x y + y z + z x
If x , y , z are positive real numbers and x y z = 2 0 1 7 , which of the given options is not a possible value of above expression?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
This solution is incomplete. Do you see why?
Log in to reply
The solution shows what the minimum of the expression can be. It does not give any info about its maximum.
Log in to reply
Precisely! In particular, it does not explain that the rest of the numbers can be achieved.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – But I am not able to find any maxima for this. Can you help me out? Is it ∞ ?
Log in to reply
@Tapas Mazumdar – Same, I am too having difficulty to find it out.
Log in to reply
@Md Zuhair – Can you achieve (approximately) 2 0 1 7 2 ? 2 0 1 7 3 ? How can we show that "all large enough values can be achieved"?
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – This is what I have in my mind. Since there is no restriction on distinct values for the variables we can fix x = y , now we see that
x 2 z = 2 0 1 7 ⟹ z = x 2 2 0 1 7
Letting x → 0 gives z → ∞ and so the expression
x y + y z + z x = 2 0 1 7 ( x 1 + y 1 + z 1 ) = 2 0 1 7 ( x 2 + z 1 )
which also tends to ∞ as x → 0 and z → ∞ .
Log in to reply
@Tapas Mazumdar – Great! So now we've established that any number that is "large enough" can be achieved.
How much is "large enough" though? IE can every number between 478 and "large enough" be achieved?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
By AM-GM Inequality
We have,
3 x y + y z + z x ≥ 3 x 2 y 2 z 2
x y + y z + z x ≥ 3 3 x 2 y 2 z 2
Now x y z = 2 0 1 7
So putting the value,
We get
x y + y z + z x ≥ 3 3 x 2 y 2 z 2 ⟹ x y + y z + z x ≥ 4 7 8 . 9 1 5
So x y + y z + z x ≥ 4 7 8 . 9 1 5
So 4 7 8 is not possible answer.