The real number answer to the equation x 3 = x + 1 is x = 3 2 1 + k j + 3 2 1 − k j for positive integer j , k being relative prime. Find 1 6 + j k
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
We can solve the equation from the outset, but given that the value of x is partially given, we can utilize it by cube it, which gives x 3 = ( 3 2 1 + k j + 3 2 1 − k j ) 3 = 1 + 3 x ( 3 4 1 − ( k j ) 2 ) By comparing the coefficient to the original equation, we will get that 3 ( 3 4 1 − k j ) = 1 or simply 4 1 − k j = 2 7 1 , which can be reduced further to k j = 1 0 8 2 3 . Given that both integers are relative prime, it is then concluded that ( j , k ) = ( 2 3 , 1 0 8 ) and 1 6 + j k = 1 6 + 2 4 8 4 = 2 5 0 0 = 5 0
Note: If one try to resolve the equation from the outset without using x provided partially as a guideline, using the Remainder Factor Theorem and Complex Conjugates will result into that two factor of this equation must be the complex number and another as a real number without rationalization, so one may want to set x = a + b or x 3 = a 3 + 3 a b ( x ) + b 3 = x + 1 as a rule. Here, it is easy to observe that a b = 3 1 and a 3 + b 3 = 1 or a 3 + 2 7 a 3 1 = 1 , which may be reduced into 2 7 a 6 − 2 7 a 3 + 1 = 0 = 2 7 ( a 6 − a 3 + 4 1 − 4 1 ) + 1 Or, when trying to put it into perfect square and reducing the coefficient ( a 3 − 2 1 ) 2 − 1 0 8 2 3 = 0 Which means a = 3 2 1 + 1 0 8 2 3 ; b = 3 2 1 − 1 0 8 2 3 Notice that if you swap a and b , the result will be the same. The rest is followed by the above solution. It is worth nothing that this number is called Plastic number , hence the name of the question.
Same method. brilliant solution
Log in to reply
Same method.That symbol though
Log in to reply
Scared me terribly as soon as I got here
Log in to reply
@Shreyash Rai – I actually want to scare more people by not providing the value of 2 1 at all, but realizing it will be too difficult. This question's difficulty changed between Level 4 and 5, more than I expect it to be around level 3 if the value is provided. If it's not, then it deserves level 4 or 5.
Log in to reply
@Kay Xspre – Actually, isn't it resolvable by cardan's formulas? (Solved this using my dad's college textbook XD)
Log in to reply
@Manuel Kahayon – cardans formulas? could you please elaborate a bit about what in the world is that?
Log in to reply
@Shreyash Rai – They're formulas for solving all cubic equations, like, quadratic equations are to the quadratic formula, as cubic equations are to cardan's formulas
https://brilliant.org/wiki/cardano-method
Log in to reply
@Manuel Kahayon – Oh I see. Thanks for the info!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let a = 3 2 1 + k j and b = 3 2 1 − k j . Then x = a + b and
x 3 ( a + b ) 3 a 3 + 3 a 2 b + 3 a b 2 + b 3 3 a b ( a + b ) + 1 3 a b ( a + b ) a b 3 2 1 + k j × 3 2 1 − k j 3 4 1 − k j 4 1 − k j k j = x + 1 = a + b + 1 = a + b + 1 = a + b + 1 = a + b = 3 1 = 3 1 = 3 1 = 2 7 1 = 4 1 − 2 7 1 = 1 0 8 2 3 Note that a 3 + b 3 = 1 Cubing both sides
Therefore, j = 2 3 , k = 1 0 8 and 1 6 + j k = 1 6 + 2 3 × 1 0 8 = 2 5 0 0 = 5 0 .