As x ranges over all real values, what is the minimum of
x 2 + ( x + 1 ) 2 ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
How do you know that it's a minimum value rather than a maximum value?
reply to challenge masternote.....because the coefficient of x2 is positive,,,,indicating a smiling face graph..therefore you know it is minimum....
Log in to reply
the smiling face graph part killed me ^^
Log in to reply
I thought "smiling" was common terminology.
Log in to reply
@Jake Lai – well, it is more that it is not very accurate or well-defined! turning the graph upside down still makes the function convex, but it is now 'sad'! (no troll intended) . Also, there are lots of functions which are convex but hardly look like any nice smiling smiley!!
Log in to reply
@Patrick Bourg – turning it down its x2 coefficient would be negative....its the simplest way and most accurate way to describe the shape of graph...lol
isn't it the formula for finding the minimum value is (4ac - b^2 )/4a?
Log in to reply
there are alot of ways....but i never heard this...and by looking at the coeeficient would be way faster..
Log in to reply
but if you are just looking for the coefficient, you are just identifying if it is minimum or maximum, you must use the above formula to get the value of minimum or maximum..
Log in to reply
@Ojna Eugitaraba – just differentiate and let dy/dx=0 and sub back to equation or simply completing the square....as i mentioned...there are a lot of ways to get things done.....i don't memorize formula..so....my twocents
That formula is derived from the above method. When you find the x-coordinate of the vertex with -b/2a and plug it into the original quadratic, you get that formula.
I also did the same :)
A good rule of thumb is that when the degree of your polynomial is even and the coefficient of the dominant variable (the variable with the greatest power) is positive that means it will provide the largest contribution to function. This means that since as you greater and greater values of x then the function will naturally tend toward being arbitrary large (this goes both ways as very large negative numbers will be large positive numbers since squaring a negative makes positive). This means that naturally there is a a minimum, mind you it does not tell you how many minimums there are in the function, just that there has to be one.
the parabola is opened upwards as coeffecient of a is positive so it will only have a mimima and its global maxima is infinte
x 2 + ( x + 1 ) 2 = 2 x 2 + 2 x + 1 = 2 ( x + 2 1 ) 2 + 2 1 The minimum value is achieved when the term which is squared is 0 . Hence the minimum value is 2 1 .
Let f be the function such that f ( x ) = x 2 + ( x + 1 ) 2 . Then the first derivative is
f ′ ( x ) = 4 x + 2
But f ′ ( x ) = 0 gives is an extreme point at x = − 1 / 2 . The second derivative is
f ′ ′ ( x ) = 4 > 0
But f ′ ′ ( x ) > 0 means that the point we chose is a minimum. Then the minimum value of the function f happens at x = − 1 / 2 and
f ( − 1 / 2 ) = 2 1
Yes, this is the calculus approach to this problem. But why is this statement true?
But f ′ ′ ( x ) > 0 means that the point we chose is a minimum.
Since this is just an algebra problem, can you solve this without resorting to calculus?
The simplest way to solve this without relying on calculus is to use the method of completing the square. If we consider the given expression as f ( x ) , then we have,
f ( x ) = x 2 + ( x + 1 ) 2 = 2 x 2 + 2 x + 1 = 2 [ x 2 + x + 2 1 ] = 2 [ ( x + 2 1 ) 2 + 2 1 − 2 2 1 ] = 2 [ ( x + 2 1 ) 2 + 4 1 ]
Now, we have, by the trivial inequality that,
∀ x ∈ R , ( x + 2 1 ) 2 ≥ 0 ⟺ f ( x ) ≥ 2 ⋅ 4 1 = 2 1
with equality iff x + 2 1 = 0 , i.e., iff x = − 2 1 .
In response to the first part of the Challenge Master note, since f ′ ′ ( x ) > 0 at the stationary point x = − 1 / 2 , f ( − 2 1 ) = 2 1 is a minimum of the function by the Second Derivative Test .
One can also graphically discern this, since f ′ ′ ( x ) > 0 means the function is concave up . This, in conjunction with the fact that there is a stationary point at x = 2 1 allows for a visualization of the minimum at f ( − 2 1 ) = 2 1 .
The same result can be obtained using the First Derivative Test as well.
f ( x ) = y = x 2 + ( x + 1 ) 2 = 2 x 2 + 2 x + 1
d x d y = 4 x + 2
You obtain your max. or min. points if there are any at d x d y = 0
Then, 4 x + 2 = 0 , x = − 2 1
Now substitute by x value in f ( x )
You get y = 2 1
Note: this a minimum value because f ′ ′ ( x ) > 0 (a positive number)
Substitute y = x + 2 1 to get ( y − 2 1 ) 2 + ( y + 2 1 ) 2 = 2 y 2 + 2 1
But by the Trivial inequality, 2 y 2 + 2 1 ≥ 2 1 so we are done.
The minimum is achieved when x 2 = ( x + 1 ) 2 - this is the equality case for AM-GM. (It can also be proven that the minimum is achieved using a multitude of other ways, including possibly Cauchy-Schwarz and even geometrically.)
Since x = x + 1 , it must be that − x = x + 1 , ie x = − 2 1 .
f(x) = x^2+ x^2+2x+1 = 2x^2+2x+1
Since coefficient of x^2 is positive, f(x) has a minimum turning point.
Turning point is at x= -2/2(2) = -1/2
So minimum is f(-1/2)
f(-1/2) = 1/2
So minimum value is 1/2
x 2 + ( x + 1 ) 2
y = 2 x 2 + 2 x + 1
y = 2 ( x + 2 1 ) 2 + 2 1
Hence, 2 1 .
Sqrt(x^2+(x+1)^2) is the distance between (x,x) which is a point on line y=x and (0,-1). By graph the shortest distance is half the unit square's diagnol or 1/sqrt(2). Thus tye answer is 1/2
The function is 2 x 2 + 2 x + 1 and its minimum is − 4 a D = 2 1 .
How do you know that it's a minimum value rather than a maximum value? And do you have proof that it must occur at − 4 a D ?
Can you tell what is D ???
Log in to reply
Discriminent
Discriminant.
Determinent
Log in to reply
I think Discriminant is a better name
Log in to reply
@Rama Devi – I am not wrong! It is called discriminant because it discriminates or decides whether the roots are real or not. I spelled it right.
In response to challenge master : a is positive. That means that it's a parabola opening upwards.
Log in to reply
In response to challenge master : Going by the trend shown by your notes in my solution, I bet that you're eventually going to end up asking: "How is 1+1 = 2?"
Log in to reply
Yet the simple things are difficult to solve. That's why you start out with axioms that make a sort of rough foundation for your domain.
And when you don't follow a certain axiom (Euclid's fifth for example), you may end up with a whole new foundation for your domain. Or you may end up in a mental health institution :)
Nice conclusion, brah.
To find a minimum or a maximum, we need the first derivative of the function, which is 4 x + 2 , we set equal to 0 and solve for x ; that is, 2 x + 2 ( x + 1 ) = 0 , we obtain x = ( 2 − 1 ), then f ( − 1 / 2 ) = 1 / 2
x^2+(x+1)^2=2x^2+2x+1
a[x+b/(2a)]^2+(4ac-b^2)/4a
minimum y-value=(4ac-b^2)/4a
which is [4(2)(1)-4]/8=1/2
Obvoiusly: the function which quadratic function, let f(x)=2x^2 +2x +1, f will be minimum when x = -1/2. Hence, f_min= 1/2
Use calculus: take derivative of function; then set derivative equal to zero; finally, solve for x.
Easy solution. 2X^2 + 2X +1 = 2X^2 + 2 (squar root of 2)X 1/(square root of 2) + 1/2 + 1/2 = ((square root of 2)X + 1/(square root of 2))^2 + 1/2 >= 1/2
For symmetry reasons, it's gotta be in the middle between − 1 and 0 , and so we have ( − 2 1 ) 2 + ( 2 1 ) 2 = 2 1
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
f ( x ) = x 2 + ( x + 1 ) 2 = 2 x 2 + 2 x + 1 and its vertex is − 2 a b = − 2 1 . Therefore, the minimum is f ( − 2 1 ) ,
⟹ 2 1 .