x 3 − 4 4 x 2 + 5 5 6 x − 1 8 0 5
Let x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , … x n be the positive integers that make the above expression a (positive) prime number. Then, find the value of i = 1 ∑ n x i .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
This solution is incomplete.
You still have to check if one of the expressions is equal to -1, and the other is a negative prime.
I got 33... I believe 15 isn't an answer since f ( 1 5 ) = 1 0 isn't prime.
Also, to make the solution complete, you should think about one of the factors being − 1 .
Log in to reply
Oh yeah! its indeed 10.Sir please help me where I have gone wrong?
Log in to reply
You say "For the expression to be prime, one of the factors must be 1" (or -1). True, that is necessary, but not sufficient. If one of the factors is ± 1 , the expression may or may not be prime, depending on the other factor.You need to check each case.
When you put x = 15 then the quadratic becomes 1 but the linear factor x-5 becomes 10 which makes it a non prime.
You can edit the question by asking i = 1 ∑ n x i + 1 8
Log in to reply
@Rajdeep Dhingra – Yes, I have edited the question.
Well , I appropriately edited the question and my solution.Thanks for your report.
Also I wish you should have been awarded the 100 points that you lost due to my mistake.
Log in to reply
I'm not in this for the points, but for the fun ;) No worries.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Wow Sir! I am really very impressed by your spirit! Great, sir!
@Otto Bretscher – Sir , can we post a note where we can share this experience , because not me but many people like may tend to not to consider the cases of ± 1 and may go wrong in future.
Log in to reply
@Nihar Mahajan – I'm a lil busy with work right now, but I trust that you can do it. Just write "For the expression to be prime, it is necessary that one of the factors be 1 or -1"... then examine all the cases as you did, but add x=4 (you don't get integers when the other factor is -1).
At the end say: "Now let's see which of these cases produce a prime", and list them all, f ( 6 ) = 1 6 3 , f ( 1 5 ) = 1 0 , f ( 2 4 ) = 1 9 , f ( 4 ) = − 2 2 1 and pick the ones that give you primes, 6 and 24. Hope that helps...
Thanks. Those who answered 33 have been marked correct.
I have rephrased the question, and the correct answer is now 30.
In future, if you spot any errors with a problem, you can “report” it by selecting "report problem" in the “dot dot dot” menu in the lower right corner. This will notify the problem creator who can fix the issues.
Why did you tell to add 18 to the final answer?
Log in to reply
Actually , I had got a wrong answer first.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
x 3 − 4 4 x 2 + 5 5 6 x − 1 8 0 5 ⇒ ( x − 5 ) ( x 2 − 3 9 x + 3 6 1 )
For the expression to be prime , one of its factors must be 1 .
→ x − 5 = 1 ⇒ x = 6 → x 2 − 3 9 x + 3 6 1 = 1 ⇒ x 2 − 3 9 x + 3 6 0 = 0 ⇒ ( x − 1 5 ) ( x − 2 4 ) = 0 ⇒ x = ( 1 5 , 2 4 )
When x = 1 5 , the polynomial becomes 1 0 and is not a prime.
So, required sum = 6 + 2 4 = 3 0