If ∫ 1 ∞ x x 2 − 1 ln ( x 4 − 2 x 2 + 2 ) d x = π ln ( 2 + α 2 ) where α is positive integer.
Find the value of α + 3 .
This problem appeared in American Mathematical Monthly, 2020 May as problem 12184-05 which was proposed by P. Perfetti , Italy where the original problem was to prove the closed form .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
An easier way to evaluate I 2 (this is a very well-known result but I think it should be mentioned) -
I = ∫ 0 2 π ln ( cos x ) d x = ∫ 0 2 π ln ( sin x ) d x ∴ 2 I = ∫ 0 2 π ln ( sin x ⋅ cos x ) d x = ∫ 0 2 π ln ( 2 1 sin 2 x ) d x = ∫ 0 2 π ln ( sin 2 x ) d x − 2 π ln ( 2 ) = I − 2 π ln ( 2 )
by substituting 2 x → x .
⇒ I 2 = − 2 π ln ( 2 ) = − π ln ( 4 )
Log in to reply
I'm familiar with it. It makes easy with upper bound π / 2 . How will you evaluate if the upper bould is other than π / 2 ?
One can even solve this integral using Riemann summation.
Log in to reply
Since
I 0 = ∫ 0 2 π ln ( sin 2 x ) d x = 2 1 ∫ 0 π ln ( sin x ) d x
By substituting 2 x → x . Now
I 0 = 2 1 ( ∫ 0 2 π ln ( sin x ) d x + ∫ 2 π π ln ( sin x ) d x ) = 2 1 ( I + ∫ 0 2 π ln ( sin ( x + 2 π ) ) ) d x = 2 1 I + 2 1 ∫ 0 2 π ln ( cos x ) d x = I
By substituting x − 2 π = u and since sin ( 2 π + x ) = cos x .
Log in to reply
@N. Aadhaar Murty – You still dont get what I'm saying. Have a look at this problem .
Log in to reply
@Naren Bhandari – Sorry bout that - somehow I thought my solution wasn't clear and you were asking about that. You're right of course, the 2 π does make it easier. Also, I think I'll have to some background study before I can go into your problem - it seems fairly complex.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Problem 12184-05
American Mathematical Monthly, May 2020
Proposed by P. Perfetti, Italy
Prove ∫ 1 ∞ x x 2 − 1 ln ( x 4 − 2 x 2 + 2 ) d x = π ln ( 2 + 2 )
Proposed solution by: Narendra Bhandari, National Academy of Science and technology, Pokhara University,Bajura,Nepal
We make substitution of x 2 − 1 = y ⇒ x = y + 1 giving us ∫ 0 ∞ y + 1 y ln ( ( y + 1 ) 4 − 2 y ) 2 y + 1 d y = 2 1 ∫ 0 ∞ ( y + 1 ) y ln ( y 2 + 1 ) d y further we substitute y = tan 2 θ ⇒ d y = 2 tan θ sec 2 θ d θ and the latter integral becomes ∫ 0 2 π ln ( 1 + tan 4 θ ) d θ = I 1 ∫ 0 2 π ln ( sin 4 θ + cos 4 θ ) d θ − I 2 ∫ 0 2 π ln ( cos 4 θ ) d θ Note that for all a , b > 0 we have the Lemma and which I proved here is MSE ∫ 0 2 π ln ( b 2 sin 2 θ + a 2 cos 2 θ ) d θ = π ln 2 a + b and sin 4 θ + cos 4 θ = 1 − 2 sin 2 θ cos 2 θ = 1 − 2 sin 2 2 θ = 2 1 ( 2 cos 2 2 θ + sin 2 2 θ ) thus integral I 1 = ∫ 0 2 π ln ( cos 2 2 θ + 2 1 sin 2 2 θ ) d θ = 2 1 ∫ 0 π ln ( cos 2 ϕ + 2 1 sin 2 ϕ ) d ϕ = π ln 2 2 1 + 2 ⋯ ( 1 ) the latter result is obtained using the Lemma above
And for I 2 is easy to compute the integral using Fourier series of ln ( cos x ) for 0 ≤ θ < 2 π . That is ∫ 0 2 π ln ( cos θ ) d θ = ∫ 0 2 π ( − ln 2 − k = 1 ∑ ∞ k ( − 1 ) k cos ( 2 k θ ) ) d θ = − 2 π ln 2 − k = 1 ∑ ∞ k ( − 1 ) k ∫ 0 2 π cos ( 2 k θ ) d θ = − [ k = 1 ∑ ∞ k 2 ( − 1 ) k sin ( 2 k θ ) ] 0 2 π = − 2 1 k = 1 ∑ ∞ k 2 ( − 1 ) k sin ( 2 π k ) the obtained series is 0 as sin ( 2 π k ) = 0 for positive integers k and hence I 2 = 4 ∫ 0 2 π ln ( cos θ ) d θ = − 2 4 π ln 2 = − π ln ( 4 ) ⋯ ( 2 ) from ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) we have I 1 − I 2 = π ln ( 2 2 1 + 2 ) + π ln ( 4 ) = π ln ( 2 + 2 ) which completes the proof.
Without fourier cosine series . Also it is easy to see that ∫ 0 2 π ln ( cos x ) d x = 2 1 C l 2 ( π − π ) − 2 π ln 2 = − 2 π ln 2 where C l 2 ( x ) is Clausen Function of order 2 and C l 2 ( 0 ) = 0 .
I wish to share the solution due to Farid Khelili which is as