If I n = ∫ 0 1 x ( ln x ) n d x , then of which of the following is/are true?
Choose the most precise option.
(A):
I
n
has a finite value for all positive integers
n
.
(B):
I
1
I
2
+
I
2
I
3
+
I
3
I
4
=
−
4
.
(C):
I
4
=
−
9
.
(D):
I
8
=
4
0
3
3
1
.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
It would have been better if we would have applied Gamma in the second step by taking 2 − u = z
@Indraneel Mukhopadhyaya
the relation i get between I(n) and I(n-1) is that their ratio is -2n . but i am not able to comment on option D and C
I think that's rather incorrect.One can clearly transform the integral to the form of I = 2 n ∗ 2 ∗ ∫ ( l n t ) n d t .This follows on substituting √ x = t .This eliminates C , D as I ( n ) must be even atleast(even if negative).Now I ( n ) would be defined that's for sure since for every evaluation of I ( n ) there would be a term t f ( l n t ) .And the lower limit vanishes the term.And to mention one could just calc I ( 1 ) = − 4 , I ( 2 ) = 1 6 , I ( 3 ) = − 9 6 This implying the ratio of I ( n ) / I ( n − 1 ) gets bigger and bigger.And thus B is incorrect.What lead you to the deduction I ( n ) / I ( n − 1 ) = 2 n .That's wrong for sure.
Log in to reply
i wrote (x)^-(1/2) as -2d(x^(1/2)) and applied udv
Here I(n+1)/I(n)= -2(n+1) By applying integration by parts
Log in to reply
the same relation i got .put n as n-1 and ull see
Log in to reply
@Avi Solanki – I wanted to upload solution for the question (3D and limits).. Can u tell me how to upload images..
Log in to reply
@Devansh Jain – go to type a solution. u must be on a laptop to upload the image . ull find an the options as latex ,add link etc in the toolbar . the third option is the one to attatch an image . save the image to ur desktop in jpg format and attatch it .
Log in to reply
@Avi Solanki – if ur not able to do so .i can share my email adress .i can post the solution on your behalf .
Log in to reply
@Avi Solanki – Actually I don't have a laptop so I am sharing the link to my images...There are 2 images Link:1 https://postimg.org/image/r3pqznlk1/ Link:2 https://postimg.org/image/tmk629ntl/
Log in to reply
@Devansh Jain – ok i will post the solution on your behalf , thanks :)
@Devansh Jain – i have posted it
When you say I(n) must be even, you must first prove that it is an integer.It is not beforehand obvious that I(n) is an integer (although it eventually turns out to be an integer).Secondly, the ratio of I(n) and I(n-1) is indeed (-2n).And the value of I(2) is not 8, it is 16 (check your calculations)
Log in to reply
Kindly check I mentioned that its not 2 n .not − 2 n .And if I ( 1 ) is an integer one could easily build up an intuition that I ( n ) is gonna be an integer too.And for that I have edited 1 6 .Thanks.
My calculations gave me the ratio -2n.Once you get the ratio, observe that if you recursively multiply the ratio for n=2,3,... , it forms a telescopic product .Hence we get the closed form of the integral = 2 n + 1 ( − 1 ) n n ! .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I ( n ) = ∫ 0 1 x ln ( x ) n d x
ln ( x ) = u → d x = x ⋅ d u = e u ⋅ d u
I ( n ) = ∫ − ∞ 0 u n ⋅ e 2 u d u
Integrating by parts:
I ( n ) = 2 ⋅ u n ⋅ e 2 u ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ − ∞ 0 − 2 ⋅ ∫ − ∞ 0 n u n − 1 ⋅ e 2 u d u
I ( n ) = − 2 ⋅ ∫ − ∞ 0 n u n − 1 ⋅ e 2 u d u
Repeat it n − 1 more times, totalizing n times and you'll get:
I ( n ) = ( − 1 ) n ⋅ n ! ⋅ 2 n ∫ − ∞ 0 e 2 u d u
I ( n ) = ( − 1 ) n ⋅ n ! ⋅ 2 n + 1
So, both ( C ) and ( D ) are false. Also:
I ( n − 1 ) I ( n ) = − 2 n
So, ( B ) is also false. The only option which is true is ( A )