x → ∞ lim x 2 l ≤ x ∑ l ⌊ l x ⌋
Find the closed form of the above limit to 3 decimal places.
Notation:
⌊
⋅
⌋
denotes the
floor function
.
Bonus: Can you find a general formula for x → ∞ lim x n + 1 ∑ l ≤ x l n ⌊ l x ⌋ for n ≥ 1 ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Is 1/1²+1/2²+1/3²+1/4²+...=π²/6 a riemann sum? I use this to approach the answer.
Log in to reply
To clarify, are you talking about riemann zeta function or riemann integral sum? Because the sum you provided is ζ ( 2 ) , where ζ ( x ) is riemann zeta function.
Log in to reply
True, but he is using a Riemann sum trick to convert the limit of the original sum into an integral. A Riemann sum is used to obtain an integral which can be evaluated in terms of the Riemann zeta function - a case of Riemann squared!
Oh okay, I saw that, maybe I should first learn riemann sum before this. Haha. Thanks.
ans is 0.822
Relevant wiki: Interchanging the summation and integral sign
We have ℓ ≤ x ∑ ℓ k ⌊ ℓ x ⌋ = ℓ ≤ x ∑ m ≤ ℓ x ∑ ℓ k = m ℓ ≤ x ∑ ℓ k = n ≤ x ∑ ℓ ∣ n ∑ ℓ k = n ≤ x ∑ σ k ( n ) = n ≤ x ∑ d ∣ n ∑ ( d n ) k = d ≤ x ∑ m ≤ d x ∑ m k If k ≥ 2 then m ≤ d x ∑ m k = k + 1 1 ( d x ) k + 1 + O ( ( d x ) k ) x → ∞ while d ≤ x ∑ d k + 1 1 = ζ ( k + 1 ) + O ( x − k ) x → ∞ which tells us that ℓ ≤ x ∑ ℓ k ⌊ ℓ x ⌋ = k + 1 1 ζ ( k + 1 ) x k + 1 + O ( x k ) x → ∞ and hence x → ∞ lim x − k − 1 ℓ ≤ x ∑ ℓ k ⌊ ℓ x ⌋ = k + 1 1 ζ ( k + 1 ) The case k = 1 is slightly more delicate. We still have m ≤ d x ∑ m = 2 1 ( d x ) 2 + O ( d x ) x → ∞ while d ≤ x ∑ d 2 1 = ζ ( 2 ) + O ( x − 1 ) x → ∞ which tells us that ℓ ≤ x ∑ ℓ ⌊ ℓ x ⌋ = 2 1 ζ ( 2 ) x 2 + O ( x ln x ) x → ∞ and hence x → ∞ lim x − 2 ℓ ≤ x ∑ ℓ ⌊ ℓ x ⌋ = 2 1 ζ ( 2 ) making the answer 1 2 1 π 2 = 0 . 8 2 2 4 6 7 0 3 3 4 .
Amazing!!, Can you tell me the name of this subject or maybe a book about this?, it looks very interesting!! I would like to study these advance topics.
Log in to reply
You need to look at a book on Elementary Number Theory, that handles topics properties of multiplicative functions and the Dirichlet convolution. Any introductory book on the topic should get you started.
Log in to reply
Thank you very much!! I will search those topics!!
Log in to reply
@Carlos Andrés Betancourt Baca – If you want to know what directly inspired this problem, you should search Dirichlet's hyperbola method. For a short introduction and example, you can take a look at http://planetmath.org/sites/default/files/texpdf/37990.pdf .
Log in to reply
@Nicolas Nagel – Thank you!! I am reading this article and looks really interesting.
I could able to solve this problem before I learn Riemann sum, but can't solve the bonus problem anyway.
This isn't a fast method but a much primitive method.
First, I test x = 1 0 to clarify what is the problem want for.
Let f ( l ) = l ⌊ l x ⌋
l f ( l ) 1 1 0 2 1 0 3 9 4 8 5 1 0 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 1 0 1 0
Then I saw the pattern,
When 2 x < l ≤ x , f ( l ) = l
then 3 x < l ≤ 2 x , f ( l ) = 2 l and so on.
Generalize that, I get a + 1 x < l ≤ a x , f ( l ) = a l
So I draw a graph which satisfied this, because x tend to ∞ so the integer result (which made by floor function) will look like linear result.
(This is a example graph for x = 1 0 0 for some a . For x-axis represent l and y-axis represent f ( l ) )
So I need to calculate the total area under the trapeziums .
Let the area made by a + 1 x < l ≤ a x be P a
The area P a is equivalent as A.M. sequence which the first term is f ( a + 1 x ) = a + 1 a x , last term is f ( a x ) = x and the number of terms is a x − a + 1 x = a ( a + 1 ) x
You may see which this represented, A.M. Sum, is equal to trapezium area formula 2 1 h ( a + b ) , Math is beautiful!
P a = 2 a ( a + 1 ) x ( x + a + 1 a x ) = 2 a ( a + 1 ) 2 2 a + 1 x 2
After some partition of fraction,
P a = x 2 [ 2 a 1 − 2 ( a + 1 ) 1 + 2 ( a + 1 ) 2 1 ]
As what the question ask for,
l i m x → ∞ x 2 l ≤ x ∑ l ⌊ l x ⌋ = l i m x → ∞ x 2 a = 1 ∑ ∞ P a = a = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 a 1 − 2 ( a + 1 ) 1 + 2 ( a + 1 ) 2 1
It's too long, the partition of fraction will be
a = 1 ∑ ∞ [ 2 a 1 − 2 ( a + 1 ) 1 ] + a = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 ( a + 1 ) 2 1 = = = [ 2 1 − 4 1 + 4 1 − 6 1 + 6 1 − 8 1 + … ] + 2 1 [ 2 2 1 + 3 2 1 + 4 2 1 + … ] 2 1 + 2 1 [ 6 π 2 − 1 ] 1 2 π 2
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Riemann Sums
We can use Riemann sum to solve this problem. We have x → ∞ lim x n + 1 ∑ l ⩽ x l n ⌊ l x ⌋ = = = = = x → ∞ lim x 1 l ⩽ x ∑ x n l n ⌊ l x ⌋ ∫ 0 1 u n ⌊ u 1 ⌋ d u k = 1 ∑ ∞ ∫ k + 1 1 k 1 k u n d u k = 1 ∑ ∞ k [ n + 1 u n + 1 ] k + 1 1 k 1 n + 1 1 ζ ( n + 1 ) . Substituting n = 1 , the limit tends to 1 2 π 2 .