Let I n = ∫ − ∞ ∞ ( 1 + x 2 ) 2 cos ( n x ) d x . If n = 0 ∑ ∞ I n = A , find ⌊ 1 0 0 A ⌋ .
Notation : ⌊ ⋅ ⌋ denotes the floor function .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
How did you write − ∫ 0 ∞ x 2 + b x sin ( a x ) d x = − ∫ 0 ∞ x sin ( a x ) d x + b ∫ 0 ∞ x 2 + b sin ( a x ) d x ?
Log in to reply
Multiply above and below by x and then add and substract b. ∫ 0 ∞ ( x 2 + b ) x sin ( a x ) d x = ∫ 0 ∞ x ( x 2 + b ) x 2 sin ( a x ) d x = ∫ 0 ∞ x ( x 2 + b ) ( x 2 + b − b ) sin ( a x ) d x = ∫ 0 ∞ ( x sin ( a x ) − x 2 + b b sin ( a x ) ) d x
Log in to reply
But you can't split improper integrals like that!
Log in to reply
@Vilakshan Gupta – I have already given the explanation in the note as they are uniformly convergent. You can prove it using M-Test. A convergent integral can be split into two integrals provided both of them converge separately.Since the improper integral of both sin(ax)/x and x 2 + b sin ( a x ) is convergent so we can split it into two parts. In general any limit of (f(x)+g(x)) can be written as limit of f(x) + limit of g(x) provided both f(x) and g(x) converge separately. watch this :-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WP8JMVGuOD8
We can solve I n = ∫ − ∞ ∞ ( 1 + x 2 ) 2 e i n x d x = ℜ ( ∫ − ∞ ∞ ( 1 + x 2 ) 2 cos ( n x ) d x ) using contour integration with a semicircle of radius R → ∞ in the upper complex plain.
∮ ( 1 + z 2 ) 2 e i n z d z = ∫ − ∞ ∞ ( 1 + x 2 ) 2 e i n x d x + ∫ arc ( 1 + z 2 ) 2 e i n z d z
By Jordan's lemma, the last integral in the RHS above approaches 0 as R → ∞ . Then
∫ − ∞ ∞ ( 1 + x 2 ) 2 e i n x d x = ∮ ( 1 + z 2 ) 2 e i n z d z = ∮ ( ( z − i ) ( z + i ) ) 2 e i n z d z = 2 π i ⋅ d z d [ ( z + i ) 2 e i n z ] z = i = 2 π i [ ( z + i ) 3 e i z ( i n z − n − 2 ) ] z = i = 2 π e − n ( n + 1 ) Only 1 pole z = i is within the contour. By Cauchy integral formula
I n = ℜ ( ∫ − ∞ ∞ ( 1 + x 2 ) 2 e i n x d x ) = 2 π e − n ( n + 1 ) .
Then
A = n = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 π e − n ( n + 1 ) = 2 π n = 1 ∑ ∞ d x d x n ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ x = e − 1 = 2 π ⋅ d x d n = 1 ∑ ∞ x n ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ x = e − 1 = 2 π ⋅ d x d [ 1 − x x ] x = e − 1 = 2 ( e − 1 ) 2 π e 2 ≈ 3 . 9 3 1
Therefore ⌊ 1 0 0 A ⌋ = 3 9 3 .
Reference: Cauchy integral formula
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let I ( a , b ) = ∫ 0 ∞ x ( x 2 + b ) sin ( a x ) d x
So we have :-
∂ a ∂ I = ∫ 0 ∞ x 2 + b cos ( a x ) d x
∂ a 2 ∂ 2 I = − ∫ 0 ∞ x 2 + b x sin ( a x ) d x = − ∫ 0 ∞ x sin ( a x ) d x + b ∫ 0 ∞ x ( x 2 + b ) sin ( a x ) d x = − 2 π + b I ( a , b )
Here I used the fact that ∫ 0 ∞ x sin ( a x ) = 2 π
So we have ( D 2 − b ) I = 2 − π Here D ≡ ∂ a ∂ and D 2 ≡ ∂ a 2 ∂ 2
Solving this ODE in a we get
I ( a , b ) = C 1 e a b + C 2 e − a b + 2 b π We have I ( 0 , b ) = 0
So C 1 + C 2 + 2 b π = 0
Also ∂ a ∂ I = b ( C 1 e a b − C 2 e − a b )
Also ∂ a ∂ I at ( 0 , b ) = ∫ 0 ∞ x 2 + b d x = 2 b π .
So we get C 1 = 0 and C 2 = 2 b − π
So I ( a , b ) = 2 b − π e − a b + 2 b π
∂ a ∂ I = 2 b π e − a b
∂ b ∂ a ∂ 2 I = 4 − π ( b a e − a b + b b e − a b )
From the Definition of I ( a , b ) we have
∂ b ∂ a ∂ 2 I = ∫ 0 ∞ ( x 2 + b ) 2 − cos ( a x ) d x
We know ∫ − ∞ ∞ ( x 2 + 1 ) 2 cos ( n x ) d x = 2 ∫ 0 ∞ ( x 2 + 1 ) 2 cos ( n x ) d x
So what we need is − 2 ∂ b ∂ a ∂ 2 I at the point ( n , 1 ) .
So Using the expression above we have I n = 2 π ( n + 1 ) e − n .
We know 1 − x 1 = n = 0 ∑ ∞ x n for − 1 < x < 1
Hence 1 − x x = n = 0 ∑ ∞ x n + 1
Differentiating term by term once on both sides (possible due to uniform convergence)
We have ( 1 − x ) 2 1 = n = 0 ∑ ∞ ( n + 1 ) x n
Using the above we have n = 0 ∑ ∞ I n = A = 2 π ⋅ ( e − 1 ) 2 e 2 = 3 . 9 3 1 1 5 9
Hence ⌊ 1 0 0 A ⌋ = 3 9 1
Note 1:- The function x ( x 2 + b ) s i n ( a x ) is continuous for all x and all a and b>0. The partial derivative to it is continuous for all x and a and b>0. The improper integral of the function is uniformly convergent for all a by M-test .The improper integral of the partial derivative of the function is uniformly convergent for all positive a .Hence justification of interchange of derivative and integral sign is valid as these form a sufficient set of conditions for us to do so.
Note 2:- I have used the operator method for finding the solution to the ordinary differential equation in terms of a using auxiliary equations,complimentary functions and particular integrals. These are pretty standard things and can be found in any elementary level differential equations book.
Usually People Use Residue Theorem to solve this kind of problem but I did it using Feynmann Technique and found it very interesting as it leads to many generalizations. Please upvote if you liked the problem and the solution !.