Just a couple of polynomials

Algebra Level 3

P P and Q Q are two distinct, non-constant polynomial functions such that ( P Q ) ( x ) = P ( x ) Q ( x ) (P\circ Q)(x) = P(x)Q(x) and P ( 1 ) = P ( 1 ) = 2018. P(1) = P(-1) = 2018.

Find ( Q P ) ( 1 ) . (Q\circ P)(-1).

Note: Function composition ( P Q ) ( x ) (P\circ Q)(x) is sometimes denoted as P ( Q ( x ) ) . P\big(Q(x)\big).


The answer is 4072324.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

5 solutions

Mark Hennings
Feb 13, 2018

If P Q = P Q P\circ Q = PQ , and if P , Q P,Q have degree m , n m,n respectively, then m n = m + n mn = m+n , so that ( m 1 ) ( n 1 ) = 1 (m-1)(n-1) =1 , and hence (since P , Q P,Q are not constant) m = n = 2 m=n=2 . If we write P ( x ) = a x 2 + b x + c P(x) = ax^2 + bx + c , then a Q ( x ) 2 + b Q ( x ) + c = ( P Q ) ( x ) = P ( x ) Q ( x ) aQ(x)^2 + bQ(x) + c \; = \; (P \circ Q)(x) = P(x)Q(x) which implies that c = 0 c=0 , and that a Q ( x ) + b = P ( x ) aQ(x) + b = P(x) . Thus we have P ( x ) = a x 2 + b x Q ( x ) = a x 2 + b x b a P(x) \; = \; ax^2 + bx \hspace{2cm} Q(x) \; = \; \frac{ax^2 + bx - b}{a} for a 0 a \neq 0 , and these polynomials satisfy the conditions, and are distinct, unless a = 1 a=1 and b = 0 b=0 .

Since P ( 1 ) = P ( 1 ) = 2018 P(1) = P(-1) = 2018 , we deduce that a = 2018 a=2018 and b = 0 b=0 , so that P ( x ) = 2018 x 2 P(x) = 2018x^2 and Q ( x ) = x 2 Q(x) = x^2 . Thus ( Q P ) ( 1 ) = Q ( 2018 ) = 201 8 2 = 4072324 (Q \circ P)(-1) = Q(2018) = 2018^2 = \boxed{4072324} .

Thanks for your solution Mark and for reporting a lack of precision in the first draft (namely that P ( 1 ) = 2018 P(1)=2018 could have led to an infinite number of solutions.) Apologies for those who have been misled.

Romain Bouchard - 3 years, 3 months ago

This solution can be simplified: because Q is nonconstant, it has at least one complex zero. Substituting this zero into the given identity yields P(0) = 0, and we can then easily fit a quadratic P to the three points (-1, 2018), (0, 0), and (1, 2018).

Samuel Li - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

You are assuming that if the property holds true on all real numbers x x , it must also hold true for complex x x . This is true for polynomial functions, but not trivial.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years, 3 months ago

When I first solved the problem, the boundary conditions were incorrect, and needed to be cleared up. I therefore solved the equation P Q = P Q P\circ Q=PQ in complete generality, and then had some discussion with Romain to determine which solution was wanted.

Your observation about a zero of Q Q is an alternative way to show that c = 0 c=0 , which was the first important deduction of my proof.

Mark Hennings - 3 years, 3 months ago

Could someone explain the (m-1)(n-1)=1 step. Thanks in advance!

eddie white - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

m n = m + n mn = m + n m n m n = 0 mn - m - n = 0 m n m n + 1 = 1 mn - m - n + 1 = 1 ( m 1 ) ( n 1 ) = 1 (m - 1)(n - 1) = 1 The factors must be whole numbers and non-negative. Leaving ( m 1 ) ( n 1 ) = 1 1 (m-1)(n-1) = 1 \cdot 1 .

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years, 3 months ago

Can we say that P(x) is a linear function as P(-1)=p(1)??

erica phillips - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

No. P ( x ) = x + 2 P(x) = x+2 (for example) but does not satisfy P ( 1 ) = P ( 1 ) P(1) = P(-1) . Since P P is quadratic, we can say that P P has no term in x x (so that b = 0 b=0 ).

Mark Hennings - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

And sir I had another doubt that why is it so that mn=m+n??

erica phillips - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Erica Phillips m n mn is the degree of P Q P\circ Q , while m + n m+n is the degree of P Q PQ .

Mark Hennings - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

@Mark Hennings Thanks sir!!

erica phillips - 3 years, 3 months ago

Couldn’t understand the step “which implies that c = 0”. How did you arrive at that conclusion from the line above it? P(x)Q(x) can have a constant component.

Venkatesh G - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Because on the right side of the equation there is no constant term which means that c=0.

erica phillips - 3 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Is it necessarily true? Since we know the polynomials are quadratic, let P ( x ) = a 1 x 2 + b 1 x + c 1 P(x) = a_1x^2+b_1x+c_1 and Q ( x ) = a 2 x 2 + b 2 x + c 2 Q(x) = a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2 . Multiplying them would result in the constant c 1 c 2 c_1c_2 , which may or may not be zero. I suppose I am missing something here. Could you point me to it?

Venkatesh G - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Venkatesh G Over here when I meant constant on the left side of the equation I meant constants of a polynomial where x=Q(x) hence x^2 term in a polynomial is replaced by (Q(x))^2 and on the other hand there are no coefficients of (Q(x))^2 and the only coefficient of Q(x) is P(x),with no constants finally added to the right side of the equation where x=Q(x) in the standard equation ax^2+bx+c. Hope this helps!!!!!If u have further doubts feel free to ask!!!

erica phillips - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

@Erica Phillips It's not necessarily true. According to your logic, since Q ( x ) 2 Q(x)^2 doesn't have a term on the right-hand side, a a (the coefficient of Q ( x ) 2 Q(x)^2 on the left-hand side) should be zero too. I suppose your method was right but the thought process was a bit off.

Venkatesh G - 2 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

@Venkatesh G Note that a Q ( x ) 2 + b Q ( x ) aQ(x)^2+bQ(x) and P ( x ) Q ( x ) P(x)Q(x) are both multiples of Q ( x ) Q(x) . This means that c c must also be a multiple of Q ( x ) Q(x) . The only way this can happen is when c = 0 c=0 .

Mark Hennings - 2 years, 6 months ago
Arjen Vreugdenhil
Feb 18, 2018

The equation implies that deg P deg Q = deg P + deg Q \deg P \cdot \deg Q = \deg P + \deg Q , with only possible solutions deg P = deg Q = 2 \deg P = \deg Q = 2 . Thus both functions are quadratic.

Since P ( 1 ) = P ( 1 ) P(1) = P(-1) , the function P P must be symmetric about x = 0 x = 0 , hence of the form P ( x ) = a x 2 + b P(x) = ax^2 + b with a + b = 2018 a + b = 2018 . The equation reduces to a Q ( x ) 2 + b = ( a x 2 + b ) Q ( x ) , aQ(x)^2 + b = (ax^2 + b)Q(x), a Q ( x ) + b Q ( x ) = a x 2 + b . aQ(x) + \frac{b}{Q(x)} = ax^2 + b. Since the right side is a polynomial, so is the left side; therefore b = 0 b = 0 . This leaves (after division by a a ) Q ( x ) = x 2 Q(x) = x^2 so that Q ( P ( 1 ) ) = Q ( 2018 ) = 201 8 2 = 4 072 324 . Q(P(-1)) = Q(2018) = 2018^2 = \boxed{4\,072\,324}.

why does b=0? couldn't this be allowed if Q(x) had constant term also?

D E - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Solution has been edited.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years, 3 months ago

Could someone explain why it can draw a conclusion that degP·degQ=degP+degQ?

A Former Brilliant Member - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

If f ( x ) = a n x n + a n 1 x n 1 + + a 0 , g ( x ) = b m x m + b m 1 x m 1 + + b 0 f(x) = a_nx^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + \cdots + a_0,\ \ \ \ \ \ \ g(x) = b_mx^m + b_{m-1}x^{m-1} + \cdots + b_0 then f ( x ) g ( x ) = a n b m x n + m + ( a n b m 1 + a n 1 b m ) x n + m 1 + + a 0 b 0 f(x)\cdot g(x) = a_nb_m x^{n+m} + (a_nb_{m-1} + a_{n-1}b_m) x^{n+m-1} + \cdots + a_0b_0 f ( g ( x ) ) = a n ( b m x m + ) n + + a 0 = a n b m x m n + f(g(x)) = a_n(b_mx^m + \cdots)^n + \cdots + a_0 = a_nb_mx^{m\cdot n} + \cdots Thus the highest powers of x x are x n + m x^{n+m} for f g f\cdot g , and x n m x^{n\cdot m} for f g f \circ g .

Using the "deg" notation, we find deg f = n , deg g = m \deg f = n, \ \ \ \ \ \deg g = m deg ( f g ) = n + m = deg f + deg g , deg ( f g ) = n m = deg f deg g . \deg (f\cdot g) = n + m= \deg f + \deg g, \ \ \ \ \ \deg (f\circ g) = n\cdot m = \deg f \cdot \deg g. Finally, if ( f g ) ( x ) = ( f g ) ( x ) (f\cdot g)(x) = (f \circ g)(x) then deg f + deg g = deg f deg g . \deg f + \deg g = \deg f \cdot \deg g.

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 3 years, 3 months ago

if the right side is a polynomial for x, why does the left side have to be a polynomial for q(x) ?

Donát Herczeg - 3 years, 3 months ago
Ishan Aggarwal
Feb 20, 2018

The other solutions given are more holistic and actually find f(x), but for this particular question that is not reqd and takes 5 secs as the value of f(x) for x=-1 is already given in the question. So Q(P(-1)) = Q(-1)P(-1) = 2018*2018 = 4072324

QED

How did you figure out the value Q ( 1 ) Q(-1) though ?

Romain Bouchard - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

I'd like to understand that also.

Laquita Jackson - 3 years, 3 months ago

This solution requires to demonstrate that P(Q(x))=Q(P(x)).

Franck Martin - 3 years, 3 months ago

The value of Q ( 1 ) Q(-1) is not given explicitly in the question.

Mark Hennings - 3 years, 3 months ago

As you can see from the 'holistic' solutions, Q(x) = x^2 so Q(-1) = 1, not 2018. You have assumed Q(P(x)) = P(Q(x)) too. In this case, however, two wrongs do make a right.

Richard Farrer - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Why Not Q(x)=-x And P(x)=2018x2 so the answer is2018

Endale Yadete - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

L=P(Q(x))=2018x^2 R=P(x)Q(x)=-2018x^3 L is not equal to R which violates the given condition

Aman Kumar - 3 years, 3 months ago

I’m glad that you are good at guessing, but you did not solve the problem. You misread it.

massimo 22 - 3 years, 3 months ago

Wow, 5 upvotes. This is completely wrong.

Denis Husadzic - 3 years, 3 months ago

What subject (in math) would I have to study in order to learn how to do problems such as these?

Damon Miller - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

I guess linear algebra and more specifically polynomials.

Romain Bouchard - 3 years, 3 months ago
James Bartlett
Feb 25, 2018

In time-limited competition contexts, sometimes it is worth assuming that the question has an answer. It isn't quite as satisfying, since you are building an argument conditional on an unproven premise. It can unlock questions quickly, though, as follows:

If Q ( P ( 1 ) Q(P(-1) has a value, then any P ( x ) P(x) and Q ( x ) Q(x) that meet the criteria should do the trick.

P ( x ) = 2018 x 2 P(x) = 2018x^{2} and Q ( x ) = x 2 Q(x) = x^{2} meet the criteria, since P ( 1 ) = P ( 1 ) = 2018 P(-1) = P(1) = 2018 and P ( Q ( x ) ) = 2018 x 4 = 2018 x 2 × x 2 P(Q(x)) = 2018x^{4} = 2018x^{2} \times x^{2} .

Using these, Q ( P ( 1 ) ) = Q ( 2018 ) = 201 8 2 = 4072324 Q(P(-1)) = Q(2018) = 2018^{2} = 4072324

**PοQ(x)=P(x)×Q(x)----(1)

let Q(x)=1

P(1)=P(x)

P(x)=2018

∵P(±1)=2018

By comparison,

∴x=±1

Substitute x=±1 ,Q(x)=1 into (1)

P(1)=P(1)×Q(±1)

Q(±1)=1

∴Q(x)=x^n (n must be even number)

degPοQ=degP+degQ

degP×degQ=degP+degQ

∴The answer is degP=degQ=2

∴function P and Q is quadratic function

∴Q(x)=x^{2}

QοP(-1)=Q(2018)

           =2018^{2}

           =4072324**

Your arguments are not rigourous - or always accurate - here. With a little re-arrangement, you can prove that if there is an x such that Q(x) = 1 then x=±1 but you then assume that Q(-1) = 1 and Q(1) = 1, when all you have proved is that one or other is the case. Even if Q(±1)=1 is true (which turns out to be the case), your next assumption is wrong since, for example, Q(x) = ax^2 + 1 - a also satisfies the condition.

Richard Farrer - 3 years, 3 months ago

We prove that the vale of q(x)=ax2+bx+c and p(x)=a1x2+b1x+C1 So The Vale Of aa1=0 c1=0 b=0 c=0 and the value of b1=-1

Endale Yadete - 3 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

prove by varible or root not by no show me

Endale Yadete - 3 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...