Jack and Jill on a Hill

Jack and Jill are standing on a large hill, as shown above. Jill, being a mischievous girl, throws a stone at Jack to break his crown. At what angle, θ \theta , with the inclined plane (in degrees) must Jill aim the stone so that it lands closest to Jack?

Details and Assumptions

  • The hill is sufficiently large, so the stone does not reach Jack for any value of θ \theta .
  • Ignore air resistance.

Inspired by my Physics Teacher


The answer is 60.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

So, first it should be clear that we need to find the maximum range possible for the projectile along the inclined plane. To do that, we can easily derive the formula for the projectile's range and differentiate it to get a maxima. Ok then, let's begin!

Let's consider the initial velocity of the projectile to be ' u u ' m/s and it's angle of projection to the inclined plane as α \alpha as shown in the figure. Let the angle that the inclined plane makes with the horizontal is θ \theta which is 30 {30}^{\circ} in our case.

Notice the components! Notice the components!

Now, as it can be seen from the figure, the component of particle's velocity, perpendicular to the plane is given by v = v sin α { v }_{ \bot } = v\sin{\alpha} and that along the plane is given by v = v cos α { v }_{ \parallel } = v\cos{\alpha} . The perpendicular component is provided a retardation towards the plane given by v = g cos θ { v }_{ \bot } = g\cos{\theta} whereas the parallel component is provided an acceleration along the plane given by v = g sin θ { v }_{ \parallel } = g\sin{\theta} .

Now, the time of flight can be calculated by the double the time it takes for the perpendicular component to be zero, i.e. T = 2 u sin α g cos θ T = \frac {2u\sin{\alpha}} {g\cos{\theta}}

This is the same time that the particle will travel along the plane and it's range, R R can be calculated using the second equation of motion, or:

R = ( u cos α ) 2 u sin α g cos θ + 1 2 ( g sin θ ) ( 2 u sin α g cos θ ) 2 R=(u\cos { \alpha } )\frac { 2u\sin { \alpha } }{ g\cos { \theta } } +\frac { 1 }{ 2 } (g\sin { \theta } )({ \frac { 2u\sin { \alpha } }{ g\cos { \theta } } })^{ 2 }

This equation can be simplified to get something like:

R = 2 u 2 sin α g cos θ ( cos α + sin α sin θ cos θ ) R=\frac { 2{ u }^{ 2 }\sin { \alpha } }{ g\cos { \theta } } (\cos { \alpha } +\frac { \sin { \alpha } \sin { \theta } }{ \cos { \theta } } )

and then:

R = 2 u 2 sin α cos ( α θ ) g cos 2 θ R=\frac { 2{ u }^{ 2 }\sin { \alpha } \cos { (\alpha -\theta ) } }{ g\cos ^{ 2 }{ \theta } } \\

Now, to maximise this range, we simply differentiate it with respect to α \alpha and equate the derivative with 0 0 . Differentiating and equating, we get:

tan α tan ( α θ ) = 0 \tan { \alpha } \tan { (\alpha -\theta ) } =0

Putting tan ( α θ ) = tan α tan θ 1 + tan a tan θ \tan { (\alpha -\theta ) } =\frac { \tan { \alpha } -\tan { \theta } }{ 1+\tan { a } \tan { \theta } } and solving the quadratic equation formed in tan α \tan {\alpha} , we get α = 150 \alpha = {150}^{\circ} or α = 60 \alpha = {60}^{\circ} . Now, since α \alpha can't be obtuse, hence, α = 60 \alpha = {60}^{\circ} is the final answer.

Moderator note:

Very well explained! Thanks for showing the derivation of the formula.

You could have used ,
2 sin ( α ) cos ( α θ ) = sin ( 2 α θ ) + sin ( θ ) 2 \sin(\alpha)\cos(\alpha-\theta) = \sin(2\alpha-\theta) + \sin(\theta)
which is maximum when,
2 α θ = 9 0 2\alpha - \theta = 90^\circ


A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Agreed, but i like differentiating!! :D

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Awesome solution, Abhineet! It's well explained and neatly presented.

I would like to point out an important result.

The range is maximum when the initial velocity is along the line that bisects the angle formed by the vertical and the inclined plane.

In this problem, the angle between the inclined plane and the vertical is 12 0 120^\circ , therefore the initial velocity must make 12 0 2 = 6 0 \frac{120^\circ}{2} = 60^\circ with the plane.

Pranshu Gaba - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Pranshu Gaba Hehe, yeah, i know that, but i thought i'd prove that! :D

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 1 month ago

If Jill were to throw the stone harder (faster) in any other angle between almost throwing horizontally (theta<110°) and throwing the stone in an almost straight line on jack (theta >0), she could of course hit Jack... Why should she be limited to throwing with 90 degrees to the plane only???

Amandus Westin - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Amandus Westin if you're referring to my statement that a l p h a alpha can't be obtuse, then i should probably clarify. What I actually meant was that α \alpha can't be obtuse for the range to be maximum.

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Thank you for clarifying. To me it wasn't really that clear at all that we should calculate the angle leading to the most effective range. Now that I kind of got what the task was meant to be about I could look into your calculations and learn some cool things!

Amandus Westin - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

@Amandus Westin Well, i'm glad i could help! :)

A Former Brilliant Member - 5 years, 1 month ago

Of course, if Jill throws the stone faster then her range will definitely increase. However in the problem, we are supposed to find the optimal angle for which the range is maximized for a fixed velocity. If the inclined plane has a slope of 3 0 30^{\circ} , then throwing the stone at an angle of 6 0 60^\circ maximizes the range. Throwing it at any other angle will reduce the range.

Note that Jill should throw the stone making an angle of 60 degrees with the plane and not 90 degrees.

Pranshu Gaba - 5 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Yeah, I think I get the maths behind it now. It was just that for me the question didn't make sense.

Amandus Westin - 5 years, 1 month ago

Very well explained. +1 !!!

Rishabh Tiwari - 5 years ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...