lo g A ( x 2 + 1 5 ) > lo g A ( 8 x ) The values of x satisfying the above inequality are?
Details & Assumptions :
A = 3 1 × Area of triangle whose vertices are roots of z 3 + i z 2 + 2 i = 0
i = − 1
z ∈ C
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice solution!
can you explain how to find the value of A
Log in to reply
Note that
z 3 + i z 2 + 2 i = ( z − i ) ( z − ( 1 − i ) ) ( z − ( − 1 − i ) ) .
Thus the vertices of the triangle in the complex plane are P ( 0 , 1 ) , Q ( 1 , − 1 ) and R ( − 1 , − 1 ) . This is an isosceles triangle with base Q R length 2 and height 2 , and thus has area 2 .
This gives us A = 3 2 < 1 , which results in the reversed inequality that Vaibhav refers to in his solution, since lo g ( A ) = lo g ( 3 2 ) < 0 .
Log in to reply
thank you so much sir....
Sir, Is there a method to factorize a complex numbers just like factorizing a cubic polynomial??
Log in to reply
@Anandhu Raj – When the coefficients of a polynomial are complex, as is the case here, the first thing to remember is that any complex roots will not necessarily come as conjugate pairs, (that only happens when the coefficients are strictly real). Other than that, the techniques of factoring are fairly similar. In this case, I first noticed that z = i was a root, and when I factored that out of the cubic polynomial I was left with the complex quadratic z 2 + 2 i z − 2 . I then just used the quadratic formula to find the remaining roots.
Log in to reply
@Brian Charlesworth – how did u get z^2 +2iz-2? can u please explain
@Brian Charlesworth – Thank you sir..
Allow me to expand upon Vaibhav's solution. If we take into account the triangle assumption provided to us, then for any z = a + b i ( a , b ∈ R ) :
z 3 + i z 2 + 2 i = 0 ⇒ ( a + b i ) 3 + i ( a + b i ) 2 + 2 i = 0 ;
or ( a 3 + 3 a 2 b i − 3 a b 2 − b 3 i ) + ( a 2 − b 2 + 2 a b i ) i + 2 i = 0 ;
or a 3 − 3 a b 2 − 2 a b = 0 AND 3 a 2 b − b 3 + a 2 − b 2 + 2 = 0 ;
or ( a , b ) = ( ± 1 , − 1 ) ; ( 0 , 1 ) .
Thus, A = 3 1 ⋅ ∣ 2 1 ⋅ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ 1 1 1 0 1 − 1 1 − 1 − 1 ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ ∣ = 3 2 , which gives us the inequality lo g 2 / 3 ( x 2 + 1 5 ) > lo g 2 / 3 ( 8 x ) ⇒ lo g ( 2 / 3 ) lo g ( x 2 + 1 5 ) > lo g ( 2 / 3 ) lo g ( 8 x ) . Since lo g ( 2 / 3 ) < 0 , we require a change of direction in the inequality, or lo g ( x 2 + 1 5 ) < lo g ( 8 x ) . This now gives us:
x 2 + 1 5 < 8 x ⇒ x 2 − 8 x + 1 5 < 0 ⇒ ( x − 3 ) ( x − 5 ) < 0 ⇒ x ∈ ( 3 , 5 ) .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
l o g A ( x 2 + 1 5 ) > l o g A ( 8 x ) ⇒ l o g A l o g ( x 2 + 1 5 ) > l o g A l o g ( 8 x )
⇒ l o g ( x 2 + 1 5 ) < l o g ( 8 x ) Inequality reversed... think why ?
⇒ x 2 + 1 5 < 8 x ⇒ x 2 − 8 x + 1 5 < 0 ⇒ ( x − 3 ) ( x − 5 ) < 0
Now, any x less than 3 would make both ( x − 3 ) and ( x − 5 ) negative. Thus their product would be positive and hence not less than 0 . Also, any x greater than 5 would make their product to be positive and hence not less than 0 . we also can't have x as 3 or 5 since that would make the product 0 where as the conditions says strictly less than.
Only an x between 3 and 5 would make their product negative.
Hence, x belongs to ( 3 , 5 )
Upvote it if you liked it !