2 5 ( 4 a 1 2 + 1 ) ( 4 a 2 2 + 1 ) ⋯ ( 4 a 5 2 + 1 )
Let a 1 , a 2 , … , a 5 denote the roots to the equation m = 1 ∑ 5 m x m = 0 .
Find the value of the expression above.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
THANKYOU AGAIN!!
Log in to reply
My solution was not very elegant but I did get estimates for the individual factors:
4 ∗ a 1 2 + 1 = 1 . 6 4 3 5 8 2 5 5 8 + 1 . 5 4 1 5 7 6 5 4 3 ∗ i
4 ∗ a 2 2 + 1 = 1 . 6 4 3 5 8 2 5 5 8 − 1 . 5 4 1 5 7 6 5 4 3 ∗ i
4 ∗ a 3 2 + 1 = − . 7 6 3 5 8 2 5 5 7 8 + . 7 4 7 7 7 2 4 9 7 5 ∗ i
4 ∗ a 4 2 + 1 = − . 7 6 3 5 8 2 5 5 7 8 − . 7 4 7 7 7 2 4 9 7 5 ∗ i
4 ∗ a 5 2 + 1 = 1
The expression we had to evaluate was found on my TI84+ calculator as 1 4 5 + 0 ∗ i
If you want to look at the individual roots:
a 1 = . 5 3 7 8 3 2 2 7 4 9 + . 3 5 8 2 8 4 6 8 6 3 ∗ i
a 2 = . 5 3 7 8 3 2 2 7 4 9 − . 3 5 8 2 8 4 6 8 6 3 ∗ i
a 3 = . 1 3 7 8 3 2 2 7 4 9 + . 6 7 8 1 5 4 3 8 9 1 ∗ i
a 4 = . 1 3 7 8 3 2 2 7 4 9 − . 6 7 8 1 5 4 3 8 9 1 ∗ i
a 5 = 0
Log in to reply
Good first try. The hard part is to prove that the answer is exactly equals to 145.
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – I agree !! My old brain is having trouble grasping some of the elegant proofs and solutions I see on Brilliant. I am also trying to learn how to use LaTeX. I wish I was 40 years younger!
Log in to reply
@Bob Kadylo – Here's a good place to start !
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – WOW !!! Thank you very much for this super tip !!
did you multiply by 25?
Log in to reply
@Joel Yip – What I showed were the factors and raw roots before 25 was utilized.
Log in to reply
@Bob Kadylo – i meant did you multiply the 4(raw roots)^2+1 together with the 25?
Log in to reply
@Joel Yip – Yes, I did - to get the value of the expression so I could submit the answer of 145. Just did it again to make sure. Still works.
I did the same method 2
I think the last line, to the left of the answer box, should have both denominators of 32 changed to 16. Then the 4 4 in front would cancel the product of 1 6 ∗ 1 6 across the denominators. This comment refers to the solution above by Aareyan Monzoor.
Log in to reply
Hint : If a polynomial f ( x ) has roots a 1 , a 2 , … , a n , then the polynomial for f ( x ) has roots a 1 2 , a 2 2 … , a n 2 .
Log in to reply
(I think. Might be wrong)
That's not exactly Vieta's. That's just "transformation of roots".
Yes, sometimes transformation of roots is done via evaluating coefficient-wise using Vieta's. But in your case, you are proposing a direct algebraic calculation (IE shifting and squaring) that avoids vieta.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Yeah. To be more precise, what I've done is transformation of roots, then Vieta's formula.
(Adapted from Aareyan Manzoor's method. Rewritten for clarity.)
Notice that the given equation has a root x = 0 , which can be ignored since in the given expression, 4 ( 0 ) 2 + 1 = 1 , which is the multiplicative identity. Hence let a 5 = 0 , and f ( x ) = m = 1 ∑ 5 m x m − 1 = 5 n = 1 ∏ 4 ( x − a n ) .
Applying the identity ( a + i b ) ( a − i b ) = a 2 + b 2 , we can reform the given expression:
2 5 n = 1 ∏ 4 ( 4 a n 2 + 1 ) = 2 5 n = 1 ∏ 4 ( 2 a n + i ) ( 2 a n − i ) = 2 5 n = 1 ∏ 4 [ 2 ( − 2 i − a n ) ] n = 1 ∏ 4 [ 2 ( 2 i − a n ) ] = [ 2 4 f ( − 2 i ) ] [ 2 4 f ( 2 i ) ] = 2 8 f ( − 2 i ) f ( 2 i ) .
As has been noted, the above may be computed easily. For variety's sake, I will present a method besides AGP/differentiating GP, which uses the aforementioned identity:
2 8 f ( − 2 i ) f ( 2 i ) = 2 8 [ m = 1 ∑ 5 m ( − 2 i ) m − 1 ] [ m = 1 ∑ 5 m ( 2 i ) m − 1 ] = 2 8 [ 5 ( 2 1 ) 4 − 3 ( 2 1 ) 2 + 1 + 4 i ( 2 1 ) 3 − 2 i ( 2 1 ) ] [ 5 ( 2 1 ) 4 − 3 ( 2 1 ) 2 + 1 − 4 i ( 2 1 ) 3 + 2 i ( 2 1 ) ] = 1 6 2 [ ( 1 6 5 − 4 3 + 1 ) 2 + ( 8 4 − 2 2 ) 2 ] = ( 5 − 1 2 + 1 6 ) 2 + ( 8 − 1 6 ) 2 = 9 2 + 8 2 = 1 4 5 .
Here's another solution without using complex numbers:
One of the roots of the polynomial is
0
which leaves us with
5
x
4
+
4
x
3
+
3
x
2
+
2
x
+
1
=
5
(
x
−
a
1
)
(
x
−
a
2
)
(
x
−
a
3
)
(
x
−
a
4
)
⟹ d x d ( 1 + x + . . . + x 5 ) = ( x − 1 ) 2 5 x 6 − 6 x 5 + 1 = 5 ( x − a 1 ) ( x − a 2 ) ( x − a 3 ) ( x − a 4 )
5
x
6
−
6
x
5
+
1
=
5
(
x
−
1
)
2
(
x
−
a
1
)
(
x
−
a
2
)
(
x
−
a
3
)
(
x
−
a
4
)
Replacing
x
in
5
x
6
−
6
x
5
+
1
with
x
and rationalising, we get
2
5
x
6
−
3
6
x
5
+
1
0
x
3
+
1
=
2
5
(
x
−
1
)
2
(
x
−
a
1
2
)
(
x
−
a
2
2
)
(
x
−
a
3
2
)
(
x
−
a
4
2
)
Substitute
x
=
4
−
1
to get the required value.
SWEEEEET! Upvoted
m = 1 ∑ 5 m x m ⇒ x + 2 x 2 + 3 x 3 + 4 x 4 + 5 x 5 x ( 5 x 4 + 4 x 3 + 3 x 2 + 2 x + 1 ) = 0 = 0 = 0
This implies that one of the roots is 0 and let it be a 5 = 0 . Then we have:
\begin{aligned} 25 \prod_{m=1}^5 (4a_m^2 +1) & = 25 \prod_{m=1}^\color{#3D99F6}{4} (4a_m^2 +1) \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \small \color{#3D99F6}{\text{Since }4a_5^2 + 1 = 1} \\ & = 25 \prod_{m=1}^4 (2a_m^2 +i) (2a_m^2 -i) \\ & = 25 \prod_{m=1}^4 (2a_m^2 +i) \prod_{m=1}^4 (2a_m^2 -i) \\ & = 25 \left(16\prod_{m=1}^4 a_m +8i\sum_{cyc}a_1a_2a_3 -4\sum_{cyc}a_1a_2 -2i\sum_{m=1} ^4 a_m + 1 \right) \\ & \quad \quad \quad \times \left(16\prod_{m=1}^4 a_m - 8i\sum_{cyc}a_1a_2a_3 -4\sum_{cyc}a_1a_2 + 2i\sum_{m=1} ^4 a_m + 1 \right) \\ & = 25 \left(16 \color{#3D99F6}{\left(\frac{1}{5}\right)} +8i\color{#3D99F6}{\left(-\frac{2}{5}\right)} -4 \color{#3D99F6}{\left(\frac{3}{5}\right)} -2i\color{#3D99F6}{\left(-\frac{4}{5}\right)} + 1 \right) \\ & \quad \quad \quad \times \left(16 \color{#3D99F6}{\left(\frac{1}{5}\right)} - 8i\color{#3D99F6}{\left(-\frac{2}{5}\right)} -4 \color{#3D99F6}{\left(\frac{3}{5}\right)} + 2i\color{#3D99F6}{\left(-\frac{4}{5}\right)} + 1 \right) \quad \quad \small \color{#3D99F6}{\text{By Vieta's formulas}} \\ & = \frac{25}{25}(16 - 16i - 12 + 8i + 5) (16 + 16i - 12 - 8i + 5) \\ & = (9 - 8i)(9+8i) = 81 + 64 = \boxed{145} \end{aligned}
quite a nice solution ehh.
GREAT WORK!
Log in to reply
Again I made an arithmetic error (like with Vieta's Take Too Long). Multiply 1 + 2 x + 3 x 2 + 4 x 3 + 5 x 4 = 0 and 1 − 2 x + 3 x 2 − 4 x 3 + 5 x 4 = 0 to get 2 5 x 8 + 1 4 x 6 + 3 x 4 + 2 x 2 + 1 = 0 . Then the answer is 2 5 − 4 ( 1 4 ) + 4 2 ( 3 ) − 4 3 ( 2 ) + 4 4 = 1 4 5 .
Log in to reply
How do you know you need to multiply these 2 quintic equations?
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – (Take a 5 = 0 for obvious reasons.) In terms of the roots, the product of those equations will take the form 2 5 ( x 2 − a 1 2 ) ( x 2 − a 2 2 ) ( x 2 − a 3 2 ) ( x 2 − a 4 2 ) , since all the roots of one will be the negative of the roots of the other. Then apply Vieta's formulas. Whenever the sum of the product of the squares of roots has an odd number of the factors in each product (i.e., has a negative sign in the front in Vieta's formulas), then negating the corresponding coefficient will give the sum over product of n roots (or squares of roots) as it appears in the expression of interest after it is expanded (not including the power of 4 in front). For the ones with the positive sign in front (i.e. with an even number of factors in the product it is being summed over in Vieta's formulas), simply take the coefficients corresponding to those as is. These numbers can then be substituted straight in. There's not really any complicated algebraic manipulation involved.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
neclect the x=0 solution. 4 ∗ 0 2 + 1 = 1 which doesnt affect the product. f ( x ) = 5 x 4 + 4 x 3 + 3 x 2 + 2 x + 1 = 5 ( x − a 1 ) ( x − a 2 ) ( x − a 3 ) ( x − a 4 ) . remember this:the basic definition of a polynomial.we have the given expression equal to 2 5 ( 4 4 ( 2 i − a 1 ) ( − 2 i − a 1 ) ( 2 i − a 2 ) ( − 2 i − a 2 ) . . . ( 2 i − a 4 ) ( − 2 i − a 4 ) ) = 4 4 ( 5 ( 2 i − a 1 ) ( 2 i − a 2 ) . . . . ( 2 i − a 4 ) ) ( 5 ( − 2 i − a 1 ) ( − 2 i − a 2 ) . . . . ( − 2 i − a 4 ) ) this is equal to by our above def: 4 4 f ( 2 i ) f ( − 2 i ) it is not hard to compute, you can use AGP or differentiate GP. either ways, the answer will just be 4 4 ( 1 6 − 8 + 9 i ) ( 1 6 − 8 − 9 i ) = 8 2 + 9 2 = 1 4 5