Inspired by Rubik's cube

Logic Level 3

While solving a 3 × 3 3 \times 3 Rubik's cube , Trevor has only n n 2 -colored 2 \text{-colored} (edge) cubies in the wrong position. All other cubies are correctly oriented and positioned. What is the minimum possible value of n n ?

Inspiration .
4 6 3 Such a situation is impossible. 2

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Ashwin Upadhyay
Sep 6, 2015

I am talking about this situation. Only these 2 pieces are reversed.

Please like and reshare the problem.

You'll have to prove that this is achievable and this is the minimum.

Agnishom Chattopadhyay - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

I have achieved this situation in the online cube game. I think this picture is enough for the proof & if anyone has any doubt, he can check it on online cube solver.

And, obviously n=2 is minimum as the whole cube solved with only one piece reversed is not possible.

I think you are a speedcuber?? You can try to achieve this position yourself.

Ashwin Upadhyay - 5 years, 9 months ago

R E R2 E2 R U R' E2 R2 E' R' U' If you know the notations there is an algorithm for it

Toni Sinervö - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

what does 'E' stand for??

Ashwin Upadhyay - 5 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

@Ashwin Upadhyay Equatorial slice moves. or slice moves along the y axis in the same direction as you would move D

Toni Sinervö - 5 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...