Let x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , . . . x n be real numbers such that x 1 > x 2 > x 3 . . . . > x n .
Also x 1 = tan − 1 2 and sin ( x n + 1 − x n ) + 2 n + 1 1 sin ( x n ) sin ( x n + 1 ) = 0 .
Let I = lim n → ∞ cot x n
Evaluate [ I ] .
Note : [ ] represents the greatest integer function.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
This problem actually came in my AITS examination..
Log in to reply
Oh. didn't know that. This one came in my test too.
Does the paper contain more questions like this? I would definitely like to try them. If it is ok for you, can you tell me which AITS you are talking about?
Thanks! :)
Log in to reply
I am studying at IITian's PACE, so this is from the AITS-7 Mains examination of PACE coaching institute.
Actually this was the only problem that bothered me at the time of the exam, the other problems were quite easy (well, too easy for a brilliant mind as you)
I secured an All India Rank of 69 in that examination (well, I've had better days.)
Log in to reply
@Anish Puthuraya – Thanks Anish! And that's a pretty good score in my opinion, keep it up. :)
Btw, if you have time, can you post a solution to this: Definite Integral . I am looking for alternative approaches to this problem. :)
Best of luck with your boards!
Log in to reply
@Pranav Arora – No, I solved it by using the same method..But, Ill try and figure out an alternative.
Best of luck to you as well!
yeah, i remember this one
yes, i agree that I = 1-(1/2)^n and hence when limit n tends to infinity I = 1 but you r question asks for [I] which greatest integer function. hence no matter how big may 'n' be it is actually be going to be less than 1 always hence the answer should be zero... and not 1
Mistaken sorry
Don't you think greatest integer function would give 0 as the answer?
vijay the answer you have given is wrong as 0.5+0.25+0.125+... will approach 1 from below and the integer part of I will be 0
The limit is exactly equal to 1 . The integer part of it too will equal one.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Given that
sin ( x n + 1 − x n ) = 2 n + 1 − 1 sin ( x n ) s i n ( x n + 1 )
Which gives us:
cot ( x n + 1 ) − cot ( x n ) = 2 n + 1 1
This series telescopes :
cot ( x 2 ) − cot ( x 1 ) = 2 2 1
cot ( x 3 ) − cot ( x 2 ) = 2 3 1
.....
cot ( x n + 1 ) − cot ( x n ) = 2 n + 1 1
Also, we have x 1 = tan − 1 2 ⟹ c o t x 1 = 2 1
We have
cot ( x n + 1 ) = 2 1 + 2 2 1 + 2 3 1 + 2 4 1 . . . + 2 n + 1 1
⟹ cot ( x n ) = 2 1 + 2 2 1 + 2 3 1 + 2 4 1 . . . + 2 n 1
cot ( x n ) = 1 − 2 1 2 1 ( 1 − 2 n 1 ) = 1 − 2 n 1
I = lim n → ∞ cot ( x n ) = 1