Find the minimum of
[ cos 2 t ( sin t + 2 ) 2 + ( sin t + 2 ) 2 3 cos 2 t ] 2 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Flipping the order of your paragraphs would help to motivate the approach taken. Otherwise, "find the minimum of the first summand" is bad form for problems where we want to find the minimum of the expression.
Nice! I chose the substitution x = cos ( t ) sin ( t ) + 2 , so that
f ( x ( t ) ) = x 2 + x 2 3 ⟹ d t d f = d x d f d t d x = 2 x ( 1 − x 4 3 ) ( cos 2 ( t ) 1 + 2 sin ( t ) ) .
Now x = 0 since sin ( t ) + 2 > 0 for all real t , so the critical points occur when
1 + 2 sin ( t ) = 0 ⟹ sin ( t ) = − 2 1 , corresponding to a value for f of 4 , and
x 2 = 3 ⟹ ( sin ( t ) + 2 ) 2 = 3 cos 2 ( t ) ⟹ sin 2 ( t ) + 4 sin ( t ) + 4 = 3 ( 1 − sin 2 ( t ) )
⟹ ( 1 + 3 ) sin 2 ( t ) + 4 sin ( t ) + ( 4 − 3 ) = 0 ,
which has no real roots as the discriminant b 2 − 4 a c = 1 2 − 1 2 3 < 0 .
As f ( t ) > 0 for all real t and f ( t ) → ∞ as cos ( t ) → 0 any critical points we found above will correspond to (local) minima, we can conclude that the global minimum of f is indeed 4 .
Log in to reply
Thank you for taking an interest in my silly little problem, Brian! I don't understand the step where you go from x 2 = 3 to sin t + 2 = 3 cos t .
Log in to reply
Whoops, sorry! It should have been ( sin ( t ) + 2 ) 2 = 3 cos 2 ( t ) , which yields no real solutions anyway.
I wonder how many of your students just forged ahead with taking the derivative without any helpful substitution? That direct approach would have ended up with a messy equation to solve.
Log in to reply
@Brian Charlesworth – Let me admit that I did suggest a substitution to my students... we are leaning the chain rule in my Calc I class.
Liked you solution a lot and got my answer right but ended up writing 4,5,6 (did not saw m 2 :-) ), please try this
I applied A.M.-G.M. inequality and got the answer as 12.Can you please tell me where I am making the mistake?
Log in to reply
The lower bound of 1 2 is not attained since you cannot make the two terms equal . In general, AM-GM does not give you a minimum but merely a lower bound... you need to check whether the value is attained.
Instead of AM-GM inequality try using weighted means inequality.
The range of cos 2 t ( sin t + 2 ) 2 is [ 3 , ∞ ) , so the value of 12, which is achieved when cos 2 t ( sin t + 2 ) 2 = 3 , is impossible.
How do you say that minimum value of u + u 3 happens at minimum value of u?
Fun weekend problem, Otto! Thanks for publishing.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
In a first step, let's find the minimum p of the first summand, cos 2 t ( sin t + 2 ) 2 . Taking the derivative, cos 3 t 2 ( sin t + 2 ) ( 2 sin t + 1 ) , we see that the minimum is attained when sin t = − 1 / 2 , so that p = 3 / 4 ( 3 / 2 ) 2 = 3 .
Making the substitution u = cos 2 t ( sin t + 2 ) 2 , we can write the given function f as u + u 3 ; this function is increasing for u > 3 . Since the minimal value of u is 3, the minimal value of u + u 3 is m = 3 + 3 3 = 4 , so that m 2 = 1 6 .