n → ∞ lim n 3 1 2 + 2 2 + 3 2 + ⋯ + n 2 = ?
Give your answer to 3 decimal places.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
S O L U T I O N
n − > ∞ lim n 3 1 2 + 2 2 + 3 2 + ⋯ + n 2
⟹ n − > ∞ lim 6 n 3 n ( n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 )
⟹ n − > ∞ lim 6 n 3 n 3 ( 1 + n 1 ) ( 2 + n 1 )
⟹ n − > ∞ lim 6 ( 1 + n 1 ) ( 2 + n 1 )
⟹ 6 ( 1 ) × ( 2 )
⟹ 6 2
⟹ 3 1 = 0 . 3 3 3
Just key in "\ to" or "\ rightarrow" for → or →
Log in to reply
Thanks sir, But can you help me to show the division by slash?
Log in to reply
Can you install Daum Equation Editor and use it?
"\ div" ÷ .
Log in to reply
@Chew-Seong Cheong – No sir not like this... say n 2 n 3 can be divided and answer will be n. Now what happened is n^3 was cutted by n^2.. this cutting is what I want to show sir
Log in to reply
@Md Zuhair – n 2 n 3 1 . Just toggle LaTex or put your mouse cursor to see codes.
Log in to reply
@Chew-Seong Cheong – Very very thank you sir
Log in to reply
@Md Zuhair – I have changed it. The later one is better.
Similar solution with @Naren Bhandari's
L = n → ∞ lim n 3 1 2 + 2 2 + 3 2 + ⋯ + n 2 = n → ∞ lim n 1 k = 1 ∑ n ( n k ) 2 = ∫ 0 1 x 2 d x = 3 x 3 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ 0 1 = 3 1 ≈ 0 . 3 3 3 Using Riemann sums:
Nice solution but there is a problem in your note about Riemann sums:
- k = a ∑ b : a and b aren't necessarily integers, the sum goes for example from 0 to n .
-in the sum it is f ( a + k n b − a )
-it is ∫ a b f ( x ) d x without limit and bounds depending of n .
-finally, it not n 1 in front of the sum but n b − a .
I know it is an inattention...
= n → ∞ lim n 3 ∑ k = 1 n k 2 = n → ∞ lim n 3 3 n 3 + 2 n 2 + 6 n = n → ∞ lim n 2 3 n 2 + 2 n + 6 1 = n → ∞ lim ( 3 1 + 2 n 1 + 6 n 2 1 ) = 3 1 + n → ∞ lim ( 2 n 1 + 6 n 2 1 ) Because n → ∞ lim 2 n = ∞ and n → ∞ lim 6 n 2 = ∞ , the new limit becomes n → ∞ lim ( 2 n 1 + 6 n 2 1 ) = n → ∞ lim ( ∞ 1 + ∞ 1 ) = 0 . With this, we arrive at our solution: = 3 1 = 0 . 3 3 3 …
Relevant wiki: Stolz–Cesàro theorem
L = n → ∞ lim n 3 1 2 + 2 2 + 3 2 + ⋯ + n 2 = n → ∞ lim ( n + 1 ) 3 − n 3 ( n + 1 ) 2 = n → ∞ lim 3 n 2 + 3 n + 1 n 2 + 2 n + 1 = n → ∞ lim 3 + n 3 + n 2 1 1 + n 2 + n 2 1 = 3 1 ≈ 0 . 3 3 3 By Stolz-Ces a ˋ ro theorem
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
L = n → ∞ lim n 3 1 2 + 2 2 + 3 2 + ⋯ + n 2 = n → ∞ lim k = 1 ∑ n n 3 k 2 = n → ∞ lim n 1 k = 1 ∑ n n 2 k 2 = ∫ 0 1 x 2 d x c c c c c c c By Riemann Sums = 3 1 = 0 . 3 3 3