Please correct the 3rd statement as: Limit will oscillate b/w 0 and 2.
Note: I have said nothing about 3rd statement. It may be wrong or it may be right.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
You should rewrite the limit in statement 4 as L = lim x → ∞ 1 − x sin x since statement 5 means can be taken as either L = 1 or lim x → ∞ x sin x = 1 .
Log in to reply
In response to Jake Lai:
I am not able to understand your problem correctly. Please elaborate it.
What I understood is that you have problem in evaluating the below mentioned limit.
lim x->(infinity) sin(x)/(x) becomes 0 not 1.
Log in to reply
Couldn't it be 1, like if you put x as 1/t in which t goes to zero 0, so that when you put lim t->0 you get sin(1/t)/1/t = 1?
Log in to reply
@Haries Ajrun – Since sin(x) will oscillate between -1 and 1 and in denominator we are tending to infinity. So limit will be 0.
Regarding your doubt, lim x->(zero) sin(x)/(x) = 1 . It is correct but it is only true for cases when argument of sin and denominator both tend to zero. This result fails even if they tend to a non zero number. And here, they are tending to infinity,so this result is not valid here.
Reply if you want a proof why it is only true for cases where argument of sin and denominator both tend to zero.
Note: Here you can't apply L'Hospital rule because numerator will oscillate b/w -1 and 1 and denominator is tending to infinity. No (zero)/(zero) form, so no L'Hospital.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
L'Hospital rule states that if lim(x->a) f(x)/g(x) attains indeterminate form, then lim(x->a) f(x)/g(x) = lim(x->a) f'(x)/g'(x) if and only if R.H.S. exists.
Here existence means that it can yield finite as well as infinite value.
Recursion of L'Hospital is only valid when lim(x->a) f'(x)/g'(x) is also an indeterminate form.
Now coming to question. After applying L'Hospital Rule, we get (1-cos(x)) , when x->(infinity), we don't know the behaviour of cos(x) as x tends to infinity. So, we can't conclude anything about the RHS i.e(1-cos(x)) , so we can't evaluate this limit using L'Hospital Rule.
Hence, L'Hospital Rule is not applicable here.