∫ 1 + x 1 − x d x = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Did the same!
Looking at the integral, first step has to remove nested radical. So I substituted x = t 2 ( d x = 2 t d t ) first. It becomes ∫ 2 t 1 + t 1 − t d t
Now, rationalize the numerator by multiplying by 1 − t which results in 2 ∫ 1 − t 2 t ( 1 − t ) d t 2 ∫ 1 − t 2 t − 1 + ( 1 − t 2 ) d t = 2 ∫ 1 − t 2 t d t − 2 ∫ 1 − t 2 d t + 2 ∫ 1 − t 2 d t
= − 2 1 − t 2 − 2 sin − 1 t + 2 [ 2 t 1 − t 2 + 2 1 sin − 1 t ] + C = ( t − 2 ) 1 − t 2 − sin − 1 y + C = ( x − 2 ) 1 − x + cos − 1 x + C ′
ok let us begin by multiplying root(1-root(x)) up and down, and now follow me
1 + x 1 − x = 1 − x 1 − x = 1 − x 1 − 1 − x x
Now the first part is easy, let us focus on second, let us substitute
x = ( s i n θ ) 2 d x = 2 s i n θ c o s θ d θ 1 − x x = c o s 2 s i n s i n c o s d θ = 2 s i n 2 d θ = 1 − c o s 2 θ
which can be easily integrated to get
θ − 2 1 s i n ( 2 θ ) + c = a r c s i n ( x ) − x 1 − x + c = − a r c c o s ( x ) − x 1 − x + c + π / 2 − a r c c o s ( x ) − x 1 − x + d
the whole integral is (combining first easy part and second needed substitution part becomes
− 2 1 − x + a r c c o s ( x ) + x 1 − x = ( − 2 + x ) 1 − x + a r c c o s ( x )
i hope it is clear
I tried by substituting x=cos(square)2© but that was pretty combursome
Log in to reply
indeed i tried that initially as well, but stopped when it got combursome
Can you fill in the details? Thanks!
Log in to reply
filled the details
Log in to reply
Great, thanks! It did require much more work than just rationalizing. I wonder if @Pranjal Jain was thinking of another approach.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Well, nice solution @Mvs Saketh . Though I prefer algebraic substitution in indefinite integrals and trigonometric in definite ones. So I substituted x = t 2 ( d x = 2 t d t ) first, and then rationalized the numerator by multiplying by 1 − t which results in 2 ∫ 1 − t 2 t ( 1 − t ) d t = 2 ∫ 1 − t 2 t d t − 2 ∫ 1 − t 2 d t + 2 ∫ 1 − t 2 d t = − 2 1 − t 2 − 2 sin − 1 t + 2 [ 2 t 1 − t 2 + 2 1 sin − 1 t ] + C = ( x − 2 ) 1 − x + cos − 1 x + C
Log in to reply
@Pranjal Jain – That is indeed a good short one, and yes i too prefer trignometric for definite so i can use walis formula, but i also tend to avoid terms like root(1-x^2) etc in the numerators as their formulaes are cumbersome and have to be remembered,, derivation might end up wrong due to silly mistakes, :)
Log in to reply
@Mvs Saketh – Exactly Wallis helps a lot in definite. Agreed by the fact that it is tough to remember them, but you just have to do it once. :)
@Pranjal Jain – Oh nice. Can you add this as a separate solution? Thanks!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I = ∫ 1 + x 1 − x d x x = cos 2 t d x = − sin 2 t d t 1 + x 1 − x = 1 + cos t 1 − cos t = tan 2 t = 1 + cos t sin t S u b s t i t u t i n g t h e l a s t v a l u e I = − ∫ 1 + cos t sin t sin 2 t d t I = − ∫ 1 + cos t 2 sin 2 t cos t d t I = − ∫ 1 + cos t 2 ( 1 + cos t ) ( 1 − cos t ) cos t d t I = ∫ 2 ( cos t − 1 ) cos t d t I = ∫ ( 1 + cos 2 t ) − 2 cos t d t I = t + 2 sin 2 t − 2 sin t + C S u b s t i t u t i n g cos x = x I = ( x − 2 ) 1 − x + cos − 1 x + C