∫ 0 1 1 + x 2 8 ln ( 1 + x ) d x = a ln b
The equation above is true for a constant a and some prime number b .
Find b a to 2 decimal places.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Please use \sec, \log and \tan in LaTex.
Log in to reply
Well sir, I am new to latex so I am still learning like today only figured out how to align lines.
Log in to reply
Just add a backward slash \ to everything they suggested, make sure to give space between them so that secx isn't written \secx but \sec x, and wallah, its fast.
Log in to reply
@Devbrat Dandotiya – Well I don't want to mess it up right now so i am not taking any risks. But I am sure I will try it next time.
I know. I was complaining. Just letting you know,
Log in to reply
@Chew-Seong Cheong – Sure sir I will do it next time onwards
I have a doubt... Sorry if it sounds stupid as I don't know much of calculus... In the question the LHS side can be condensed down to a constant figure like π l n 2 . The RHS however has 2 variables, So I plotted x l n y = π l n 2 (after I referred the explanations) and I got a Set of answers not just one answer (even for cases where y = other prime numbers like 3 & 5). a/b is also different for different cases. Shouldn't there be multiple answers?? Again sorry if this is stupid...
Log in to reply
Well there are multiple answers but here only one answer is possible because the limits are specific. That is it is said to intregrate from 0 to 1. And u are also not supposed to plot xlny for values, for intregration we need the area under the graph between the limts. I have simplified my solution try understanding it better now
Log in to reply
What I plotted was RHS = constant.... The constant is the area under the graph for given function from x=0 to x=1.... The answer to the integral is only one but one can have multiple answers for a and b... What I am trying to say is π ln 2 is also equal to (aproximately) 1.98 ln 3
Log in to reply
@Siddhesh Umarjee – Well then it is a problem " in which way question is stated ?", then you are right. I thought it was pi and 2 because when I intregrate I get pi ln2 directly
Log in to reply
@Omek K – I used the fact that area under graph is the necessary integration and found out it was approx 2.17 but then couldn't work out what a and b were😐....
Log in to reply
@Siddhesh Umarjee – Oh I see that is see that why u were telling that there were multiple answers.
@Percy Jackson hey can I add a alternative approach (not the approaches mentioned in the solutions)
Since nobody used a simple graph, here it is!! First, let's create a graphic representation of our question. To have a graphic using our a and b, substitute them with x and y.
Next, try some prime numbers and which they intersect with a known constant.
So the answer is π/2!!This solution has been posted after given time. This will not be considered.
Log in to reply
you did say that solutions posted on April first or before will be graded.
But it was April 1st include, not excluded, on your page... :(
Or is it simply that we are not in the same time zone? It was ~23h at the time of the post...
Okay, so a couple of nice solutions have already been given and in my initial answer I also used the substitution x = tan ( u ) .
This is why I wanted to try something a bit "less trigonometric" :) My main goal is to substitute in such a way, that there will be some kind of multiplication or division in the logarithm, so that I can pull it apart while keeping the form of the denominator intact.
Through a LOT of playing around I found the substitution x = 1 + u 1 − u to work. So let me walk you through how the calculation goes.
First, let's do the differentials: x d x = 1 + u 1 − u = − ( 1 + u ) 2 2 d u .
Now the function arguments: 1 + x 1 + x 2 1 + x 2 1 = 1 + 1 + u 1 − u = 1 + u 2 = ( 1 + u ) 2 ( 1 + u ) 2 + ( 1 − u ) 2 = ( 1 + u ) 2 2 ( 1 + u 2 ) ∣ ( ) − 1 = 2 ( 1 + u 2 ) ( 1 + u ) 2 .
If we let I be 8 1 -times our integral, we find I x = 1 + u 1 − u ⟹ I 2 I I 8 I ⟹ b a = ∫ 0 1 1 + x 2 ln ( 1 + x ) d x = − ∫ 1 0 ln ( 1 + u 2 ) ⋅ 2 ( 1 + u 2 ) ( 1 + u ) 2 ⋅ ( 1 + u ) 2 2 d u = ∫ 0 1 1 + u 2 ln ( 2 ) − ln ( 1 + u ) d u = ln ( 2 ) ∫ 0 1 1 + u 2 1 d u − ∫ 0 1 1 + u 2 ln ( 1 + u ) d u = ln ( 2 ) arctan 1 − I ∣ + I = ln ( 2 ) ⋅ 4 π ∣ : 2 = 8 π ln ( 2 ) ∣ ⋅ 8 = π ln ( 2 ) = a ln ( b ) = 2 π ≈ 1 . 5 7
I did the x = tan(y) substitution and then got the $(1+tan(y) and then $log(sin(y) + cos(y))dy - $log(cos(y)dy . After dividing by 1/log(1/sqrt(2)) , we get $log(cos(y-pi/4)dy - $log(cos(y)dy . $log(cos(x) dx seems to be of the form xlog(cos(x). But unfortunately, i got the limits of integration wrong :( . Anyway, great problem and solutions !!
Similar solution with others'
I = ∫ 0 1 1 + x 2 8 ln ( 1 + x ) d x = ∫ 0 4 π 1 + tan 2 θ 8 ln ( 1 + tan θ ) ⋅ sec 2 θ d θ = ∫ 0 4 π 8 ln ( 1 + tan θ ) d θ = 4 ∫ 0 4 π ( ln ( 1 + tan θ ) + ln ( 1 + tan ( 4 π − θ ) ) ) d θ = 4 ∫ 0 4 π ( ln ( 1 + tan θ ) + ln ( 1 + 1 + tan θ 1 − tan θ ) ) d θ = 4 ∫ 0 4 π ( ln ( 1 + tan θ ) + ln ( 1 + tan θ 2 ) ) d θ = 4 ∫ 0 4 π ( ln ( 1 + tan θ ) + ln 2 − ln ( 1 + tan θ ) ) d θ = 4 ∫ 0 4 π ln 2 d θ = 4 θ ln 2 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ 0 4 π = π ln 2 Let x = tan θ ⟹ d x = sec 2 θ d θ Note that sec 2 θ = 1 + tan 2 θ By reflection ∫ a b f ( x ) d x = ∫ a b f ( a + b − x ) d x
Therefore b a = 2 π ≈ 1 . 5 7 .
I = ∫ 0 1 1 + x 2 ln ( 1 + x ) d x l e t x = tan u ⇒ d x = sec 2 u d u ⇒ I = ∫ x = 0 x = 1 1 + t a n 2 u ln ( 1 + tan u ) sec 2 u d u I = ∫ u = 0 u = 4 π ln ( 1 + tan u ) d u . . . . . . . . . . [ 1 ] = ∫ 0 4 π ln ( 1 + tan ( 4 π − u ) ) d u ∵ ∫ 0 a f ( x ) d x = ∫ 0 a f ( a − x ) d x = ∫ 0 4 π ln ( 1 + 1 + tan u 1 − tan u ) d u = ∫ 0 4 π ln ( 1 + tan u 2 ) d u = ∫ 0 4 π ln ( 2 ) d u − ∫ 0 4 π ln ( 1 + tan u ) d u = 4 π ln 2 − ∫ 0 4 π ln ( 1 + tan u ) d u . . . . . . . . . . [ 2 ] [ 1 ] a n d [ 2 ] ⇒ ∫ 0 4 π ln ( 1 + tan u ) d u = 4 π ln 2 − ∫ 0 4 π ln ( 1 + tan u ) d u ⇒ I = 4 π ln 2 − I ⇒ 8 I = π ln 2 ⇒ ∫ 0 1 1 + x 2 8 ln ( 1 + x ) d x = π ln 2 ⇒ a = π , b = 2 ⇒ b a = 2 π ≈ 1 . 5 7 0 7 . . .
P r o o f o f b l u e s t a t e m e n t : I = ∫ 0 a f ( a − x ) d x l e t u = a − x ⇒ d x = − d u ⇒ I = − ∫ x = 0 x = a f ( u ) d u = − ∫ u = a u = 0 f ( u ) d u = ∫ 0 a f ( u ) d u = ∫ 0 a f ( x ) d x ⇒ ∫ 0 a f ( a − x ) d x = ∫ 0 a f ( x ) d x
Note : the substitution made should be such that it can break the above equation into a function and its derivative.
In the above case ,this can be achieved by substituting x = t a n θ
Differentiating both sides we get,
d x = s e c 2 θ d θ .
C a n c e l l i n g ( 1 + t a n 2 θ ) a n d ( s e c 2 θ )
We get
8 ∗ ∫ 0 1 l n ( 1 + t a n θ ) d θ
0 − − − [ L O W E R ‿ L I M I T ]
4 π − − − − [ U P P E R ‿ L I M I T ]
Using the property of definite integrals : ∫ 0 a f ( x ) = ∫ 0 a f ( a − x ) d x
Therefore, T = 8 ∗ ∫ 0 4 π l n ( 1 + t a n 4 π − θ ) d θ -------- ✿
⇒ T = 8 ∗ ∫ 0 4 π l n 1 + 1 + t a n θ 1 − t a n θ d θ
t a n 4 π = 1
⇒ T = 8 ∗ ∫ 0 4 π l n 1 + t a n θ 1 + t a n θ + 1 − t a n θ d θ
T = 8 ∗ ∫ 0 4 π l n 1 + t a n θ 2 d θ
= > T = 8 ∗ ∫ 0 4 π l n ( 2 ) − l n ( 1 + t a n θ ) d θ ---- ✪
Adding ✪ and ✿ so that the equation gets reduced to ln 2
Comparing the two equations we came to know that ,
a = π
b = 2
Hence 1 . 5 7 is the correct answer!
1. ∫ 0 1
2. 2 π
3. t a n ( a − b ) = 1 + t a n a t a n b t a n a − t a n b
4. θ
5. l o g e
6. ‿
∫ 0 1 1 + x 2 8 ln ( x + 1 ) d x is a constant, hence its derivative = 0 , a , b are constants therefore d b , d a are meaningless
Log in to reply
that's why I couldn't find any mistake in my first ans,cries
Btw I've edited my ans ,you can check it out!
thanks though
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Thought of using Maclaurin series to expand log(1+x) but it was too long then I took to this solution.
First substitute x = t a n θ , then limits of intregral would be in terms of θ .
Now t a n − 1 x = θ . Therefore the limits would become t a n − 1 ( 1 ) and t a n − 1 ( 0 ) which would be 4 π and 0 respectively.
In my solution all the log are to the base e.
x d x = t a n θ = s e c 2 θ d θ
Then the intregral would become
Q = 8 ∫ 0 4 π 1 + x 2 l o g ( 1 + x ) d x = 8 ∫ 0 4 π 1 + t a n 2 θ l o g ( 1 + t a n θ ) s e c 2 θ d θ = 8 ∫ 0 4 π s e c 2 θ l o g ( 1 + t a n θ ) s e c 2 θ d θ = 8 ∫ 0 4 π l o g ( 1 + t a n θ ) d θ − − − > e q 1
Now using ∫ 0 a f ( x ) d x = ∫ 0 a f ( a − x ) d x . We get
Q = 8 ∫ 0 4 π l o g ( 1 + t a n ( 4 π − θ ) ) d θ = 8 ∫ 0 4 π l o g ( 1 + 1 + t a n θ t a n ( 4 π ) t a n ( 4 π ) − t a n θ ) d θ = 8 ∫ 0 4 π l o g ( 1 + 1 + t a n θ 1 − t a n θ ) d θ = 8 ∫ 0 4 π l o g ( 1 + t a n θ 2 ) d θ = 8 ∫ 0 4 π l o g 2 − l o g ( 1 + t a n θ ) d θ − − − > e q 2
Adding eq 1 and 2. We get,
2 Q Q = 8 ∫ 0 4 π l o g 2 d θ = 4 ( 4 π − 0 ) l o g 2 = π l o g 2
So the ans is 2 π = 1.57.