Let f be a continuous function satisfying f ( x + y ) = f ( x ) + f ( y ) , for each x , y ∈ R and f ( 1 ) = 2 then ∫ ( 1 + x 2 ) 2 f ( x ) tan − 1 x d x is equal to
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Please explain how we get f ( x ) = 2 x from the recurrence.
Log in to reply
Is it right? I was confused about that part. (I edited)
Log in to reply
Your step "continuing like that" works for integers x only. Hint: Prove f ( x ) = 2 x for the rational numbers. Then, by continuity, f ( x ) = 2 x for all real numbers.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Oh yes, I overlooked that. Thanks for pointing out. Can you give an insight on how can I do this?
Log in to reply
@Aditya Agarwal – The way I think about it, it requires a few steps, but each step is straightforward. Show the following:
(I) f ( 0 ) = 0
(II) f ( − x ) = − f ( x ) for all real x
(III) f ( m ) = 2 m for positive integers m
(IV) f ( m / n ) = 2 m / n for positive integers n , m .
Now the equation f ( x ) = 2 x holds for all real numbers x , by continuity.
Log in to reply
@Otto Bretscher – Okay, I got it thanks. But do I need to edit my answer? Because in JEE you really don't get that much time. In fact, there, you start by making an educated guess and differentiate it. (Reverse of what we are told to do)
Log in to reply
@Aditya Agarwal – Your solution is not complete... in fact, it skips over the key issue.
Let me outline a solution for you:
(I) f ( 0 ) = f ( 0 + 0 ) = f ( 0 ) + f ( 0 ) so f ( 0 ) = 0
(II) 0 = f ( 0 ) = f ( x + ( − x ) ) = f ( x ) + f ( − x ) so f ( − x ) = − f ( x ) for all real x
(III) f ( m ) = f ( 1 + 1 + . . . + 1 ) = f ( 1 ) + f ( 1 ) + . . . + f ( 1 ) = m f ( 1 ) = 2 m for positive integers m
(IV) 2 m = f ( m ) = f ( n m + n m + . . . + n m ) = f ( n m ) + f ( n m ) + . . . + f ( n m ) = n f ( n m ) so f ( n m ) = n 2 m for positive integers m , n .
Now f ( x ) = 2 x for all real x by continuity; any real number is the limit of a sequence of rational numbers.
@Otto Bretscher – But is it a coincidence that this function, is indeed correct, though I proved it only for integers? If so, how? Doesn't this mean we can extend the proof from here?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
f ( x + y ) = f ( x ) + f ( y ) f ( 1 + x ) = f ( x ) + 2 ⟹ f ( 1 + x ) = f ( x − 1 ) + 2 + 2 Continuing like that, we get f ( 1 + x ) = f ( x − ( x − 1 ) ) + 2 ( x − 1 + 1 ) ⟹ f ( 1 + x ) = f ( 1 ) + 2 ( x ) ⟹ f ( x ) = 2 x So the integral becomes ∫ ( 1 + x 2 ) 2 2 x tan − 1 x d x Putting tan − 1 x = t , we get ∫ 2 t tan t cos 2 x d x = ∫ t sin 2 t d t Which is easy to compute by Integration by parts or using the imaginary part of complex numbers.