A B C D is a tetrahedron where all three face angles at vertex A are right angles and the side lengths A B = b , A C = c , A D = d are all distinct, positive integers.
What is the smallest possible integer value for the area of △ B C D ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The smallest value is A = 9 . It holds for { b , c , d } = { 1 , 2 , 8 } .
Log in to reply
I was getting there...
Why isn't the smallest solution {b, c, d} = {2, 2, 4} for an area of A = 6?
Log in to reply
It is specified that b , c , d are distinct integers.
You can get to the solution a = 2 b 2 d 2 + b 2 c 2 + c 2 d 2 algebraically as well (I will use E as the point colinear to B D and leaving C E ⊥ B D ). This can be done through solving B E 2 + C E 2 = B C 2 and E D 2 + C E 2 = C D 2 for B E and then plugging that into the first equation to solve for C E (The first step is needed because while we can write C B , B D , and C D in terms of b , c , and d , we can't do the same for B E or E D . If we use B E + E D = B D , substitute this into one of our two equations, and then solve for the remaining ' E ' line, we can find the value of C E in terms of b , c , and d ). This value can then be plugged into A = 2 b h , where C E is the height and B D is the base of the triangle. This method can be used if the solver (like me) doesn’t know what the crossproduct of vectors are.
Log in to reply
A cross product is linear algebra...
Briefly, the cross product is a vector whose direction is perpendicular to the two given vectors, and whose magnitude (absolute value, norm) equals the area of the parallelogram they define.
In terms of coordinates, it is defined as ( a x , a y , a z ) × ( b x , b y , b z ) = ( a y b z − a z b y , a z b x − a x b z , a x b y − a y b x ) ; or, using determinants, a × b = ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ a x b x e x a y b y e y a z b z e z ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ .
Log in to reply
We don’t care about he direction of the cross product in this application, correct? We only care about the magnitude?
Log in to reply
@Calvin Osborne – Correct. That's why I immediately applied the Pythagorean theorem to the vector product components, as follows:
Two of the vectors defining the sides of the squares are u = ( b , − c , 0 ) and v = ( b , 0 , − d ) .
The cross product is the vector u × v = ( c d , d b , b c ) .
The norm of this product is ∣ u × v ∣ = ( c d ) 2 + ( d b ) 2 + ( b c ) 2 .
This is the area of a parallelogram; the triangle is half of this.
Log in to reply
@Arjen Vreugdenhil – Oh I see, thanks for the explanation!
Also known as De Gua's theorem
Log in to reply
Huh, I didn’t even realize that this had a name. Cool!
Another (faster?) algebraic path is checking that the height h a of Δ A B D is equal to b 2 + d 2 b d . Then you can solve for the height h c = c 2 + h a 2 = c 2 + b 2 + d 2 b 2 d 2 of Δ B C D so that the area becomes 2 1 ⋅ c 2 + b 2 + d 2 b 2 d 2 ⋅ b 2 + d 2 = 2 1 ⋅ ( b c ) 2 + ( c d ) 2 + ( b d ) 2
I can't understand the question...
This might sound silly if I've missed something, but isn't the area equal to 2 1 b 4 + ( b c ) 2 + ( b d ) 2 + ( c d ) 2 ? (using BC and BD as you did)
Denote B C = b 2 + c 2 , B D = b 2 + d 2 , C D = c 2 + d 2 , s = 2 B C + B D + C D , and apply Heron's formula P Δ B D C = s ( s − B C ) ( s − B D ) ( s − C D ) = 2 1 b 2 c 2 + b 2 d 2 + c 2 d 2 , and we find the minimal integer value of 2 1 b 2 c 2 + b 2 d 2 + c 2 d 2 in distinct integers b , c , d . Since these number are to be positive, and we are seeking the minimum of that expression, we set the least value, for instance, for d , i.e. d = 1 . Since these numbers are distinct, we choose the least value, for instance, for c , i.e. c = 2 . Thus, the expression is reduced to 2 1 5 b 2 + 4 = 5 ( 2 b ) 2 + 1 , and that means b must be even. Denote b = 2 k , and we are looking for the first perfect square 5 k 2 + 1 . The immediate check gives rise to k = 4 , meaning that 9 is the minimal value, reached for d = 1 , c = 2 , b = 8 .
there is a mistake, it should be 5k²+4
Log in to reply
You probably mean 5 b 2 + 4 , instead of 5 b 2 + 1 ?! Yes, you are right, I have corrected. It was just a typing mistake, and it doesn't change anything, but thanks anyway!
Not sure you rule out this way that the found area is smaller than for instance the one obtained for 2, 3, 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 |
|
What’s this??
Coding baby
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The smallest solution is { b , c , d } = { 1 , 2 , 8 } , with an area of A = 9 .
The area may be expressed as half of a cross product of vectors: A = 2 1 ∣ B C × B D ∣ = 2 1 ( b c ) 2 + ( b d ) 2 + ( c d ) 2 . In order for ( b c ) 2 + ( b d ) 2 + ( c d ) 2 to be a perfect square, they cannot all be odd. If they are all even, we can divide everything by two to find a smaller solution. (This may cause A to be a half-integer, but we'll worry about that later.) We stipulate that c > d have the same parity (both odd or both even). b is the "odd duck" with the opposite parity.
Let a = 2 A . We rework the equation as ( b 2 + c 2 ) ( b 2 + d 2 ) = a 2 + ( b 2 ) 2 . Note that with our choices of b , c , d , the factors on the left are necessarily odd; a has the same parity as c and d .
This brings us to the theory of (odd) sums of squares. If a sum of squares is a prime number, it is of the form p = 4 k + 1 ; conversely, any such prime may be written as a unique sums of squares. The product of sums of squares may always be written as a sum of squares. If a sum of squares is a compound number, there is more than one way to write it as a sum of squares. (The exception is a number of the form p 2 . If p = x 2 + y 2 then p 2 = ( x 2 − y 2 ) 2 + ( 2 x y ) 2 is the only way to write p as sum of squares.)
To save ourselves even more work, consider that if b 2 + c 2 and b 2 + d 2 are prime , the only ways to write the product as a sum of squares are ( b 2 + c 2 ) ( b 2 + d 2 ) = ( b ( c ± d ) ) 2 + ( b 2 ∓ c d ) 2 . Comparing this to our earlier equation ( b 2 + c 2 ) ( b 2 + d 2 ) = a 2 + ( b 2 ) 2 , we conclude that b ( c ± d ) = b 2 ; b 2 ∓ c d = a . Thus we have b = c ± d , requiring b to be even and c , d to be odd. Also, a = c 2 + d 2 ± c d . The only glitch is that this makes a odd, and therefore A = a / 2 fractional. We resolve this by doubling b , c , d (and thus quadrupling the area A ). The area will always be even in this case.
Odd prime numbers of the form 4 k + 1 are as follows: 5 1 3 2 9 5 3 1 7 4 1 9 7 3 7 6 1 7 3 8 9 2 2 + 1 2 2 2 + 3 2 2 2 + 5 2 2 2 + 7 2 4 2 + 1 2 4 2 + 5 2 4 2 + 9 2 6 2 + 1 2 6 2 + 5 2 8 2 + 3 2 8 2 + 5 2 ⋮
Thus we follow this recipe: choose an even value b . In the table, find two corresponding odd values c , d whose sum or difference is equal to b . Select two squares b 2 + c 2 = b 2 + d 2 from the list. Calculate a .
b 2 2 2 4 4 6 8 c , d 1 , 3 3 , 5 5 , 7 1 , 5 5 , 9 1 , 5 3 , 5 b 2 + d 2 , b 2 + c 2 5 , 1 3 1 3 , 2 9 2 9 , 5 3 1 7 , 4 1 4 1 , 9 7 3 7 , 6 1 7 3 , 8 9 a 7 1 9 3 9 2 1 6 1 3 1 4 9
Recall that for a solution to the problem, we must double a , b , c , d . Thus the smallest solution of this kind is { b , c , d } = { 2 , 4 , 6 } with A = 1 4 .
However, it is also possible that if b 2 + c 2 and/or b 2 + d 2 is not prime . In that case, they will be a composite number, the product of two or more (odd) sums of squares. These composite numbers may be expressed as sums of squares in differrent ways. For instance,
6 5 = 5 ⋅ 1 3 8 5 = 5 ⋅ 1 7 1 2 5 = 5 ⋅ 5 2 1 4 5 = 5 ⋅ 2 9 1 8 5 = 5 ⋅ 3 7 2 0 5 = 5 ⋅ 4 1 2 2 1 = 1 3 ⋅ 1 7 8 2 + 1 2 2 2 + 9 2 2 2 + 1 1 2 1 2 2 + 1 2 4 2 + 1 3 2 1 4 2 + 3 2 1 4 2 + 5 2 4 2 + 7 2 6 2 + 7 2 1 0 2 + 5 2 8 2 + 9 2 8 2 + 1 1 2 6 2 + 1 3 2 1 0 2 + 1 1 2 ⋮
The smallest value of ( b 2 + c 2 ) ( b 2 + d 2 ) we can produce in this manner is 5 ⋅ 6 5 = ( 1 2 + 2 2 ) ( 1 2 + 8 2 ) = ( 1 2 + 2 2 ) ( 7 2 + 4 2 ) = ( 1 ⋅ 7 ± 2 ⋅ 4 ) 2 + ( 1 ⋅ 4 ∓ 2 ⋅ 7 ) 2 = { 1 5 2 + 1 0 2 1 2 + 1 8 2 Here we have b = 1 , so we look for an expression of the form a 2 + ( b 2 ) 2 = a 2 + 1 2 . Clearly, this happens for a = 1 8 , so that ( 1 2 + 2 2 ) ( 1 2 + 8 2 ) = 1 8 2 + ( 1 2 ) 2 , { b , c , d } = { 1 , 2 , 8 } , A = 9 . This is an improvement over the earlier solution A = 1 4 (only because the fractional value A = 3 2 1 was not allowed). It is clear that choosing greater factors will lead to greater values of b , c , d and therefore greater areas. For instance, another relatively small solution is 1 3 ⋅ 8 5 = ( 2 2 + 3 2 ) ( 2 2 + 9 2 ) = ( 2 2 + 3 2 ) ( 6 2 + 7 2 ) = 3 3 2 + ( 2 2 ) 2 ; doubled to { b , c , d } = { 4 , 6 , 1 8 } , A = 6 6 .