I = ∫ 0 2 π e ln ( cos x d x d cos x ) d x
If complex logarithms and complex exponentials are not allowed, what is I equal to?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
How would you explain this??
When I wolframed it to crosscheck I got 2 − 1
Log in to reply
I think for normal logarithmic function, that would be undefined. Wolfram alpha probably used complex analysis for the logarithm. More to read : Link
Log in to reply
nopes it aint complex analysis.. even by solving it normally we get the answer 2 − 1
How did you get the horizontal line in your comment?????
I also you cheater
Thanks. Those who answered -1/2 have been marked correct. The problem has been edited and the correct answer is now "none of these".
In future, if you spot any errors with a problem, you can “report” it by selecting "report problem" in the “dot dot dot” menu in the lower right corner. This will notify the problem creator who can fix the issues.
Ahhh! you got me! I forgot to check out the limits.+1
But if x>0 then exp {ln(-x)}=exp {ln x + i(2n+1)(pi)} [where n is an integer.] =x exp[ i(2n+1)(pi)]= -x.
However, if I consider complex numbers coming into action, this problems can be solved. What say?
Log in to reply
Thanks. Those who answered -1/2 have been marked correct. The problem has been edited and the correct answer is now "none of these".
In future, if you spot any errors with a problem, you can “report” it by selecting "report problem" in the “dot dot dot” menu in the lower right corner. This will notify the problem creator who can fix the issues.
Without using complex exponentials we can obtain − 2 1 as the answer if we simply rewrite − sin x as sin ( − x ) . Any thoughts?
Log in to reply
How ? post your solution please.
Log in to reply
I can't write a solution as I got the question wrong but I could demonstrate it here: ∫ 0 2 π e ln ( cos x d x d ( cos x ) ) d x = ∫ 0 2 π e ln ( cos x sin − x ) d x = ∫ 0 2 π cos ( − x ) sin ( − x ) d x (Since cos ( x ) = cos ( − x ) )
= − sin 2 ( − x ) ∣ 0 π / 2 = − 2 1 .
Log in to reply
@Akeel Howell – Be careful when simplifying. Recall that e ln x = x only when x > 0 (for real logarithms). That is the point of Utsav's solution comment of "the logarithm will not be defined in this interval"
If we used complex logarithms, then your argument might be valid (but would still require checking that we're on the correct logarithmic branch, which isn't immediately obvious to me).
Because of "if" we ought to change from -1/ 2 into "None of these" as mathematical error occurs. However, this is not a general practice as the answer suppose to be -1/ 2 when we posses a more complete knowledge about these.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
e ln ( cos x × d x d ( cos x ) ) = e ln ( cos x × ( − sin x ) ) = e ln ( − 2 1 sin ( 2 x ) )
Since sin ( 2 x ) > 0 in the interval x ∈ ( 0 , 2 π ) , the logarithm will not be defined in this interval, and the integral I will not exist.
Note that e ln ( x ) = x only in the domain of ln ( x ) , that is, only for x > 0 .