x → ∞ lim ( x 2 + 4 x + 1 − x ) = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I used the same method
x → ∞ lim x 2 + 4 x + 1 − x = x → ∞ lim ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 − x = = x → ∞ lim ( x + 2 ) 2 − x = x → ∞ lim ( x + 2 ) − x = 2
Where did the -3 go
Log in to reply
When x becomes unboundedly large, ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 ≈ ( x + 2 ) 2 .
Log in to reply
That is a very dangerous statement to say. It could be interpreted to imply that
x → ∞ lim ( x + 2 ) 3 − 3 − x 2 − 4 x ≈ x → ∞ lim ( x + 2 ) 3 − x 2 − 4 x ?
What is the mathematically rigorous statement that you intended to communicate?
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Oh right, it should be when x → ∞ , the ratio ( x + 2 ) 2 ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 → 1 .
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Not quite.
lim g ( x ) f ( x ) = 1 ⇒ lim f ( x ) − g ( x ) = 0 .
You seem to want to claim that
lim g ( x ) f ( x ) = 1 ⇒ lim f ( x ) − h ( x ) = lim g ( x ) − h ( x ) .
Do you think that is true?
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – Oh dang it. I bookmarked this page but I forgot to reply. Well, basically, I should add a square root sign to become: ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 → x + 2 .
Thanks. It's always very tricky when dealing with infinities. I should be more careful next time~~
@Calvin Lin – Don't you think in this case it is ok to do so? The largest degree will be x^3 anyway so chuck the 3. Can always make the russel paradox shit happen. Also i had a question. In Limit x tends to ∞ ((x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4))^(1/4)-x can we use A.M. G.M. as all the multiplicating terms are linear and hence the infinities will be similar sowe use the A.M. as it is an upper bound.
Log in to reply
same method!
I think the equation you deduced is wrong
Log in to reply
why?his solution contains no errors.although he approximated it,it's justified in this problem since the values approach infinity
Log in to reply
The solution currently contains an unjustified statement. In particular, he does have to prove that lim x → ∞ ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 − ( x + 2 ) = 0 .
Note that if lim f ( x ) = ∞ and lim g ( x ) = ∞ , it does not imply that lim f ( x ) − g ( x ) = 0 . Hence, it does not follow immediately from "values approach infinity".
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – the derivative of the square root function gets infinitesimal as x approaches infinity
@Calvin Lin – what i meant was that lim x → ∞ ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 ≈ x + 2
Log in to reply
@Hamza A – The idea about derivatives is one way to prove my statement about the limits
Note that your limit equation doesn't make sense. The LHS is actually independent of x , which is a dummy variable.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – can you please elaborate on the limit part?how does it not make sense?
Log in to reply
@Hamza A – What you meant to say is that
x → ∞ lim ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 − ( x + 2 ) = 0
The reason why it doesn't your statement make sense, is because x is a dummy variable when used in the limit, and could be replaced with anything. In particular,
x → ∞ lim ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 = N → ∞ lim ( N + 2 ) 2 − 3
Now, why would the RHS be (approximately) equal to x + 2 ?
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – because the derivative of the function ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 is never equal to zero(in the function's domain,x can be -2 but that will result in a negative number inside the square root) because the derivative is ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 x + 2 ,it will get really close though,but the difference is still there,as x gets larger,the value of the derivative at that point(with the same x value) will get smaller and will approach 0 but never quite reach it
Log in to reply
@Hamza A – I am not talking about the justification. As I said,
The idea about derivatives is one way to prove my statement about the limits.
Let me express the error that you have in another way.
Are the following statement true or false:
1. lim N → ∞ ( N + 2 ) 2 − 3 = x + 2 .
2. lim x → ∞ ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 = lim N → ∞ ( N + 2 ) 2 − 3 .
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – hmm,the first is true when x=N
the second is always right
Log in to reply
@Hamza A – The first is not true. There is no "x" in the LHS, how can there be an "x" in the RHS?
The second statement is right, the first statement is wrong. And that is why it is not true that
x → ∞ lim ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 ≈ x + 2 .
That's all I'm saying about this.
Log in to reply
@Calvin Lin – oh,i get it,i over-complicated that for no reason :)
@Calvin Lin – I can prove that lim x → ∞ ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 − ( x + 2 ) = 0 ⇒ lim x → ∞ ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 − x = lim x → ∞ ( x + 2 ) 2 − 3 − ( x + 2 ) + lim x → ∞ ( x + 2 ) − x = = lim x → ∞ ( x + 2 ) − x due to if there exits lim x → a f ( x ) and it's finite and there exits lim x → a g ( x ) and it's finite then there exists lim x → a f ( x ) + g ( x ) = lim x → a f ( x ) + lim x → a g ( x ) . And the end. Thank you anyway, I know now that this method is right...
Another Method 1: x → ∞ lim ( a x 2 + b x + c ) − ( a x 2 + p x + q ) = 2 a b − p x → ∞ lim ( x 2 + 4 x + 1 ) − x = x → ∞ lim ( x 2 + 4 x + 1 ) − x 2 x → ∞ lim ( x 2 + 4 x + 1 ) − x 2 Subsitued a = 1 , b = 4 , p = 0 : x → ∞ lim ( x 2 + 4 x + 1 ) − x 2 = 2 a b − p = 2 1 4 − 0 = 2 Method 2: x → ∞ lim ( a x + b ) − ( a 2 x 2 + p x + q ) = 2 a 2 a b − p x → ∞ lim ( x 2 + 4 x + 1 ) − x = − x → ∞ lim x − ( x 2 + 4 x + 1 ) Subsitued a = 1 , b = 0 , p = 4 : − x → ∞ lim x − ( x 2 + 4 x + 1 ) = − 2 a ( 2 a b − p ) = − 2 ( 2 . 1 . 0 − 4 ) = − 2 ( − 4 ) = 2
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Because the expression inside the limit has used a radical sign, we may consider solving this limit by conjugates.
The conjugate of the expression, x 2 + 4 x + 1 − x which is simply x 2 + 4 x + 1 + x .
Let us multiply this expression, x 2 + 4 x + 1 − x by x 2 + 4 x + 1 + x x 2 + 4 x + 1 + x ,
x → ∞ lim ( x 2 + 4 x + 1 − x ) = = = = = x → ∞ lim ( x 2 + 4 x + 1 − x ) × x 2 + 4 x + 1 + x x 2 + 4 x + 1 + x x → ∞ lim x 2 + 4 x + 1 + x 4 x + 1 x → ∞ lim x 2 x 2 + x 2 4 x + x 2 1 + x x x 4 x + x 1 1 + 0 + 0 + 1 4 + 0 2