Due to we are treating with characteristic equations where the coefficients are real, if this equation has a complex root a + bi then a - bi is other root of the characteristic equation, and this leads us to e ( a ± b i ) x = e a x ⋅ e ± i b x = e a x ⋅ ( cos b x ± i sin b x ) will be two independent solutions of the original differential equation. Also, due to a linear homogeneus differential equation of order n where the coefficients of the equation are real continuous functions has a general solution regarding of n linearly independent functions, we add constants(not necessaryly real) in front of these n linearly independent functions for generating one general solution... It's difficult for me to explain math with words... I don't know if my explanation helps you... Ask me more if you wish it.
Log in to reply
@Guillermo Templado – Yes, great explanation!
Thanks for the shout-out! This problem brings up the interesting point for my problem that wavefunctions in quantum mechanics are expected to be bounded, even if they are not normalizable (c.f. plane wave eigenstates).
Applying the Laplace Transform, one gets:
s 2 ⋅ Y ( s ) − s ⋅ y ( 0 ) − y ˙ ( 0 ) = − k ⋅ Y ( s )
Y ( s ) = s 2 + k s ⋅ y ( 0 ) + y ˙ ( 0 )
Y ( s ) = 2 1 ⋅ ( y ( 0 ) + k y ˙ ( 0 ) ) ⋅ s + k 1 + 2 1 ⋅ ( y ( 0 ) − k y ˙ ( 0 ) ) ⋅ s − k 1
Which leads to:
y ( t ) = 2 1 ⋅ ( y ( 0 ) + k y ˙ ( 0 ) ) ⋅ e − k t + 2 1 ⋅ ( y ( 0 ) − k y ˙ ( 0 ) ) ⋅ e k t
Which, in theory, only leads to positive values of k in order to y(t) be real.
However, if we choose y ( 0 ) = y ˙ ( 0 ) = 0 , we will get Y ( s ) = 0 and, so, y ( t ) = 0 , which is also real, regardless of k
I'm looking for non-zero solutions y , of course; that was a flaw in the wording of my problem that I have now corrected.
Are there non-zero solutions y for all real k ?
Log in to reply
Sorry. Completing: If k < 0 and y ( 0 ) = 1 and y ˙ ( 0 ) = ± − k :
Y ( s ) = ( s + − k ) ⋅ ( s − − k ) s ± − k = s ± − k 1
Which leads to:
y ( t ) = e ± − k t
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
For any real k , we have the non-zero complex-valued solution y = e − k x . For k ≤ 0 , this function is real-values and we are done. For k > 0 , we can use Euler's Theorem and observe that the real and imaginary parts of y = e − k x = e i k x = cos ( k x ) + i sin ( k x ) will be non-zero solutions.