This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Okay. I get my mistake. Actually, I forgot to consider LHR and RHR individually, I just checked that the condition was a ∞ / ∞ and applied L’H o ^ pital’s rule to find the limit. Will update the problem soon.
Log in to reply
@Tapas Mazumdar Had it been only limit x tends to 0 , won't the answer still be same as the left part is not in domain , so we don't consider it and evaluate the limit according to the right hand side only?
Log in to reply
Surely x < 0 is not part of the domain of the given function yet when we talk about evaluating limits (without stating from the left or right) like just 'x tends to some real number a' , we have to evaluate limits from both sides. So even in such cases, like the problem above, although negative real values of x are not part of the domain of the function and the function, as well as its limit, is undefined for x < 0 , the resulting conclusion one would arrive at is that the whole of the limit does not exist.
Log in to reply
@Tapas Mazumdar – Can you please cite the source of your argument, because our teacher has taught that in case of evaluating limit at the endpoint of domain, the limit is evaluated only from the side which is in domain and the limit is equal to that side's limiting value. So in this case x → 0 lim f ( x ) = x → 0 + lim f ( x )
I think you are right @Ankit Kumar Jain because at the endpoint of domain of a function the limit is evaluated only from the side which is in the domain.
It's still a good question though. It tricked my pants off. giggles
L' Hospital is the last weapon but i often answer without using it and my answer is wrong.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The answer to the unedited question by taking the two-sided limit should be that the limit does not exist.
Checking the left-hand and the right-hand limits, the left-hand limit does not exist for lim x → 0 ln ( sin x ) while the right-hand limit is − ∞ . But I would still clarify this with all of you first.
However, the answer will be zero if x → 0 + . For the sake of clarification, it means "x approaches zero from the right".
For the solution, let us rewrite the original limit into the indeterminate form in which we can work with L'hopital's Rule .
L = lim x → 0 + ln ( sin x ) tan x
= lim x → 0 + tan x ln ( sin x )
= lim x → 0 + tan x 1 ln ( sin x )
= lim x → 0 + cot x ln ( sin x )
As x → 0 + , ln ( sin x ) → − ∞ and cot x → ∞ . Hence, we have the indeterminate form of ∞ / ∞ .
Applying L'hopital's Rule, differentiating the numerator and denominator individually, we get the following:
= lim x → 0 + − csc x cot x cot x
= − lim x → 0 + sin x
= 0