Evaluate the following integral
∫ 0 1 1 + x 2 ln 2 ( x ) d x
The result is in the form 2 n π m
State your answer as m ⋅ n
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
@Brian Moehring Or, Sir, we could use the approach of expanding the denominator as an infinite G.P. and then evaluate the answer as 2 times Beta(3)....!!!
Log in to reply
While I have no doubt there is another method, I don't follow what you mean by your answer. The beta function has two inputs, so I don't know what you mean by Beta(3) (I thought you might mean the central beta function, but then 2 × β ( 3 ) = 1 5 1 , so that can't be it)
Log in to reply
Ummm no no Sir,........I was referring to the Dirichlet Beta Function!!
Log in to reply
@Aaghaz Mahajan – Ahhh, yeah, that would do it. It's a little unsatisfying to me, though, just because I've never dealt with the Dirichlet Beta before (or really any L-function other than the standard Riemann Zeta).
Do you know of any way of evaluating β ( 3 ) from first principles?
Log in to reply
@Brian Moehring – No worries......For instance, I have not even started Complex Analysis as of now........I am just doing Vector Calculus right now!! So, could you please suggest me any good book for starting learning Complex Analysis??? I have a PDF of "Visual Complex Analysis".....
And as for the proof, well Sir, I have encountered the exact same question sometime earlier too.....But I have been trying hard but couldn't......But I have a nice paper which you can check out for the proof......
Log in to reply
@Aaghaz Mahajan – The books I used were Stein/Shakarchi's Complex Analysis and Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis . That said, I was already a grad student before I took any classes in complex analysis, so while I believe they are generally well-written, I'm not sure I would have fully understood either if I had neither the experience from other classes nor the good professors to explain the concepts.
As for the paper in the link, it's too late in the night for my mind to make sense of ~15-16 pages, but thanks for sharing it. I will try to skim the ideas tomorrow.
Log in to reply
@Brian Moehring – Ok Sir!!! Thanks!!!! I'll try my best to grasp those books!!!!! And as for the professors....I have to wait for two years......I am still in Class 11th in school :) !!! But thanks again, Sir...!!!
@Brian Moehring
–
Here is the link.........
http://vixra.org/pdf/1607.0569v1.pdf
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Here's the idea:
Put it all together: ∫ 0 1 1 + x 2 ln 2 ( x ) d x = 4 1 ∫ − ∞ ∞ cosh u u 2 d u = − 1 6 π 3 + 8 π 2 ( π ) = 1 6 π 3 so that m = 3 , n = 4 ⟹ m ⋅ n = 1 2