n → ∞ lim k = 0 ∑ n n k ( k + 3 ) ( k n )
Find the value of the closed form of the above limit.
Give your answer to 3 decimal places.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Perfectly-said solution, Indraneel!
@Indraneel Mukhopadhyaya - good solution and indeed the correct concept. But only thing I would recommend you is to use LaTeX when writing solutions involving mathematical symbols.
n → ∞ lim k = 0 ∑ n n k ( k + 3 ) ( k n ) = n → ∞ lim ∫ 0 1 x 2 ( 1 + n x ) n d x = ∫ 0 1 x 2 n → ∞ lim ( 1 + n x ) n d x = ∫ 0 1 x 2 e x d x Integrating by parts = x 2 ∫ 0 1 e x − ∫ 0 1 ( 2 x ) ( ∫ 0 1 e x d x ) d x = x 2 ∫ 0 1 e x − ( 2 x ) ∫ 0 1 e x d x + ∫ 0 1 ( 2 ) ( ∫ 0 1 e x d x ) d x = e − 2 Here we evaluate the limit, n → ∞ lim ( 1 + n x ) n = e lim n → ∞ n x × n = e x ( 1 ∞ f o r m )
This is the simplest approach. It would be better to explain why the first line is true though (via Riemann Sum), otherwise it's hard to understand what you're trying to say.
And of course, stating how you simplified the final limit and evaluating the integral via by parts would be helpful too.
Log in to reply
Thanks for your review to the solution. i will do the required editing soon I get free
Log in to reply
Let me know if you need help improving the answer...
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Sure why not your help is badly needed
Log in to reply
@Anubhav Tyagi – Well, here's the easy part first How do we show that: ∫ 0 1 x 2 e x d x = e − 2 ? Start with integration by parts. Which one should we make u and which one as d v ?
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – Actually what I learnt from calvin lin is that the solution must describe the method rest calculation and integration must be left to the solver so that he applies some brain and does some work not just see the solution
Log in to reply
@Anubhav Tyagi – Yeah, but currently your solution does not describe any method at all. It's just "this one equal to this one and then it's also equal to this one"
Log in to reply
@Pi Han Goh – There were problems in the spreadsheet that I reviewed but now as you see there are no problems as such. Where are they gone?
Log in to reply
@Anubhav Tyagi – I don't know. You should ask one of the staffs...
Why have you again written the same solution?Also,how do you relate the equality by Riemann sums.I could visualize by binomial theorem.I don't think Riemann sums is useful here.
Log in to reply
Ask @Pi Han Goh who asked me to do so. If you are too much eager to make a comment on someone then just make habit of reading all the comments previously made so that you may come to know that it was not me but mention[54224:Pi Han Goh] who asked me to do so
Log in to reply
Someone can comment on your solution only if you first write a solution.That is what I had asked, why had you written the same solution.I simply asked, but I apologize sincerely, as I think you felt offended.I was concerned in understanding the solution,which I have now understood.
Log in to reply
@Virat Kohli – I hope my solution is up to your expectations now.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The key to solve this problem is to realize that the expression (inside limit) is same as integral of this function: integral of (x^2)(1+(x/n))^n dx under the limits 0 to 1.The above equality can be observed easily by use of binomial theorem.The expression (1+(x/n))^n can be rewritten as [(1+(x/n))^(n/x)]^x which, when n tends to infinity becomes e^x.So, the required limit is integral of (x^2)(e^x) dx under the limits 0 to 1.By using integration by parts 2 times, the value of the integral gets evaluated as (e-2).Hence, the value of limit is (e-2).