Given that there are three prime factors to the following expression and the smallest prime factor is the only prime factor which is a 2 -digit number. Determine the smallest prime factor of
1 + 2 2 1 + 4 2 1
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
@Finn Hulse , any idea?
Log in to reply
Yes! I let x = 2 2 1 and y = 1 and factored. I'm sure there's a better way to do it, but I pretty much just tried to find ways of manipulating the variables to allow for factorization. Yes, I did have to resort to Newton's Sums, but I got lucky. :D
Log in to reply
FYI, this problem was actually from an International Mathematics Competition and no participants (except SOME but that's a long story) can solve this.
Log in to reply
@Christopher Boo – Woah. Hey, congrats on making the "Who to follow" page! I was kind of disappointed about not making it, but whatever.
@Finn Hulse OMG! I did the same thing. Just when I thought I would write a comment here, you were ahead of me!
Per your instructions, I used the same method.
the expression can be expressed as
2
6
3
-1 /
2
2
1
-1.
2
9
-1 is a factor of
2
6
3
-1 but not
2
2
1
-1 (
2
n
-1 is a factor of
2
a
n
-1).
2
9
-1= 511 = 7(73).
7=
2
3
-1 is a factor of
2
2
1
-1 however, hence 73 is not a factor.
hence after division 73 is a factor of the expression.
I did it in the same way.
yeah....me too
that's a pretty good method i must say :)
This is not an infallible or efficient method for finding such prime factors, but this one worked for me. Let
a
=
2
3
so that we have
1
+
a
7
+
a
1
4
. We note that
1
+
a
+
a
2
=
7
3
, a prime number, so we hope that
1
+
a
+
a
2
divides into
1
+
a
7
+
a
1
4
. After some foodling around, we see that it does, i..e
(
1
+
a
+
a
2
)
(
(
1
+
a
3
+
a
6
+
a
9
+
a
1
2
)
−
(
a
+
a
4
+
a
8
+
a
1
1
)
)
=
(
1
+
a
7
+
a
1
4
)
.
And so, I entered "73" as the solution to see what happens.
It's one thing to take a stab at a solution, quite another to prove beyond a doubt that it is indeed the correct one.
You don't have to try real hard to find out if an expression is divisible by a 2 + a + 1 . Here's a cool trick.
Let 1 + a 7 + a 1 4 be equal to f ( a ) . Notice that f ( ω ) and f ( ω 2 ) are both equal to zero [ ω and ω 2 are the cubic roots of 1 that have non-zero imaginary part]. That means,
f ( a ) = g ( a ) ( a − ω ) ( a − ω 2 ) = g ( a ) ( a 2 + a + 1 ) .
Log in to reply
Not all 1 + a n + a 2 n is divisible by 1 + a + a 2 , so I don't quite understand how to determine which integer n it is, using your method. But the subject of factorizing 1 + a n + a 2 n is an interesting one, and not as straightforward as factorizing 1 + a n , possible only for odd n.
Log in to reply
Mursalin's idea is to use the Remainder Factor Theorem.
Observe that ( x − ω ) ( x − ω 2 ) = x 2 + x + 1 . Consider f n ( x ) = x 2 n + x n + 1 . Suppose that x 2 + x + 1 ∣ f n ( x ) , then this means that f n ( x ) = ( x − ω ) ( x − ω 2 ) g n ( k ) , hence f n ( ω ) = 0 , f ( ω 2 ) = 0 .
Checking f n ( ω ) = ω 2 n + ω n + 1 , this value is 0 n ≡ 1 , 2 ( m o d 3 ) and is equal to 3 if n ≡ 0 ( m o d 3 ) . The same holds for f n ( ω 2 ) . Hence, f n ( x ) is divisible by x 2 + x + 1 if and only if n is not a multiple of 3.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – In this vein, then, given that the problem states there is one prime factor with just 2 digits, wouldn't this be an easier way to solve the problem? I think Boo made the problem easier by saying that one of the prime factors is just 2 digits long. We could quickly rule out the single digit prime factors 2, 3, 5, 7.
Log in to reply
@Michael Mendrin – Yes. I believe this approach (or something similar), is what the competition organizers were expecting. The facts given in the question are hard to know, and the problem would be hard to solve without them.
The number is 2 2 1 − 1 2 6 3 − 1 . Since x n − 1 = ∏ d ∣ n Φ d ( x ) where Φ d is the d th cyclotomic polynomial, we get that the number is Φ 9 ( 2 ) Φ 6 3 ( 2 ) .
Now Φ 9 ( x ) = x 6 + x 3 + 1 , so Φ 9 ( 2 ) = 7 3 . The stipulations of the problem allow us to stop there and be done.
the following expression 1 + 2^21 + 4^21 can be restated as:
1^3 + (2^3)^7 + (4^3)^7 which is divisible by (1^3 + 2^3 + 4^3 = 73)
thus, the answer is 73
Since n = 1 + 2 2 1 + 4 2 1 is a number of the form x 2 + x + 1 , − 3 is a quadratic residue for every prime divisor of n , hence all the prime divisors of n are numbers of the form 3 k + 1 , and we have only to check divisibility by the elements of the following set: { 1 3 , 1 9 , 3 1 , 3 7 , 4 3 , 6 1 , 6 7 , 7 3 , 7 9 , 9 7 } . We notice that p ∣ n implies p ∣ x 3 − 1 = 2 6 3 − 1 , or 2 6 3 ≡ 1 ( m o d p ) . We rule out 1 3 since 2 6 3 ≡ 2 3 ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 3 ) ; we rule out 1 9 since 2 6 3 − 1 ≡ 2 9 − 1 ≡ 1 ( m o d 1 9 ) and so on, till 7 3 . The order of 2 mod 7 3 is just 9 , so n ≡ 1 + 2 3 + 2 6 ≡ 0 ( m o d 7 3 ) .
Let Φ n ( x ) denote the n th cyclotomic polynomial.
Then number in question is Φ 3 ( 2 2 1 ) = Φ 9 ( 2 7 ) = Φ 9 ( 2 ) Φ 6 3 ( 2 ) .
Thus, Φ 9 ( 2 ) = 2 6 + 2 3 + 1 = 7 3 is a prime divisor. Since it has two digits, we're done.
I used Mersenne numbers as my guide. Others below used the same idea if not the name. The number given is equivalent to M63 / M21. M63 is divisible by both M7 and M9. M21 is divisible by both M7 and M3. So the number M9 / M3 should divide evenly into M63 / M21. M9 / M3 = 2^6 + 2 ^3 +1 = 73. So 73 is a factor of the original number given.
I know this isn't a solution or a hint, but what I did was factorized (difference of 2 cubes), then got one expression over another. That should get you somewhere...
I'm not sure if this can lead us to the solution, can you explain more?
Log in to reply
Sorry, I really don't know, I was just throwing in an idea (possible one).
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The expression can be rewrite as
1 2 1 + 2 2 1 + 4 2 1
We use Vieta's Formula to construct a new equation with roots p , q , r where p = 1 3 , q = 2 3 , r = 4 3 , we will have
x 3 + 7 3 x 2 + 5 8 4 x + 5 1 2 = 0
Similarly, we need to find the smallest prime factor of
P 7 = p 7 + q 7 + r 7
By Newton's Sum ,
P 1 − 7 3 = 0
P 2 − 7 3 P 1 + 1 1 6 8 = 0
P 3 − 7 3 P 2 + 5 8 4 P 1 − 1 5 3 6 = 0
P 4 − 7 3 P 3 + 5 8 4 P 2 − 5 1 2 P 1 = 0
P 5 − 7 3 P 4 + 5 8 4 P 3 − 5 1 2 P 2 = 0
P 6 − 7 3 P 5 + 5 8 4 P 4 − 5 1 2 P 3 = 0
P 7 − 7 3 P 6 + 5 8 4 P 5 − 5 1 2 P 4 = 0
From the last equation, we know that − 7 3 P 6 and 5 8 4 P 5 are both divisible by 7 3 . The only left to investigate is 5 1 2 P 4 .
From the forth and first equation, which states that P 1 is divisible by 7 3 , we know that P 4 is divisible by 7 3 .
Conclude everything above, we get that P 7 is divisible by 7 3 .