Is the answer 17?

Find the number of integers a a such that a 2 3 a 19 a^2 - 3a - 19 is divisible by 289 289 .


The answer is 0.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

3 solutions

We require that a 2 3 a 19 = 289 k a 2 3 a ( 19 + 289 k ) = 0 a^{2} - 3a - 19 = 289k \Longrightarrow a^{2} - 3a - (19 + 289k) = 0 for some integer k . k.

By the quadratic formula we then have that

a = 3 ± 9 + 4 ( 19 + 289 k ) 2 = 3 ± 85 + 1156 k 2 . a = \dfrac{3 \pm \sqrt{9 + 4*(19 + 289k)}}{2} = \dfrac{3 \pm \sqrt{85 + 1156k}}{2}.

As we are looking for integer values for a , a, we will require that

85 + 1156 k = 17 ( 5 + 68 k ) = n 2 85 + 1156k = 17(5 + 68k) = n^{2}

for some integer n . n. With 17 17 being prime, since 17 n 2 17 | n^{2} we know that 1 7 2 n 2 , 17^{2} | n^{2}, and so 5 + 68 k 5 + 68k would have to be divisible by 17. 17. But as 5 + 68 k 5 ( m o d 17 ) 5 + 68k \equiv 5 \pmod{17} this is not the case, and so 85 + 1156 k 85 + 1156k cannot be a perfect square. Thus, there are 0 \boxed{0} integer solutions for a . a.

How do you explain that if 17|n^2 then 17^2|n^2 ? By the way ,neat and awesome solution . Mindblowing !

Raven Herd - 5 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for the compliment! As for your question, since 17 17 is prime and divides n 2 n^{2} we must have that 17 n . 17|n. So in the prime factorization of n 2 n^{2} the factor of 17 17 must appear (at least) twice, i.e., 1 7 2 n 2 . 17^{2}|n^{2}.

Brian Charlesworth - 5 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Got that. Sir, you may not remember a little time ago I asked your advice about where to study NT from.I wanted to thank you because now I am beginning to get an edge over it.After geometry it has become my favourite topic.One more thing .Today ,I published a note named "The most beautiful solution ever".If users like you would contribute to it then it might prove useful to the fellow Brilliantians.

Raven Herd - 5 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Raven Herd Glad to hear that you are enjoying Number Theory. :) As for your new note, I'll have to give some thought as to which solutions I've seen on Brilliant that I would consider "beautiful". I've seen many elegant solutions, but I haven't kept a list of them so they may be difficult to track down before deciding whether they qualify as beautiful.

Brian Charlesworth - 5 years, 6 months ago

Hi Brian. There's an error in your discriminant value: it should be 85 + 1,156k (289 * 4 = 1,156). I still end up with the same result of the discriminant being a non-perfect square since:

85 + 1156k = 17(5 + 68k)

which requires 5 + 68k = 17^(2n-1). But we now obtain: 5 = 17^(2n-1) - 68k = 17[17^(2n-2) - 4k] => 5/17 = 17^(2n-2) - 4k => NOT POSSIBLE for positive integers n and k. Hence, there are no integers a such that 289 | a^2 - 3a - 19.

tom engelsman - 1 year, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Yup, you're right. Thanks for catching that. :)

Brian Charlesworth - 1 year, 9 months ago

No prob....sorry it took 4 years to catch it!

tom engelsman - 1 year, 9 months ago
Ivan Koswara
Nov 2, 2015

Hack: If there is any satisfying a a , then a + 289 a+289 also satisfies the condition. Thus there can be no such a a , otherwise there would be infinitely many such a a , which doesn't fit to Brilliant's answer format.

This method was superrrb!!!

Anibrata Bhattacharya - 5 years, 7 months ago

Let's take a 2 3 a 19 = ( a 10 ) ( a + 7 ) + 51 a^{2}-3a-19=(a-10)(a+7)+51 .

Suppose 289 289 divides a 2 3 a 19 a^{2}-3a-19 , 17 17 must divide ( a 10 ) (a-10) or ( a + 7 ) (a+7) .

If 17 17 divides a 10 a-10 , a 10 ( m o d 17 ) a \equiv 10 \pmod {17} . Hence, a + 7 10 + 7 17 0 ( m o d 17 ) a+7 \equiv 10+7 \equiv 17 \equiv 0 \pmod {17} .

If 17 17 divides a + 7 a+7 , a 7 10 ( m o d 17 ) a \equiv -7 \equiv 10 \pmod {17} . Hence, a 10 10 10 0 ( m o d 17 ) a-10 \equiv 10-10 \equiv 0 \pmod {17} .

Hence whenever 17 17 divides one of a 10 a-10 and a + 7 a+7 , it must divide the other also.

Thus, 1 7 2 = 289 17^{2}=289 divides ( a 10 ) ( a + 7 ) (a-10)(a+7) .

Since 289 289 divides ( a 10 ) ( a + 7 ) (a-10)(a+7) , 289 289 must divide 51 51 which is impossible.

Hence, there is no integer a a such that 289 289 divides a 2 3 a 19 a^{2}-3a-19 .

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...